Cargando…

Parametric and non-parametric gradient matching for network inference: a comparison

BACKGROUND: Reverse engineering of gene regulatory networks from time series gene-expression data is a challenging problem, not only because of the vast sets of candidate interactions but also due to the stochastic nature of gene expression. We limit our analysis to nonlinear differential equation b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dony, Leander, He, Fei, Stumpf, Michael P. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6346534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30683048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2590-7
_version_ 1783389771809161216
author Dony, Leander
He, Fei
Stumpf, Michael P. H.
author_facet Dony, Leander
He, Fei
Stumpf, Michael P. H.
author_sort Dony, Leander
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reverse engineering of gene regulatory networks from time series gene-expression data is a challenging problem, not only because of the vast sets of candidate interactions but also due to the stochastic nature of gene expression. We limit our analysis to nonlinear differential equation based inference methods. In order to avoid the computational cost of large-scale simulations, a two-step Gaussian process interpolation based gradient matching approach has been proposed to solve differential equations approximately. RESULTS: We apply a gradient matching inference approach to a large number of candidate models, including parametric differential equations or their corresponding non-parametric representations, we evaluate the network inference performance under various settings for different inference objectives. We use model averaging, based on the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), to combine the different inferences. The performance of different inference approaches is evaluated using area under the precision-recall curves. CONCLUSIONS: We found that parametric methods can provide comparable, and often improved inference compared to non-parametric methods; the latter, however, require no kinetic information and are computationally more efficient. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12859-018-2590-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6346534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63465342019-01-29 Parametric and non-parametric gradient matching for network inference: a comparison Dony, Leander He, Fei Stumpf, Michael P. H. BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: Reverse engineering of gene regulatory networks from time series gene-expression data is a challenging problem, not only because of the vast sets of candidate interactions but also due to the stochastic nature of gene expression. We limit our analysis to nonlinear differential equation based inference methods. In order to avoid the computational cost of large-scale simulations, a two-step Gaussian process interpolation based gradient matching approach has been proposed to solve differential equations approximately. RESULTS: We apply a gradient matching inference approach to a large number of candidate models, including parametric differential equations or their corresponding non-parametric representations, we evaluate the network inference performance under various settings for different inference objectives. We use model averaging, based on the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), to combine the different inferences. The performance of different inference approaches is evaluated using area under the precision-recall curves. CONCLUSIONS: We found that parametric methods can provide comparable, and often improved inference compared to non-parametric methods; the latter, however, require no kinetic information and are computationally more efficient. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12859-018-2590-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6346534/ /pubmed/30683048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2590-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dony, Leander
He, Fei
Stumpf, Michael P. H.
Parametric and non-parametric gradient matching for network inference: a comparison
title Parametric and non-parametric gradient matching for network inference: a comparison
title_full Parametric and non-parametric gradient matching for network inference: a comparison
title_fullStr Parametric and non-parametric gradient matching for network inference: a comparison
title_full_unstemmed Parametric and non-parametric gradient matching for network inference: a comparison
title_short Parametric and non-parametric gradient matching for network inference: a comparison
title_sort parametric and non-parametric gradient matching for network inference: a comparison
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6346534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30683048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2590-7
work_keys_str_mv AT donyleander parametricandnonparametricgradientmatchingfornetworkinferenceacomparison
AT hefei parametricandnonparametricgradientmatchingfornetworkinferenceacomparison
AT stumpfmichaelph parametricandnonparametricgradientmatchingfornetworkinferenceacomparison