Cargando…

Classification, categorization and essential items for digital ulcer evaluation in systemic sclerosis: a DeSScipher/European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) survey

BACKGROUND: A consensus on digital ulcer (DU) definition in systemic sclerosis (SSc) has been recently reached (Suliman et al., J Scleroderma Relat Disord 2:115-20, 2017), while for their evaluation, classification and categorisation, it is still missing. The aims of this study were to identify a se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blagojevic, J., Bellando-Randone, S., Abignano, G., Avouac, J., Cometi, L., Czirják, L., Denton, C. P., Distler, O., Frerix, M., Guiducci, S., Huscher, D., Jaeger, V. K., Lóránd, V., Maurer, B., Nihtyanova, S., Riemekasten, G., Siegert, E., Tarner, I. H., Vettori, S., Walker, U. A., Allanore, Y., Müller-Ladner, U., Del Galdo, F., Matucci-Cerinic, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6346551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30678703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1822-1
_version_ 1783389775810527232
author Blagojevic, J.
Bellando-Randone, S.
Abignano, G.
Avouac, J.
Cometi, L.
Czirják, L.
Denton, C. P.
Distler, O.
Frerix, M.
Guiducci, S.
Huscher, D.
Jaeger, V. K.
Lóránd, V.
Maurer, B.
Nihtyanova, S.
Riemekasten, G.
Siegert, E.
Tarner, I. H.
Vettori, S.
Walker, U. A.
Allanore, Y.
Müller-Ladner, U.
Del Galdo, F.
Matucci-Cerinic, M.
author_facet Blagojevic, J.
Bellando-Randone, S.
Abignano, G.
Avouac, J.
Cometi, L.
Czirják, L.
Denton, C. P.
Distler, O.
Frerix, M.
Guiducci, S.
Huscher, D.
Jaeger, V. K.
Lóránd, V.
Maurer, B.
Nihtyanova, S.
Riemekasten, G.
Siegert, E.
Tarner, I. H.
Vettori, S.
Walker, U. A.
Allanore, Y.
Müller-Ladner, U.
Del Galdo, F.
Matucci-Cerinic, M.
author_sort Blagojevic, J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A consensus on digital ulcer (DU) definition in systemic sclerosis (SSc) has been recently reached (Suliman et al., J Scleroderma Relat Disord 2:115-20, 2017), while for their evaluation, classification and categorisation, it is still missing. The aims of this study were to identify a set of essential items for digital ulcer (DU) evaluation, to assess if the existing DU classification was useful and feasible in clinical practice and to investigate if the new categorisation was preferred to the simple distinction of DU in recurrent and not recurrent, in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: DeSScipher is the largest European multicentre study on SSc. It consists of five observational trials (OTs), and one of them, OT1, is focused on DU management. The DeSScipher OT1 items on DU that reached ≥ 60% of completion rate were administered to EUSTAR (European Scleroderma Trials and Research group) centres via online survey. Questions about feasibility and usefulness of the existing DU classification (DU due to digital pitting scars, to loss of tissue, derived from calcinosis and gangrene) and newly proposed categorisation (episodic, recurrent and chronic) were also asked. RESULTS: A total of 84/148 (56.8%) EUSTAR centres completed the questionnaire. DeSScipher items scored by ≥ 70% of the participants as essential and feasible for DU evaluation were the number of DU defined as a loss of tissue (level of agreement 92%), recurrent DU (84%) and number of new DU (74%). For 65% of the centres, the proposed classification of DU was considered useful and feasible in clinical practice. Moreover, 80% of the centres preferred the categorisation of DU in episodic, recurrent and chronic to simple distinction in recurrent/not recurrent DU. CONCLUSIONS: For clinical practice, EUSTAR centres identified only three essential items for DU evaluation and considered the proposed classification and categorisation as useful and feasible. The set of items needs to be validated while further implementation of DU classification and categorisation is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Observational trial on DU (OT1) is one of the five trials of the DeSScipher project (ClinicalTrials.gov; OT1 Identifier: NCT01836263, posted on April 19, 2013). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-019-1822-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6346551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63465512019-01-29 Classification, categorization and essential items for digital ulcer evaluation in systemic sclerosis: a DeSScipher/European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) survey Blagojevic, J. Bellando-Randone, S. Abignano, G. Avouac, J. Cometi, L. Czirják, L. Denton, C. P. Distler, O. Frerix, M. Guiducci, S. Huscher, D. Jaeger, V. K. Lóránd, V. Maurer, B. Nihtyanova, S. Riemekasten, G. Siegert, E. Tarner, I. H. Vettori, S. Walker, U. A. Allanore, Y. Müller-Ladner, U. Del Galdo, F. Matucci-Cerinic, M. Arthritis Res Ther Research Article BACKGROUND: A consensus on digital ulcer (DU) definition in systemic sclerosis (SSc) has been recently reached (Suliman et al., J Scleroderma Relat Disord 2:115-20, 2017), while for their evaluation, classification and categorisation, it is still missing. The aims of this study were to identify a set of essential items for digital ulcer (DU) evaluation, to assess if the existing DU classification was useful and feasible in clinical practice and to investigate if the new categorisation was preferred to the simple distinction of DU in recurrent and not recurrent, in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: DeSScipher is the largest European multicentre study on SSc. It consists of five observational trials (OTs), and one of them, OT1, is focused on DU management. The DeSScipher OT1 items on DU that reached ≥ 60% of completion rate were administered to EUSTAR (European Scleroderma Trials and Research group) centres via online survey. Questions about feasibility and usefulness of the existing DU classification (DU due to digital pitting scars, to loss of tissue, derived from calcinosis and gangrene) and newly proposed categorisation (episodic, recurrent and chronic) were also asked. RESULTS: A total of 84/148 (56.8%) EUSTAR centres completed the questionnaire. DeSScipher items scored by ≥ 70% of the participants as essential and feasible for DU evaluation were the number of DU defined as a loss of tissue (level of agreement 92%), recurrent DU (84%) and number of new DU (74%). For 65% of the centres, the proposed classification of DU was considered useful and feasible in clinical practice. Moreover, 80% of the centres preferred the categorisation of DU in episodic, recurrent and chronic to simple distinction in recurrent/not recurrent DU. CONCLUSIONS: For clinical practice, EUSTAR centres identified only three essential items for DU evaluation and considered the proposed classification and categorisation as useful and feasible. The set of items needs to be validated while further implementation of DU classification and categorisation is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Observational trial on DU (OT1) is one of the five trials of the DeSScipher project (ClinicalTrials.gov; OT1 Identifier: NCT01836263, posted on April 19, 2013). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-019-1822-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-24 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6346551/ /pubmed/30678703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1822-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Blagojevic, J.
Bellando-Randone, S.
Abignano, G.
Avouac, J.
Cometi, L.
Czirják, L.
Denton, C. P.
Distler, O.
Frerix, M.
Guiducci, S.
Huscher, D.
Jaeger, V. K.
Lóránd, V.
Maurer, B.
Nihtyanova, S.
Riemekasten, G.
Siegert, E.
Tarner, I. H.
Vettori, S.
Walker, U. A.
Allanore, Y.
Müller-Ladner, U.
Del Galdo, F.
Matucci-Cerinic, M.
Classification, categorization and essential items for digital ulcer evaluation in systemic sclerosis: a DeSScipher/European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) survey
title Classification, categorization and essential items for digital ulcer evaluation in systemic sclerosis: a DeSScipher/European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) survey
title_full Classification, categorization and essential items for digital ulcer evaluation in systemic sclerosis: a DeSScipher/European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) survey
title_fullStr Classification, categorization and essential items for digital ulcer evaluation in systemic sclerosis: a DeSScipher/European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) survey
title_full_unstemmed Classification, categorization and essential items for digital ulcer evaluation in systemic sclerosis: a DeSScipher/European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) survey
title_short Classification, categorization and essential items for digital ulcer evaluation in systemic sclerosis: a DeSScipher/European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) survey
title_sort classification, categorization and essential items for digital ulcer evaluation in systemic sclerosis: a desscipher/european scleroderma trials and research group (eustar) survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6346551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30678703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1822-1
work_keys_str_mv AT blagojevicj classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey
AT bellandorandones classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey
AT abignanog classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey
AT avouacj classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey
AT cometil classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey
AT czirjakl classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey
AT dentoncp classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey
AT distlero classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey
AT frerixm classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey
AT guiduccis classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey
AT huscherd classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey
AT jaegervk classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey
AT lorandv classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey
AT maurerb classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey
AT nihtyanovas classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey
AT riemekasteng classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey
AT siegerte classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey
AT tarnerih classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey
AT vettoris classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey
AT walkerua classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey
AT allanorey classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey
AT mullerladneru classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey
AT delgaldof classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey
AT matuccicerinicm classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey
AT classificationcategorizationandessentialitemsfordigitalulcerevaluationinsystemicsclerosisadessciphereuropeansclerodermatrialsandresearchgroupeustarsurvey