Cargando…

Next generation sequencing of PD-L1 for predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND: PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been traditionally used for predicting clinical responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, there are at least 4 different assays and antibodies used for PD-L1 IHC, each developed with a different ICI. We set to test if next generation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conroy, Jeffrey M., Pabla, Sarabjot, Nesline, Mary K., Glenn, Sean T., Papanicolau-Sengos, Antonios, Burgher, Blake, Andreas, Jonathan, Giamo, Vincent, Wang, Yirong, Lenzo, Felicia L., Bshara, Wiam, Khalil, Maya, Dy, Grace K., Madden, Katherine G., Shirai, Keisuke, Dragnev, Konstantin, Tafe, Laura J., Zhu, Jason, Labriola, Matthew, Marin, Daniele, McCall, Shannon J., Clarke, Jeffrey, George, Daniel J., Zhang, Tian, Zibelman, Matthew, Ghatalia, Pooja, Araujo-Fernandez, Isabel, de la Cruz-Merino, Luis, Singavi, Arun, George, Ben, MacKinnon, Alexander C., Thompson, Jonathan, Singh, Rajbir, Jacob, Robin, Kasuganti, Deepa, Shah, Neel, Day, Roger, Galluzzi, Lorenzo, Gardner, Mark, Morrison, Carl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6346512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30678715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-018-0489-5
_version_ 1783389766626050048
author Conroy, Jeffrey M.
Pabla, Sarabjot
Nesline, Mary K.
Glenn, Sean T.
Papanicolau-Sengos, Antonios
Burgher, Blake
Andreas, Jonathan
Giamo, Vincent
Wang, Yirong
Lenzo, Felicia L.
Bshara, Wiam
Khalil, Maya
Dy, Grace K.
Madden, Katherine G.
Shirai, Keisuke
Dragnev, Konstantin
Tafe, Laura J.
Zhu, Jason
Labriola, Matthew
Marin, Daniele
McCall, Shannon J.
Clarke, Jeffrey
George, Daniel J.
Zhang, Tian
Zibelman, Matthew
Ghatalia, Pooja
Araujo-Fernandez, Isabel
de la Cruz-Merino, Luis
Singavi, Arun
George, Ben
MacKinnon, Alexander C.
Thompson, Jonathan
Singh, Rajbir
Jacob, Robin
Kasuganti, Deepa
Shah, Neel
Day, Roger
Galluzzi, Lorenzo
Gardner, Mark
Morrison, Carl
author_facet Conroy, Jeffrey M.
Pabla, Sarabjot
Nesline, Mary K.
Glenn, Sean T.
Papanicolau-Sengos, Antonios
Burgher, Blake
Andreas, Jonathan
Giamo, Vincent
Wang, Yirong
Lenzo, Felicia L.
Bshara, Wiam
Khalil, Maya
Dy, Grace K.
Madden, Katherine G.
Shirai, Keisuke
Dragnev, Konstantin
Tafe, Laura J.
Zhu, Jason
Labriola, Matthew
Marin, Daniele
McCall, Shannon J.
Clarke, Jeffrey
George, Daniel J.
Zhang, Tian
Zibelman, Matthew
Ghatalia, Pooja
Araujo-Fernandez, Isabel
de la Cruz-Merino, Luis
Singavi, Arun
George, Ben
MacKinnon, Alexander C.
Thompson, Jonathan
Singh, Rajbir
Jacob, Robin
Kasuganti, Deepa
Shah, Neel
Day, Roger
Galluzzi, Lorenzo
Gardner, Mark
Morrison, Carl
author_sort Conroy, Jeffrey M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been traditionally used for predicting clinical responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, there are at least 4 different assays and antibodies used for PD-L1 IHC, each developed with a different ICI. We set to test if next generation RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is a robust method to determine PD-L1 mRNA expression levels and furthermore, efficacy of predicting response to ICIs as compared to routinely used, standardized IHC procedures. METHODS: A total of 209 cancer patients treated on-label by FDA-approved ICIs, with evaluable responses were assessed for PD-L1 expression by RNA-seq and IHC, based on tumor proportion score (TPS) and immune cell staining (ICS). A subset of serially diluted cases was evaluated for RNA-seq assay performance across a broad range of PD-L1 expression levels. RESULTS: Assessment of PD-L1 mRNA levels by RNA-seq demonstrated robust linearity across high and low expression ranges. PD-L1 mRNA levels assessed by RNA-seq and IHC (TPS and ICS) were highly correlated (p < 2e-16). Sub-analyses showed sustained correlation when IHC results were classified as high or low by clinically accepted cut-offs (p < 0.01), and results did not differ by tumor type or anti-PD-L1 antibody used. Overall, a combined positive PD-L1 result (≥1% IHC TPS and high PD-L1 expression by RNA-Seq) was associated with a 2-to-5-fold higher overall response rate (ORR) compared to a double negative result. Standard assessments of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) showed that a PD-L1 positive assessment for melanoma samples by RNA-seq had the lowest sensitivity (25%) but the highest PPV (72.7%). Among the three tumor types analyzed in this study, the only non-overlapping confidence interval for predicting response was for “RNA-seq low vs high” in melanoma. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of PD-L1 mRNA expression by RNA-seq is comparable to PD-L1 expression by IHC both analytically and clinically in predicting ICI response. RNA-seq has the added advantages of being amenable to standardization and avoidance of interpretation bias. PD-L1 by RNA-seq needs to be validated in future prospective ICI clinical studies across multiple histologies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40425-018-0489-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6346512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63465122019-01-29 Next generation sequencing of PD-L1 for predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitors Conroy, Jeffrey M. Pabla, Sarabjot Nesline, Mary K. Glenn, Sean T. Papanicolau-Sengos, Antonios Burgher, Blake Andreas, Jonathan Giamo, Vincent Wang, Yirong Lenzo, Felicia L. Bshara, Wiam Khalil, Maya Dy, Grace K. Madden, Katherine G. Shirai, Keisuke Dragnev, Konstantin Tafe, Laura J. Zhu, Jason Labriola, Matthew Marin, Daniele McCall, Shannon J. Clarke, Jeffrey George, Daniel J. Zhang, Tian Zibelman, Matthew Ghatalia, Pooja Araujo-Fernandez, Isabel de la Cruz-Merino, Luis Singavi, Arun George, Ben MacKinnon, Alexander C. Thompson, Jonathan Singh, Rajbir Jacob, Robin Kasuganti, Deepa Shah, Neel Day, Roger Galluzzi, Lorenzo Gardner, Mark Morrison, Carl J Immunother Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been traditionally used for predicting clinical responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, there are at least 4 different assays and antibodies used for PD-L1 IHC, each developed with a different ICI. We set to test if next generation RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is a robust method to determine PD-L1 mRNA expression levels and furthermore, efficacy of predicting response to ICIs as compared to routinely used, standardized IHC procedures. METHODS: A total of 209 cancer patients treated on-label by FDA-approved ICIs, with evaluable responses were assessed for PD-L1 expression by RNA-seq and IHC, based on tumor proportion score (TPS) and immune cell staining (ICS). A subset of serially diluted cases was evaluated for RNA-seq assay performance across a broad range of PD-L1 expression levels. RESULTS: Assessment of PD-L1 mRNA levels by RNA-seq demonstrated robust linearity across high and low expression ranges. PD-L1 mRNA levels assessed by RNA-seq and IHC (TPS and ICS) were highly correlated (p < 2e-16). Sub-analyses showed sustained correlation when IHC results were classified as high or low by clinically accepted cut-offs (p < 0.01), and results did not differ by tumor type or anti-PD-L1 antibody used. Overall, a combined positive PD-L1 result (≥1% IHC TPS and high PD-L1 expression by RNA-Seq) was associated with a 2-to-5-fold higher overall response rate (ORR) compared to a double negative result. Standard assessments of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) showed that a PD-L1 positive assessment for melanoma samples by RNA-seq had the lowest sensitivity (25%) but the highest PPV (72.7%). Among the three tumor types analyzed in this study, the only non-overlapping confidence interval for predicting response was for “RNA-seq low vs high” in melanoma. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of PD-L1 mRNA expression by RNA-seq is comparable to PD-L1 expression by IHC both analytically and clinically in predicting ICI response. RNA-seq has the added advantages of being amenable to standardization and avoidance of interpretation bias. PD-L1 by RNA-seq needs to be validated in future prospective ICI clinical studies across multiple histologies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40425-018-0489-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6346512/ /pubmed/30678715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-018-0489-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Conroy, Jeffrey M.
Pabla, Sarabjot
Nesline, Mary K.
Glenn, Sean T.
Papanicolau-Sengos, Antonios
Burgher, Blake
Andreas, Jonathan
Giamo, Vincent
Wang, Yirong
Lenzo, Felicia L.
Bshara, Wiam
Khalil, Maya
Dy, Grace K.
Madden, Katherine G.
Shirai, Keisuke
Dragnev, Konstantin
Tafe, Laura J.
Zhu, Jason
Labriola, Matthew
Marin, Daniele
McCall, Shannon J.
Clarke, Jeffrey
George, Daniel J.
Zhang, Tian
Zibelman, Matthew
Ghatalia, Pooja
Araujo-Fernandez, Isabel
de la Cruz-Merino, Luis
Singavi, Arun
George, Ben
MacKinnon, Alexander C.
Thompson, Jonathan
Singh, Rajbir
Jacob, Robin
Kasuganti, Deepa
Shah, Neel
Day, Roger
Galluzzi, Lorenzo
Gardner, Mark
Morrison, Carl
Next generation sequencing of PD-L1 for predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitors
title Next generation sequencing of PD-L1 for predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitors
title_full Next generation sequencing of PD-L1 for predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitors
title_fullStr Next generation sequencing of PD-L1 for predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitors
title_full_unstemmed Next generation sequencing of PD-L1 for predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitors
title_short Next generation sequencing of PD-L1 for predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitors
title_sort next generation sequencing of pd-l1 for predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitors
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6346512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30678715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-018-0489-5
work_keys_str_mv AT conroyjeffreym nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT pablasarabjot nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT neslinemaryk nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT glennseant nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT papanicolausengosantonios nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT burgherblake nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT andreasjonathan nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT giamovincent nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT wangyirong nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT lenzofelicial nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT bsharawiam nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT khalilmaya nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT dygracek nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT maddenkatherineg nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT shiraikeisuke nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT dragnevkonstantin nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT tafelauraj nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT zhujason nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT labriolamatthew nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT marindaniele nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT mccallshannonj nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT clarkejeffrey nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT georgedanielj nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT zhangtian nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT zibelmanmatthew nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT ghataliapooja nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT araujofernandezisabel nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT delacruzmerinoluis nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT singaviarun nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT georgeben nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT mackinnonalexanderc nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT thompsonjonathan nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT singhrajbir nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT jacobrobin nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT kasugantideepa nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT shahneel nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT dayroger nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT galluzzilorenzo nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT gardnermark nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT morrisoncarl nextgenerationsequencingofpdl1forpredictingresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors