Cargando…
Patient involvement in medical research: what patients and physicians learn from each other
BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in actively involving patients in the process of medical research to help ensure research is relevant and important to both researchers and people affected by the disease under study. This project examined the recently formed Vasculitis Patient-Powered Resear...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6346573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30678705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-018-0969-1 |
_version_ | 1783389781100593152 |
---|---|
author | Young, Kalen Kaminstein, Dana Olivos, Ana Burroughs, Cristina Castillo-Lee, Celeste Kullman, Joyce McAlear, Carol Shaw, Dianne G. Sreih, Antoine Casey, George Merkel, Peter A. |
author_facet | Young, Kalen Kaminstein, Dana Olivos, Ana Burroughs, Cristina Castillo-Lee, Celeste Kullman, Joyce McAlear, Carol Shaw, Dianne G. Sreih, Antoine Casey, George Merkel, Peter A. |
author_sort | Young, Kalen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in actively involving patients in the process of medical research to help ensure research is relevant and important to both researchers and people affected by the disease under study. This project examined the recently formed Vasculitis Patient-Powered Research Network (VPPRN), a rare disease research network, to better understand what investigators and patients learned from working on research teams together. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted by phone with patients, physician/PhD-investigators, and study managers/staff who participated in the network. The question guiding the interviews and observational analysis was: “What have investigators and patients learned about working together while working on VPPRN teams?” Interview transcripts were analyzed in combination with observations from multiple in-person and telephone meetings. RESULTS: Transcripts and notes were reviewed and coded from 22 interviews conducted among 13 patient-partners, 5 study managers/staff, and 4 MD or PhD-investigators, and 6 in-person and 42 telephone/web-conference meetings. Patient-partners and investigators characterized their working relationships with one another, what they learned from their collaborations, and provided recommendations for future teams of patient-partners and investigators. Major themes included the great benefits of communicating about activities, being open to listening to each group member, and the importance of setting reasonable expectations. CONCLUSIONS: Direct engagement in research design and development by patient-partners and co-learning between investigators and patient-partners can result in a positive and productive working relationship for all members of a medical research team. This bi-directional engagement directly benefits and impacts research design, participant recruitment to studies, and study subject retention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6346573 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63465732019-01-29 Patient involvement in medical research: what patients and physicians learn from each other Young, Kalen Kaminstein, Dana Olivos, Ana Burroughs, Cristina Castillo-Lee, Celeste Kullman, Joyce McAlear, Carol Shaw, Dianne G. Sreih, Antoine Casey, George Merkel, Peter A. Orphanet J Rare Dis Research BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in actively involving patients in the process of medical research to help ensure research is relevant and important to both researchers and people affected by the disease under study. This project examined the recently formed Vasculitis Patient-Powered Research Network (VPPRN), a rare disease research network, to better understand what investigators and patients learned from working on research teams together. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted by phone with patients, physician/PhD-investigators, and study managers/staff who participated in the network. The question guiding the interviews and observational analysis was: “What have investigators and patients learned about working together while working on VPPRN teams?” Interview transcripts were analyzed in combination with observations from multiple in-person and telephone meetings. RESULTS: Transcripts and notes were reviewed and coded from 22 interviews conducted among 13 patient-partners, 5 study managers/staff, and 4 MD or PhD-investigators, and 6 in-person and 42 telephone/web-conference meetings. Patient-partners and investigators characterized their working relationships with one another, what they learned from their collaborations, and provided recommendations for future teams of patient-partners and investigators. Major themes included the great benefits of communicating about activities, being open to listening to each group member, and the importance of setting reasonable expectations. CONCLUSIONS: Direct engagement in research design and development by patient-partners and co-learning between investigators and patient-partners can result in a positive and productive working relationship for all members of a medical research team. This bi-directional engagement directly benefits and impacts research design, participant recruitment to studies, and study subject retention. BioMed Central 2019-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6346573/ /pubmed/30678705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-018-0969-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Young, Kalen Kaminstein, Dana Olivos, Ana Burroughs, Cristina Castillo-Lee, Celeste Kullman, Joyce McAlear, Carol Shaw, Dianne G. Sreih, Antoine Casey, George Merkel, Peter A. Patient involvement in medical research: what patients and physicians learn from each other |
title | Patient involvement in medical research: what patients and physicians learn from each other |
title_full | Patient involvement in medical research: what patients and physicians learn from each other |
title_fullStr | Patient involvement in medical research: what patients and physicians learn from each other |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient involvement in medical research: what patients and physicians learn from each other |
title_short | Patient involvement in medical research: what patients and physicians learn from each other |
title_sort | patient involvement in medical research: what patients and physicians learn from each other |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6346573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30678705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-018-0969-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT youngkalen patientinvolvementinmedicalresearchwhatpatientsandphysicianslearnfromeachother AT kaminsteindana patientinvolvementinmedicalresearchwhatpatientsandphysicianslearnfromeachother AT olivosana patientinvolvementinmedicalresearchwhatpatientsandphysicianslearnfromeachother AT burroughscristina patientinvolvementinmedicalresearchwhatpatientsandphysicianslearnfromeachother AT castilloleeceleste patientinvolvementinmedicalresearchwhatpatientsandphysicianslearnfromeachother AT kullmanjoyce patientinvolvementinmedicalresearchwhatpatientsandphysicianslearnfromeachother AT mcalearcarol patientinvolvementinmedicalresearchwhatpatientsandphysicianslearnfromeachother AT shawdianneg patientinvolvementinmedicalresearchwhatpatientsandphysicianslearnfromeachother AT sreihantoine patientinvolvementinmedicalresearchwhatpatientsandphysicianslearnfromeachother AT caseygeorge patientinvolvementinmedicalresearchwhatpatientsandphysicianslearnfromeachother AT patientinvolvementinmedicalresearchwhatpatientsandphysicianslearnfromeachother AT merkelpetera patientinvolvementinmedicalresearchwhatpatientsandphysicianslearnfromeachother |