Cargando…
Research approvals iceberg: how a ‘low-key’ study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better
BACKGROUND: The red tape and delays around research ethics and governance approvals frequently frustrate researchers yet, as the lesser of two evils, are largely accepted as unavoidable. Here we quantify aspects of the research ethics and governance approvals for one interview- and questionnaire-bas...
Autores principales: | Petrova, Mila, Barclay, Stephen |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6346542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30678668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0339-5 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Response to Correspondence from Kolstoe and colleagues concerning our paper entitled, Research approvals iceberg: How a ‘low-key’ study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better
por: Petrova, Mila, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Environmental Prevention: Why Do We Need It Now and How to Advance It?
por: Burkhart, Gregor, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Research approvals iceberg: helping it melt away
por: Kolstoe, Simon E., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
How do we incorporate patient views into the design of healthcare services for older people: a discussion paper
por: Brocklehurst, Paul R., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behaviour measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered
por: Kelly, Paul, et al.
Publicado: (2016)