Vascular response and intrastent thrombus in the early phase after drug‐eluting versus bare‐metal stent implantation in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction: An observational, single‐center study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Second‐generation drug‐eluting stents (G2‐DES) are associated with a lower rate of acute and subacute stent thrombosis compared with bare‐metal stent (BMS) in the setting of ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In this study, our aim was to compare the vascular response and thrombus burden between G2‐DES and BMS in early‐phase STEMI. METHODS: Between May 2010 and August 2014, a total of 41 STEMI patients treated by either G2‐DES (n = 26; everolimus‐eluting stent [EES]: n = 15, zotarolimus‐eluting stent [ZES]: n = 11) or BMS (n = 15) and, with multivessel disease requiring additional percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), were prospectively enrolled. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging was performed at 1 month after stent implantation. RESULTS: Baseline clinical characteristics, except for age (61.5 ± 9.3 vs 69.3 ± 9.8, P = 0.01, t test), were comparable between patients with drug‐eluting stent (DES) and BMS. The incidence of residual thrombus after the stent implantation for STEMI was comparable between DES and BMS (7.7% vs 6.7%, P = 0.88, χ (2) test). At 1 month, thrombus burden, defined as the mean thrombus area divided by the mean lumen area, was significantly smaller with DES than with BMS (median interquartile range (IQR), 1.2 (0.0, 1.0) vs 1.2 (0.0, 2.2), P = 0.04, Mann‐Whitney U test), despite a similar percentage of malapposed (median (IQR), 6.2 (2.4, 9.0) vs 2.6 (0.0, 5.8)%, P = 0.07, Mann‐Whitney U test) or uncovered struts (median (IQR), 6.8 (1.8, 13.1) vs 6.14 (2.8, 18.5)%, P = 0.45, Mann‐Whitney U test). No significant difference in thrombus burden was observed between EES and ZES. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombus burden was significantly smaller with DES than with BMS at 1‐month follow‐up in STEMI cases, although the percentage of malapposed or uncovered struts was similar between the groups. This may partly explain the lower rate of acute and subacute stent thrombosis in G2‐DES that has previously been reported in the literature.