Cargando…
The prognostic significance of PFS24 in follicular lymphoma following firstline immunotherapy: A combined analysis of 3 CALGB trials
Follicular lymphoma (FL) patients treated with firstline R‐CHOP who experience progression of disease (POD) within 2 years have a shorter survival than those who do not have POD within 2 years. Whether this observation holds for patients treated initially with biologic immunotherapy alone is unknown...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6346218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30575311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1918 |
_version_ | 1783389719941349376 |
---|---|
author | Lansigan, Frederick Barak, Ian Pitcher, Brandelyn Jung, Sin‐Ho Cheson, Bruce D. Czuczman, Myron Martin, Peter Hsi, Eric Schöder, Heiko Smith, Scott Bartlett, Nancy L. Leonard, John P. Blum, Kristie A. |
author_facet | Lansigan, Frederick Barak, Ian Pitcher, Brandelyn Jung, Sin‐Ho Cheson, Bruce D. Czuczman, Myron Martin, Peter Hsi, Eric Schöder, Heiko Smith, Scott Bartlett, Nancy L. Leonard, John P. Blum, Kristie A. |
author_sort | Lansigan, Frederick |
collection | PubMed |
description | Follicular lymphoma (FL) patients treated with firstline R‐CHOP who experience progression of disease (POD) within 2 years have a shorter survival than those who do not have POD within 2 years. Whether this observation holds for patients treated initially with biologic immunotherapy alone is unknown. We performed a retrospective analysis of 174 patients pooled from three frontline rituximab (R)‐based nonchemotherapy doublet trials: R‐galiximab (Anti‐CD80, CALGB 50402), R‐epratuzumab (Anti‐CD22, CALGB 50701), and R‐lenalidomide (CALGB 50803) to determine outcomes of early progressors and risk factors for early POD, defined as progression within 24 months from study entry. Twenty‐eight percent (48/174) of patients had early POD. After adjusting for the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI), patients with early POD from study entry had a worse OS compared with patients who did not progress within 2 years (HR = 4.33 (95% CI 1.50‐12.5), P = 0.007). For early POD, the 2‐year survival was 80% vs 99% for nonearly POD, and the 5‐year survival was 74% vs 90%, respectively. These findings suggest that the adverse survival of patients with early POD may be independent of initial treatment modality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6346218 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63462182019-01-29 The prognostic significance of PFS24 in follicular lymphoma following firstline immunotherapy: A combined analysis of 3 CALGB trials Lansigan, Frederick Barak, Ian Pitcher, Brandelyn Jung, Sin‐Ho Cheson, Bruce D. Czuczman, Myron Martin, Peter Hsi, Eric Schöder, Heiko Smith, Scott Bartlett, Nancy L. Leonard, John P. Blum, Kristie A. Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research Follicular lymphoma (FL) patients treated with firstline R‐CHOP who experience progression of disease (POD) within 2 years have a shorter survival than those who do not have POD within 2 years. Whether this observation holds for patients treated initially with biologic immunotherapy alone is unknown. We performed a retrospective analysis of 174 patients pooled from three frontline rituximab (R)‐based nonchemotherapy doublet trials: R‐galiximab (Anti‐CD80, CALGB 50402), R‐epratuzumab (Anti‐CD22, CALGB 50701), and R‐lenalidomide (CALGB 50803) to determine outcomes of early progressors and risk factors for early POD, defined as progression within 24 months from study entry. Twenty‐eight percent (48/174) of patients had early POD. After adjusting for the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI), patients with early POD from study entry had a worse OS compared with patients who did not progress within 2 years (HR = 4.33 (95% CI 1.50‐12.5), P = 0.007). For early POD, the 2‐year survival was 80% vs 99% for nonearly POD, and the 5‐year survival was 74% vs 90%, respectively. These findings suggest that the adverse survival of patients with early POD may be independent of initial treatment modality. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6346218/ /pubmed/30575311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1918 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Cancer Research Lansigan, Frederick Barak, Ian Pitcher, Brandelyn Jung, Sin‐Ho Cheson, Bruce D. Czuczman, Myron Martin, Peter Hsi, Eric Schöder, Heiko Smith, Scott Bartlett, Nancy L. Leonard, John P. Blum, Kristie A. The prognostic significance of PFS24 in follicular lymphoma following firstline immunotherapy: A combined analysis of 3 CALGB trials |
title | The prognostic significance of PFS24 in follicular lymphoma following firstline immunotherapy: A combined analysis of 3 CALGB trials |
title_full | The prognostic significance of PFS24 in follicular lymphoma following firstline immunotherapy: A combined analysis of 3 CALGB trials |
title_fullStr | The prognostic significance of PFS24 in follicular lymphoma following firstline immunotherapy: A combined analysis of 3 CALGB trials |
title_full_unstemmed | The prognostic significance of PFS24 in follicular lymphoma following firstline immunotherapy: A combined analysis of 3 CALGB trials |
title_short | The prognostic significance of PFS24 in follicular lymphoma following firstline immunotherapy: A combined analysis of 3 CALGB trials |
title_sort | prognostic significance of pfs24 in follicular lymphoma following firstline immunotherapy: a combined analysis of 3 calgb trials |
topic | Clinical Cancer Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6346218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30575311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1918 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lansiganfrederick theprognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials AT barakian theprognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials AT pitcherbrandelyn theprognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials AT jungsinho theprognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials AT chesonbruced theprognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials AT czuczmanmyron theprognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials AT martinpeter theprognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials AT hsieric theprognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials AT schoderheiko theprognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials AT smithscott theprognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials AT bartlettnancyl theprognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials AT leonardjohnp theprognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials AT blumkristiea theprognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials AT lansiganfrederick prognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials AT barakian prognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials AT pitcherbrandelyn prognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials AT jungsinho prognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials AT chesonbruced prognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials AT czuczmanmyron prognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials AT martinpeter prognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials AT hsieric prognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials AT schoderheiko prognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials AT smithscott prognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials AT bartlettnancyl prognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials AT leonardjohnp prognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials AT blumkristiea prognosticsignificanceofpfs24infollicularlymphomafollowingfirstlineimmunotherapyacombinedanalysisof3calgbtrials |