Cargando…
More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science
Stress can influence health throughout the lifespan, yet there is little agreement about what types and aspects of stress matter most for human health and disease. This is in part because “stress” is not a monolithic concept but rather, an emergent process that involves interactions between individu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6345505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29551356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2018.03.001 |
_version_ | 1783389585558994944 |
---|---|
author | Epel, Elissa S. Crosswell, Alexandra D. Mayer, Stefanie E. Prather, Aric A. Slavich, George M. Puterman, Eli Mendes, Wendy Berry |
author_facet | Epel, Elissa S. Crosswell, Alexandra D. Mayer, Stefanie E. Prather, Aric A. Slavich, George M. Puterman, Eli Mendes, Wendy Berry |
author_sort | Epel, Elissa S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Stress can influence health throughout the lifespan, yet there is little agreement about what types and aspects of stress matter most for human health and disease. This is in part because “stress” is not a monolithic concept but rather, an emergent process that involves interactions between individual and environmental factors, historical and current events, allostatic states, and psychological and physiological reactivity. Many of these processes alone have been labeled as “stress.” Stress science would be further advanced if researchers adopted a common conceptual model that incorporates epidemiological, affective, and psychophysiological perspectives, with more precise language for describing stress measures. We articulate an integrative working model, highlighting how stressor exposures across the life course influence habitual responding and stress reactivity, and how health behaviors interact with stress. We offer a Stress Typology articulating timescales for stress measurement – acute, event-based, daily, and chronic – and more precise language for dimensions of stress measurement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6345505 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63455052019-01-24 More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science Epel, Elissa S. Crosswell, Alexandra D. Mayer, Stefanie E. Prather, Aric A. Slavich, George M. Puterman, Eli Mendes, Wendy Berry Front Neuroendocrinol Article Stress can influence health throughout the lifespan, yet there is little agreement about what types and aspects of stress matter most for human health and disease. This is in part because “stress” is not a monolithic concept but rather, an emergent process that involves interactions between individual and environmental factors, historical and current events, allostatic states, and psychological and physiological reactivity. Many of these processes alone have been labeled as “stress.” Stress science would be further advanced if researchers adopted a common conceptual model that incorporates epidemiological, affective, and psychophysiological perspectives, with more precise language for describing stress measures. We articulate an integrative working model, highlighting how stressor exposures across the life course influence habitual responding and stress reactivity, and how health behaviors interact with stress. We offer a Stress Typology articulating timescales for stress measurement – acute, event-based, daily, and chronic – and more precise language for dimensions of stress measurement. 2018-03-15 2018-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6345505/ /pubmed/29551356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2018.03.001 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-NC-ND/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Article Epel, Elissa S. Crosswell, Alexandra D. Mayer, Stefanie E. Prather, Aric A. Slavich, George M. Puterman, Eli Mendes, Wendy Berry More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science |
title | More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science |
title_full | More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science |
title_fullStr | More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science |
title_full_unstemmed | More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science |
title_short | More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science |
title_sort | more than a feeling: a unified view of stress measurement for population science |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6345505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29551356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2018.03.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT epelelissas morethanafeelingaunifiedviewofstressmeasurementforpopulationscience AT crosswellalexandrad morethanafeelingaunifiedviewofstressmeasurementforpopulationscience AT mayerstefaniee morethanafeelingaunifiedviewofstressmeasurementforpopulationscience AT pratherarica morethanafeelingaunifiedviewofstressmeasurementforpopulationscience AT slavichgeorgem morethanafeelingaunifiedviewofstressmeasurementforpopulationscience AT putermaneli morethanafeelingaunifiedviewofstressmeasurementforpopulationscience AT mendeswendyberry morethanafeelingaunifiedviewofstressmeasurementforpopulationscience |