Cargando…

Comparison of standardized uptake values between (99m)Tc-HDP SPECT/CT and (18)F-NaF PET/CT in bone metastases of breast and prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: Despite recent technological advances allowing for quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), quantitative SPECT has not been widely used in the clinical practice. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of quantitative SPECT for measuring metastatic bo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arvola, Samuli, Jambor, Ivan, Kuisma, Anna, Kemppainen, Jukka, Kajander, Sami, Seppänen, Marko, Noponen, Tommi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6346696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30680469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-019-0475-z
_version_ 1783389802793533440
author Arvola, Samuli
Jambor, Ivan
Kuisma, Anna
Kemppainen, Jukka
Kajander, Sami
Seppänen, Marko
Noponen, Tommi
author_facet Arvola, Samuli
Jambor, Ivan
Kuisma, Anna
Kemppainen, Jukka
Kajander, Sami
Seppänen, Marko
Noponen, Tommi
author_sort Arvola, Samuli
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite recent technological advances allowing for quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), quantitative SPECT has not been widely used in the clinical practice. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of quantitative SPECT for measuring metastatic bone uptake in breast and prostate cancer by comparing standard uptake values (SUVs) measured with (99m)Tc-HDP SPECT/CT and (18)F-NaF PET/CT. METHODS: Twenty-six breast and 27 prostate cancer patients at high risk of bone metastases underwent both (99m)Tc-HDP SPECT/CT and (18)F-NaF PET/CT within 14 days of each other. The SPECT and PET data were reconstructed using ordered-subset expectation-maximization algorithms achieving quantitative images. Metastatic and benign skeletal lesions visible in both data sets were identified, and their maximum, peak, and mean SUVs (SUV(max), SUV(peak), and SUV(mean)) were determined. SUV ratios (SUVRs) between the lesions and adjacent normal appearing bone were also calculated. Linear regression was used to evaluate the correlations between the SUVs of SPECT and PET and Bland-Altman plots to evaluate the differences between the SUVs and SUVRs of SPECT and PET. RESULTS: A total of 231 skeletal lesions, 129 metastatic and 102 benign, were analyzed. All three SUV measures correlated very strongly between SPECT and PET (R(2) ≥ 0.80, p < 0.001) when all lesions were included, and the PET SUVs were significantly higher than SPECT SUVs (p < 0.001). The median differences were 21%, 12%, and 19% for SUV(max), SUV(peak), and SUV(mean), respectively. On the other hand, the SUVRs were similar between SPECT and PET with median differences of 2%, − 9%, and 2% for SUVR(max), SUVR(peak), and SUVR(mean), respectively. CONCLUSION: The strong correlation between SUVs and similar SUVRs of (99m)Tc-HDP SPECT/CT and (18)F-NaF PET/CT demonstrate that SPECT is an applicable tool for clinical quantification of bone metabolism in osseous metastases in breast and prostate cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6346696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63466962019-02-08 Comparison of standardized uptake values between (99m)Tc-HDP SPECT/CT and (18)F-NaF PET/CT in bone metastases of breast and prostate cancer Arvola, Samuli Jambor, Ivan Kuisma, Anna Kemppainen, Jukka Kajander, Sami Seppänen, Marko Noponen, Tommi EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Despite recent technological advances allowing for quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), quantitative SPECT has not been widely used in the clinical practice. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of quantitative SPECT for measuring metastatic bone uptake in breast and prostate cancer by comparing standard uptake values (SUVs) measured with (99m)Tc-HDP SPECT/CT and (18)F-NaF PET/CT. METHODS: Twenty-six breast and 27 prostate cancer patients at high risk of bone metastases underwent both (99m)Tc-HDP SPECT/CT and (18)F-NaF PET/CT within 14 days of each other. The SPECT and PET data were reconstructed using ordered-subset expectation-maximization algorithms achieving quantitative images. Metastatic and benign skeletal lesions visible in both data sets were identified, and their maximum, peak, and mean SUVs (SUV(max), SUV(peak), and SUV(mean)) were determined. SUV ratios (SUVRs) between the lesions and adjacent normal appearing bone were also calculated. Linear regression was used to evaluate the correlations between the SUVs of SPECT and PET and Bland-Altman plots to evaluate the differences between the SUVs and SUVRs of SPECT and PET. RESULTS: A total of 231 skeletal lesions, 129 metastatic and 102 benign, were analyzed. All three SUV measures correlated very strongly between SPECT and PET (R(2) ≥ 0.80, p < 0.001) when all lesions were included, and the PET SUVs were significantly higher than SPECT SUVs (p < 0.001). The median differences were 21%, 12%, and 19% for SUV(max), SUV(peak), and SUV(mean), respectively. On the other hand, the SUVRs were similar between SPECT and PET with median differences of 2%, − 9%, and 2% for SUVR(max), SUVR(peak), and SUVR(mean), respectively. CONCLUSION: The strong correlation between SUVs and similar SUVRs of (99m)Tc-HDP SPECT/CT and (18)F-NaF PET/CT demonstrate that SPECT is an applicable tool for clinical quantification of bone metabolism in osseous metastases in breast and prostate cancer patients. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6346696/ /pubmed/30680469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-019-0475-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Arvola, Samuli
Jambor, Ivan
Kuisma, Anna
Kemppainen, Jukka
Kajander, Sami
Seppänen, Marko
Noponen, Tommi
Comparison of standardized uptake values between (99m)Tc-HDP SPECT/CT and (18)F-NaF PET/CT in bone metastases of breast and prostate cancer
title Comparison of standardized uptake values between (99m)Tc-HDP SPECT/CT and (18)F-NaF PET/CT in bone metastases of breast and prostate cancer
title_full Comparison of standardized uptake values between (99m)Tc-HDP SPECT/CT and (18)F-NaF PET/CT in bone metastases of breast and prostate cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of standardized uptake values between (99m)Tc-HDP SPECT/CT and (18)F-NaF PET/CT in bone metastases of breast and prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of standardized uptake values between (99m)Tc-HDP SPECT/CT and (18)F-NaF PET/CT in bone metastases of breast and prostate cancer
title_short Comparison of standardized uptake values between (99m)Tc-HDP SPECT/CT and (18)F-NaF PET/CT in bone metastases of breast and prostate cancer
title_sort comparison of standardized uptake values between (99m)tc-hdp spect/ct and (18)f-naf pet/ct in bone metastases of breast and prostate cancer
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6346696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30680469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-019-0475-z
work_keys_str_mv AT arvolasamuli comparisonofstandardizeduptakevaluesbetween99mtchdpspectctand18fnafpetctinbonemetastasesofbreastandprostatecancer
AT jamborivan comparisonofstandardizeduptakevaluesbetween99mtchdpspectctand18fnafpetctinbonemetastasesofbreastandprostatecancer
AT kuismaanna comparisonofstandardizeduptakevaluesbetween99mtchdpspectctand18fnafpetctinbonemetastasesofbreastandprostatecancer
AT kemppainenjukka comparisonofstandardizeduptakevaluesbetween99mtchdpspectctand18fnafpetctinbonemetastasesofbreastandprostatecancer
AT kajandersami comparisonofstandardizeduptakevaluesbetween99mtchdpspectctand18fnafpetctinbonemetastasesofbreastandprostatecancer
AT seppanenmarko comparisonofstandardizeduptakevaluesbetween99mtchdpspectctand18fnafpetctinbonemetastasesofbreastandprostatecancer
AT noponentommi comparisonofstandardizeduptakevaluesbetween99mtchdpspectctand18fnafpetctinbonemetastasesofbreastandprostatecancer