Cargando…

Continuous Infusion versus Intermittent Dosing with Pantoprazole for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Proton pump inhibitors are widely used to prevent gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-related bleeding, but no standard administration regimens have been established. We aimed to prospectively compare the effects of continuous infusion and intermittent dosing with pantopr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Bong Eun, Kim, Gwang Ha, Song, Geun Am, Seo, Jong Hun, Jeon, Hye Kyung, Baek, Dong Hoon, Kim, Dong Uk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial Office of Gut and Liver 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400726
http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl18222
_version_ 1783389868309610496
author Lee, Bong Eun
Kim, Gwang Ha
Song, Geun Am
Seo, Jong Hun
Jeon, Hye Kyung
Baek, Dong Hoon
Kim, Dong Uk
author_facet Lee, Bong Eun
Kim, Gwang Ha
Song, Geun Am
Seo, Jong Hun
Jeon, Hye Kyung
Baek, Dong Hoon
Kim, Dong Uk
author_sort Lee, Bong Eun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Proton pump inhibitors are widely used to prevent gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-related bleeding, but no standard administration regimens have been established. We aimed to prospectively compare the effects of continuous infusion and intermittent dosing with pantoprazole on preventing gastric ESD-related bleeding. Additionally, we analyzed the risk factors for bleeding. METHODS: From April 2012 to May 2013, patients with a gastric epithelial neoplasm scheduled for ESD in the Pusan National University Hospital were randomly assigned to one of two groups according to the pantoprazole administration regimen (continuous infusion or intermittent dosing). The primary outcomes measured were intra- and postprocedural bleeding events. RESULTS: The final analysis included 401 patients. The rate of significant intraprocedural bleeding was 25.4% in the C group and 24.0% in the I group, with no significant difference (p=0.419). In addition, there was no significant difference in the postprocedural bleeding rate between the C and I groups (11.7% vs 10.2%, p=0.374). Multivariate analysis showed that intraprocedural bleeding was associated with the proximal tumor location, the presence of fibrosis, and the size of the resected specimen, whereas postprocedural bleeding was associated with the size of the resected specimen and the procedure/coagulation time. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent dosing with pantoprazole is sufficient and cost-effective for the prevention of gastric ESD-related bleeding. Operators should consider tumor characteristics when planning ESD to minimize the risk of intraprocedural bleeding, and patients with large iatrogenic ulcers should be carefully monitored for postprocedural bleeding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6347001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Editorial Office of Gut and Liver
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63470012019-02-04 Continuous Infusion versus Intermittent Dosing with Pantoprazole for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Lee, Bong Eun Kim, Gwang Ha Song, Geun Am Seo, Jong Hun Jeon, Hye Kyung Baek, Dong Hoon Kim, Dong Uk Gut Liver Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Proton pump inhibitors are widely used to prevent gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-related bleeding, but no standard administration regimens have been established. We aimed to prospectively compare the effects of continuous infusion and intermittent dosing with pantoprazole on preventing gastric ESD-related bleeding. Additionally, we analyzed the risk factors for bleeding. METHODS: From April 2012 to May 2013, patients with a gastric epithelial neoplasm scheduled for ESD in the Pusan National University Hospital were randomly assigned to one of two groups according to the pantoprazole administration regimen (continuous infusion or intermittent dosing). The primary outcomes measured were intra- and postprocedural bleeding events. RESULTS: The final analysis included 401 patients. The rate of significant intraprocedural bleeding was 25.4% in the C group and 24.0% in the I group, with no significant difference (p=0.419). In addition, there was no significant difference in the postprocedural bleeding rate between the C and I groups (11.7% vs 10.2%, p=0.374). Multivariate analysis showed that intraprocedural bleeding was associated with the proximal tumor location, the presence of fibrosis, and the size of the resected specimen, whereas postprocedural bleeding was associated with the size of the resected specimen and the procedure/coagulation time. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent dosing with pantoprazole is sufficient and cost-effective for the prevention of gastric ESD-related bleeding. Operators should consider tumor characteristics when planning ESD to minimize the risk of intraprocedural bleeding, and patients with large iatrogenic ulcers should be carefully monitored for postprocedural bleeding. Editorial Office of Gut and Liver 2019-01 2018-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6347001/ /pubmed/30400726 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl18222 Text en Copyright © 2019 by The Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Korean Association the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, and Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Bong Eun
Kim, Gwang Ha
Song, Geun Am
Seo, Jong Hun
Jeon, Hye Kyung
Baek, Dong Hoon
Kim, Dong Uk
Continuous Infusion versus Intermittent Dosing with Pantoprazole for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title Continuous Infusion versus Intermittent Dosing with Pantoprazole for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title_full Continuous Infusion versus Intermittent Dosing with Pantoprazole for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title_fullStr Continuous Infusion versus Intermittent Dosing with Pantoprazole for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title_full_unstemmed Continuous Infusion versus Intermittent Dosing with Pantoprazole for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title_short Continuous Infusion versus Intermittent Dosing with Pantoprazole for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title_sort continuous infusion versus intermittent dosing with pantoprazole for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400726
http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl18222
work_keys_str_mv AT leebongeun continuousinfusionversusintermittentdosingwithpantoprazoleforgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT kimgwangha continuousinfusionversusintermittentdosingwithpantoprazoleforgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT songgeunam continuousinfusionversusintermittentdosingwithpantoprazoleforgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT seojonghun continuousinfusionversusintermittentdosingwithpantoprazoleforgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT jeonhyekyung continuousinfusionversusintermittentdosingwithpantoprazoleforgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT baekdonghoon continuousinfusionversusintermittentdosingwithpantoprazoleforgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT kimdonguk continuousinfusionversusintermittentdosingwithpantoprazoleforgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection