Cargando…

Perceptual lateralization of vocal stimuli in goats

Functional asymmetries, for example, the preferential involvement of 1 brain hemisphere to process stimuli, may increase brain efficiency and the capacity to carry out tasks simultaneously. We investigated which hemisphere was primarily involved in processing acoustic stimuli in goats using a head-o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baciadonna, Luigi, Nawroth, Christian, Briefer, Elodie F, McElligott, Alan G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30697240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoy022
_version_ 1783389874044272640
author Baciadonna, Luigi
Nawroth, Christian
Briefer, Elodie F
McElligott, Alan G
author_facet Baciadonna, Luigi
Nawroth, Christian
Briefer, Elodie F
McElligott, Alan G
author_sort Baciadonna, Luigi
collection PubMed
description Functional asymmetries, for example, the preferential involvement of 1 brain hemisphere to process stimuli, may increase brain efficiency and the capacity to carry out tasks simultaneously. We investigated which hemisphere was primarily involved in processing acoustic stimuli in goats using a head-orienting paradigm. Three playbacks using goat vocalizations recorded in different contexts: food anticipation (positive), isolation (negative), food frustration (negative), as well as 1 playback involving dog barks (negative) were presented on the left and right sides of the test subjects simultaneously. The head-orienting response (left or right) and latency to resume feeding were recorded. The direction of the head-orienting response did not differ between the various playbacks. However, when the head-orienting response was tested against chance level, goats showed a right bias regardless of the stimuli presented. Goats responded more to dog barks than to food frustration calls, whereas responses to food anticipation and isolation calls were intermediate. In addition, the latency to resume feeding, an indicator of fear reaction, was not affected by the kind of vocalization presented. These results provide evidence for asymmetries in goat vocal perception of emotional-linked conspecific and heterospecific calls. They also suggest involvement of the left brain hemisphere for processing acoustic stimuli, which might have been perceived as familiar and non-threatening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6347058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63470582019-01-29 Perceptual lateralization of vocal stimuli in goats Baciadonna, Luigi Nawroth, Christian Briefer, Elodie F McElligott, Alan G Curr Zool Articles Functional asymmetries, for example, the preferential involvement of 1 brain hemisphere to process stimuli, may increase brain efficiency and the capacity to carry out tasks simultaneously. We investigated which hemisphere was primarily involved in processing acoustic stimuli in goats using a head-orienting paradigm. Three playbacks using goat vocalizations recorded in different contexts: food anticipation (positive), isolation (negative), food frustration (negative), as well as 1 playback involving dog barks (negative) were presented on the left and right sides of the test subjects simultaneously. The head-orienting response (left or right) and latency to resume feeding were recorded. The direction of the head-orienting response did not differ between the various playbacks. However, when the head-orienting response was tested against chance level, goats showed a right bias regardless of the stimuli presented. Goats responded more to dog barks than to food frustration calls, whereas responses to food anticipation and isolation calls were intermediate. In addition, the latency to resume feeding, an indicator of fear reaction, was not affected by the kind of vocalization presented. These results provide evidence for asymmetries in goat vocal perception of emotional-linked conspecific and heterospecific calls. They also suggest involvement of the left brain hemisphere for processing acoustic stimuli, which might have been perceived as familiar and non-threatening. Oxford University Press 2019-02 2018-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6347058/ /pubmed/30697240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoy022 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Editorial Office, Current Zoology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Articles
Baciadonna, Luigi
Nawroth, Christian
Briefer, Elodie F
McElligott, Alan G
Perceptual lateralization of vocal stimuli in goats
title Perceptual lateralization of vocal stimuli in goats
title_full Perceptual lateralization of vocal stimuli in goats
title_fullStr Perceptual lateralization of vocal stimuli in goats
title_full_unstemmed Perceptual lateralization of vocal stimuli in goats
title_short Perceptual lateralization of vocal stimuli in goats
title_sort perceptual lateralization of vocal stimuli in goats
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30697240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoy022
work_keys_str_mv AT baciadonnaluigi perceptuallateralizationofvocalstimuliingoats
AT nawrothchristian perceptuallateralizationofvocalstimuliingoats
AT brieferelodief perceptuallateralizationofvocalstimuliingoats
AT mcelligottalang perceptuallateralizationofvocalstimuliingoats