Cargando…

More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science

Stress can influence health throughout the lifespan, yet there is little agreement about what types and aspects of stress matter most for human health and disease. This is in part because “stress” is not a monolithic concept but rather, an emergent process that involves interactions between individu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Epel, Elissa S., Crosswell, Alexandra D., Mayer, Stefanie E., Prather, Aric A., Slavich, George M., Puterman, Eli, Mendes, Wendy Berry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6345505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29551356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2018.03.001
_version_ 1783389585558994944
author Epel, Elissa S.
Crosswell, Alexandra D.
Mayer, Stefanie E.
Prather, Aric A.
Slavich, George M.
Puterman, Eli
Mendes, Wendy Berry
author_facet Epel, Elissa S.
Crosswell, Alexandra D.
Mayer, Stefanie E.
Prather, Aric A.
Slavich, George M.
Puterman, Eli
Mendes, Wendy Berry
author_sort Epel, Elissa S.
collection PubMed
description Stress can influence health throughout the lifespan, yet there is little agreement about what types and aspects of stress matter most for human health and disease. This is in part because “stress” is not a monolithic concept but rather, an emergent process that involves interactions between individual and environmental factors, historical and current events, allostatic states, and psychological and physiological reactivity. Many of these processes alone have been labeled as “stress.” Stress science would be further advanced if researchers adopted a common conceptual model that incorporates epidemiological, affective, and psychophysiological perspectives, with more precise language for describing stress measures. We articulate an integrative working model, highlighting how stressor exposures across the life course influence habitual responding and stress reactivity, and how health behaviors interact with stress. We offer a Stress Typology articulating timescales for stress measurement – acute, event-based, daily, and chronic – and more precise language for dimensions of stress measurement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6345505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63455052019-01-24 More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science Epel, Elissa S. Crosswell, Alexandra D. Mayer, Stefanie E. Prather, Aric A. Slavich, George M. Puterman, Eli Mendes, Wendy Berry Front Neuroendocrinol Article Stress can influence health throughout the lifespan, yet there is little agreement about what types and aspects of stress matter most for human health and disease. This is in part because “stress” is not a monolithic concept but rather, an emergent process that involves interactions between individual and environmental factors, historical and current events, allostatic states, and psychological and physiological reactivity. Many of these processes alone have been labeled as “stress.” Stress science would be further advanced if researchers adopted a common conceptual model that incorporates epidemiological, affective, and psychophysiological perspectives, with more precise language for describing stress measures. We articulate an integrative working model, highlighting how stressor exposures across the life course influence habitual responding and stress reactivity, and how health behaviors interact with stress. We offer a Stress Typology articulating timescales for stress measurement – acute, event-based, daily, and chronic – and more precise language for dimensions of stress measurement. 2018-03-15 2018-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6345505/ /pubmed/29551356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2018.03.001 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-NC-ND/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Epel, Elissa S.
Crosswell, Alexandra D.
Mayer, Stefanie E.
Prather, Aric A.
Slavich, George M.
Puterman, Eli
Mendes, Wendy Berry
More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science
title More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science
title_full More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science
title_fullStr More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science
title_full_unstemmed More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science
title_short More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science
title_sort more than a feeling: a unified view of stress measurement for population science
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6345505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29551356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2018.03.001
work_keys_str_mv AT epelelissas morethanafeelingaunifiedviewofstressmeasurementforpopulationscience
AT crosswellalexandrad morethanafeelingaunifiedviewofstressmeasurementforpopulationscience
AT mayerstefaniee morethanafeelingaunifiedviewofstressmeasurementforpopulationscience
AT pratherarica morethanafeelingaunifiedviewofstressmeasurementforpopulationscience
AT slavichgeorgem morethanafeelingaunifiedviewofstressmeasurementforpopulationscience
AT putermaneli morethanafeelingaunifiedviewofstressmeasurementforpopulationscience
AT mendeswendyberry morethanafeelingaunifiedviewofstressmeasurementforpopulationscience