Cargando…

Plant–pollinator interactions over time: Pollen metabarcoding from bees in a historic collection

Pollination is a key component in agricultural food production and ecosystem maintenance, with plant–pollinator interactions an important research theme in ecological and evolutionary studies. Natural history collections provide unique access to samples collected at different spatial and temporal sc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gous, Annemarie, Swanevelder, Dirk Z. H., Eardley, Connal D., Willows‐Munro, Sandi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6346658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30697333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12707
_version_ 1783389794718449664
author Gous, Annemarie
Swanevelder, Dirk Z. H.
Eardley, Connal D.
Willows‐Munro, Sandi
author_facet Gous, Annemarie
Swanevelder, Dirk Z. H.
Eardley, Connal D.
Willows‐Munro, Sandi
author_sort Gous, Annemarie
collection PubMed
description Pollination is a key component in agricultural food production and ecosystem maintenance, with plant–pollinator interactions an important research theme in ecological and evolutionary studies. Natural history collections provide unique access to samples collected at different spatial and temporal scales. Identification of the plant origins of pollen trapped on the bodies of pollinators in these collections provides insight into historic plant communities and pollinators’ preferred floral taxa. In this study, pollen was sampled from Megachile venusta Smith bees from the National Collection of Insects, South Africa, spanning 93 years. Three barcode regions, the internal transcribed spacer 1 and 2 (ITS1 and ITS2) and ribulose‐1,5‐biphosphate carboxylase (rbcL), were sequenced from mixed pollen samples using a next‐generation sequencing approach (MiSeq, Illumina). Sequenced reads were compared to sequence reference databases that were generated by extracting sequence and taxonomic data from GenBank. ITS1 and ITS2 were amplified successfully across all (or most) samples, while rbcL performed inconsistently. Age of sample had no impact on sequencing success. Plant classification was more informative using ITS2 than ITS1 barcode data. This study also highlights the need for comprehensive reference databases as limited local plant sequence representation in reference databases resulted in higher‐level taxon classifications being more confidently interpreted. The results showed that small, insect‐carried pollen samples from historic bee specimens collected from as early as 1914 can be used to obtain pollen metabarcodes. DNA metabarcoding of mixed origin pollen samples provided a faster, more accurate method of determining pollen provenance, without the need for expert palynologists. The use of historic collections to sample pollen directly from pollinators provided additional value to these collections. Sampling pollen from historic collections can potentially provide the spatial and temporal scales for investigations into changes in plant community structure or pollinator floral choice in the face of global climate change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6346658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63466582019-01-29 Plant–pollinator interactions over time: Pollen metabarcoding from bees in a historic collection Gous, Annemarie Swanevelder, Dirk Z. H. Eardley, Connal D. Willows‐Munro, Sandi Evol Appl Original Articles Pollination is a key component in agricultural food production and ecosystem maintenance, with plant–pollinator interactions an important research theme in ecological and evolutionary studies. Natural history collections provide unique access to samples collected at different spatial and temporal scales. Identification of the plant origins of pollen trapped on the bodies of pollinators in these collections provides insight into historic plant communities and pollinators’ preferred floral taxa. In this study, pollen was sampled from Megachile venusta Smith bees from the National Collection of Insects, South Africa, spanning 93 years. Three barcode regions, the internal transcribed spacer 1 and 2 (ITS1 and ITS2) and ribulose‐1,5‐biphosphate carboxylase (rbcL), were sequenced from mixed pollen samples using a next‐generation sequencing approach (MiSeq, Illumina). Sequenced reads were compared to sequence reference databases that were generated by extracting sequence and taxonomic data from GenBank. ITS1 and ITS2 were amplified successfully across all (or most) samples, while rbcL performed inconsistently. Age of sample had no impact on sequencing success. Plant classification was more informative using ITS2 than ITS1 barcode data. This study also highlights the need for comprehensive reference databases as limited local plant sequence representation in reference databases resulted in higher‐level taxon classifications being more confidently interpreted. The results showed that small, insect‐carried pollen samples from historic bee specimens collected from as early as 1914 can be used to obtain pollen metabarcodes. DNA metabarcoding of mixed origin pollen samples provided a faster, more accurate method of determining pollen provenance, without the need for expert palynologists. The use of historic collections to sample pollen directly from pollinators provided additional value to these collections. Sampling pollen from historic collections can potentially provide the spatial and temporal scales for investigations into changes in plant community structure or pollinator floral choice in the face of global climate change. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6346658/ /pubmed/30697333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12707 Text en © 2018 The Authors Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Gous, Annemarie
Swanevelder, Dirk Z. H.
Eardley, Connal D.
Willows‐Munro, Sandi
Plant–pollinator interactions over time: Pollen metabarcoding from bees in a historic collection
title Plant–pollinator interactions over time: Pollen metabarcoding from bees in a historic collection
title_full Plant–pollinator interactions over time: Pollen metabarcoding from bees in a historic collection
title_fullStr Plant–pollinator interactions over time: Pollen metabarcoding from bees in a historic collection
title_full_unstemmed Plant–pollinator interactions over time: Pollen metabarcoding from bees in a historic collection
title_short Plant–pollinator interactions over time: Pollen metabarcoding from bees in a historic collection
title_sort plant–pollinator interactions over time: pollen metabarcoding from bees in a historic collection
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6346658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30697333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12707
work_keys_str_mv AT gousannemarie plantpollinatorinteractionsovertimepollenmetabarcodingfrombeesinahistoriccollection
AT swanevelderdirkzh plantpollinatorinteractionsovertimepollenmetabarcodingfrombeesinahistoriccollection
AT eardleyconnald plantpollinatorinteractionsovertimepollenmetabarcodingfrombeesinahistoriccollection
AT willowsmunrosandi plantpollinatorinteractionsovertimepollenmetabarcodingfrombeesinahistoriccollection