Cargando…
Classification, categorization and essential items for digital ulcer evaluation in systemic sclerosis: a DeSScipher/European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) survey
BACKGROUND: A consensus on digital ulcer (DU) definition in systemic sclerosis (SSc) has been recently reached (Suliman et al., J Scleroderma Relat Disord 2:115-20, 2017), while for their evaluation, classification and categorisation, it is still missing. The aims of this study were to identify a se...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6346551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30678703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1822-1 |
_version_ | 1783389775810527232 |
---|---|
author | Blagojevic, J. Bellando-Randone, S. Abignano, G. Avouac, J. Cometi, L. Czirják, L. Denton, C. P. Distler, O. Frerix, M. Guiducci, S. Huscher, D. Jaeger, V. K. Lóránd, V. Maurer, B. Nihtyanova, S. Riemekasten, G. Siegert, E. Tarner, I. H. Vettori, S. Walker, U. A. Allanore, Y. Müller-Ladner, U. Del Galdo, F. Matucci-Cerinic, M. |
author_facet | Blagojevic, J. Bellando-Randone, S. Abignano, G. Avouac, J. Cometi, L. Czirják, L. Denton, C. P. Distler, O. Frerix, M. Guiducci, S. Huscher, D. Jaeger, V. K. Lóránd, V. Maurer, B. Nihtyanova, S. Riemekasten, G. Siegert, E. Tarner, I. H. Vettori, S. Walker, U. A. Allanore, Y. Müller-Ladner, U. Del Galdo, F. Matucci-Cerinic, M. |
author_sort | Blagojevic, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A consensus on digital ulcer (DU) definition in systemic sclerosis (SSc) has been recently reached (Suliman et al., J Scleroderma Relat Disord 2:115-20, 2017), while for their evaluation, classification and categorisation, it is still missing. The aims of this study were to identify a set of essential items for digital ulcer (DU) evaluation, to assess if the existing DU classification was useful and feasible in clinical practice and to investigate if the new categorisation was preferred to the simple distinction of DU in recurrent and not recurrent, in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: DeSScipher is the largest European multicentre study on SSc. It consists of five observational trials (OTs), and one of them, OT1, is focused on DU management. The DeSScipher OT1 items on DU that reached ≥ 60% of completion rate were administered to EUSTAR (European Scleroderma Trials and Research group) centres via online survey. Questions about feasibility and usefulness of the existing DU classification (DU due to digital pitting scars, to loss of tissue, derived from calcinosis and gangrene) and newly proposed categorisation (episodic, recurrent and chronic) were also asked. RESULTS: A total of 84/148 (56.8%) EUSTAR centres completed the questionnaire. DeSScipher items scored by ≥ 70% of the participants as essential and feasible for DU evaluation were the number of DU defined as a loss of tissue (level of agreement 92%), recurrent DU (84%) and number of new DU (74%). For 65% of the centres, the proposed classification of DU was considered useful and feasible in clinical practice. Moreover, 80% of the centres preferred the categorisation of DU in episodic, recurrent and chronic to simple distinction in recurrent/not recurrent DU. CONCLUSIONS: For clinical practice, EUSTAR centres identified only three essential items for DU evaluation and considered the proposed classification and categorisation as useful and feasible. The set of items needs to be validated while further implementation of DU classification and categorisation is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Observational trial on DU (OT1) is one of the five trials of the DeSScipher project (ClinicalTrials.gov; OT1 Identifier: NCT01836263, posted on April 19, 2013). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-019-1822-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6346551 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63465512019-01-29 Classification, categorization and essential items for digital ulcer evaluation in systemic sclerosis: a DeSScipher/European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) survey Blagojevic, J. Bellando-Randone, S. Abignano, G. Avouac, J. Cometi, L. Czirják, L. Denton, C. P. Distler, O. Frerix, M. Guiducci, S. Huscher, D. Jaeger, V. K. Lóránd, V. Maurer, B. Nihtyanova, S. Riemekasten, G. Siegert, E. Tarner, I. H. Vettori, S. Walker, U. A. Allanore, Y. Müller-Ladner, U. Del Galdo, F. Matucci-Cerinic, M. Arthritis Res Ther Research Article BACKGROUND: A consensus on digital ulcer (DU) definition in systemic sclerosis (SSc) has been recently reached (Suliman et al., J Scleroderma Relat Disord 2:115-20, 2017), while for their evaluation, classification and categorisation, it is still missing. The aims of this study were to identify a set of essential items for digital ulcer (DU) evaluation, to assess if the existing DU classification was useful and feasible in clinical practice and to investigate if the new categorisation was preferred to the simple distinction of DU in recurrent and not recurrent, in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: DeSScipher is the largest European multicentre study on SSc. It consists of five observational trials (OTs), and one of them, OT1, is focused on DU management. The DeSScipher OT1 items on DU that reached ≥ 60% of completion rate were administered to EUSTAR (European Scleroderma Trials and Research group) centres via online survey. Questions about feasibility and usefulness of the existing DU classification (DU due to digital pitting scars, to loss of tissue, derived from calcinosis and gangrene) and newly proposed categorisation (episodic, recurrent and chronic) were also asked. RESULTS: A total of 84/148 (56.8%) EUSTAR centres completed the questionnaire. DeSScipher items scored by ≥ 70% of the participants as essential and feasible for DU evaluation were the number of DU defined as a loss of tissue (level of agreement 92%), recurrent DU (84%) and number of new DU (74%). For 65% of the centres, the proposed classification of DU was considered useful and feasible in clinical practice. Moreover, 80% of the centres preferred the categorisation of DU in episodic, recurrent and chronic to simple distinction in recurrent/not recurrent DU. CONCLUSIONS: For clinical practice, EUSTAR centres identified only three essential items for DU evaluation and considered the proposed classification and categorisation as useful and feasible. The set of items needs to be validated while further implementation of DU classification and categorisation is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Observational trial on DU (OT1) is one of the five trials of the DeSScipher project (ClinicalTrials.gov; OT1 Identifier: NCT01836263, posted on April 19, 2013). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-019-1822-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-24 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6346551/ /pubmed/30678703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1822-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Blagojevic, J. Bellando-Randone, S. Abignano, G. Avouac, J. Cometi, L. Czirják, L. Denton, C. P. Distler, O. Frerix, M. Guiducci, S. Huscher, D. Jaeger, V. K. Lóránd, V. Maurer, B. Nihtyanova, S. Riemekasten, G. Siegert, E. Tarner, I. H. Vettori, S. Walker, U. A. Allanore, Y. Müller-Ladner, U. Del Galdo, F. Matucci-Cerinic, M. Classification, categorization and essential items for digital ulcer evaluation in systemic sclerosis: a DeSScipher/European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) survey |
title | Classification, categorization and essential items for digital ulcer evaluation in systemic sclerosis: a DeSScipher/European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) survey |
title_full | Classification, categorization and essential items for digital ulcer evaluation in systemic sclerosis: a DeSScipher/European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) survey |
title_fullStr | Classification, categorization and essential items for digital ulcer evaluation in systemic sclerosis: a DeSScipher/European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Classification, categorization and essential items for digital ulcer evaluation in systemic sclerosis: a DeSScipher/European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) survey |
title_short | Classification, categorization and essential items for digital ulcer evaluation in systemic sclerosis: a DeSScipher/European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) survey |
title_sort | classification, categorization and essential items for digital ulcer evaluation in systemic sclerosis: a desscipher/european scleroderma trials and research group (eustar) survey |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6346551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30678703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1822-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blagojevicj classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey AT bellandorandones classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey AT abignanog classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey AT avouacj classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey AT cometil classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey AT czirjakl classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey AT dentoncp classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey AT distlero classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey AT frerixm classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey AT guiduccis classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey AT huscherd classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey AT jaegervk classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey AT lorandv classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey AT maurerb classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey AT nihtyanovas classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey AT riemekasteng classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey AT siegerte classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey AT tarnerih classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey AT vettoris classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey AT walkerua classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey AT allanorey classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey AT mullerladneru classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey AT delgaldof classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey AT matuccicerinicm classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey AT classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey |