Cargando…
Coccidioidomycosis: What a long strange trip it's been
The recorded history of coccidioidomycosis began in 1892 with the report of the illness of Domingo Escurra by Alejandro Posadas followed by a description of the first North American cases by Rixford and Gilchrist. Originally considered a protozoan, William Ophüls determined that Coccidioides was a f...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30690606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myy123 |
_version_ | 1783389876381548544 |
---|---|
author | Deresinski, Stan Mirels, Laurence F |
author_facet | Deresinski, Stan Mirels, Laurence F |
author_sort | Deresinski, Stan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The recorded history of coccidioidomycosis began in 1892 with the report of the illness of Domingo Escurra by Alejandro Posadas followed by a description of the first North American cases by Rixford and Gilchrist. Originally considered a protozoan, William Ophüls determined that Coccidioides was a fungus and that the lungs were the apparent initial site of infection. During the 1930s, both Gifford and Dickson determined that a self-limited illness, Valley Fever, was caused by the same fungus that caused the often fatal coccidioidal granuloma. Charles Smith, over a period of approximately 2 decades, comprehensively described the clinical and geographic epidemiology of coccidioidomycosis in California. Demosthenes Pappagianis continued this work after Smith's death. In 1957, one year before Marshall Fiese published his masterful monograph on coccidioidomycosis, the use of the first effective agent for the therapy of coccidioidomycosis, amphotericin B, was reported. This was followed by descriptions of its appropriate clinical use by William Winn and by Hans Einstein, among others. The development of the much less toxic azole antifungal agents greatly simplified therapy in many cases, but much of the management of patients with coccidioidomycosis still relies more on art than science. The search for the “Holy Grail” - a vaccine capable of preventing this disease-continues. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6347081 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63470812019-01-29 Coccidioidomycosis: What a long strange trip it's been Deresinski, Stan Mirels, Laurence F Med Mycol Review Article The recorded history of coccidioidomycosis began in 1892 with the report of the illness of Domingo Escurra by Alejandro Posadas followed by a description of the first North American cases by Rixford and Gilchrist. Originally considered a protozoan, William Ophüls determined that Coccidioides was a fungus and that the lungs were the apparent initial site of infection. During the 1930s, both Gifford and Dickson determined that a self-limited illness, Valley Fever, was caused by the same fungus that caused the often fatal coccidioidal granuloma. Charles Smith, over a period of approximately 2 decades, comprehensively described the clinical and geographic epidemiology of coccidioidomycosis in California. Demosthenes Pappagianis continued this work after Smith's death. In 1957, one year before Marshall Fiese published his masterful monograph on coccidioidomycosis, the use of the first effective agent for the therapy of coccidioidomycosis, amphotericin B, was reported. This was followed by descriptions of its appropriate clinical use by William Winn and by Hans Einstein, among others. The development of the much less toxic azole antifungal agents greatly simplified therapy in many cases, but much of the management of patients with coccidioidomycosis still relies more on art than science. The search for the “Holy Grail” - a vaccine capable of preventing this disease-continues. Oxford University Press 2019-01-25 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6347081/ /pubmed/30690606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myy123 Text en © The Author 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Review Article Deresinski, Stan Mirels, Laurence F Coccidioidomycosis: What a long strange trip it's been |
title | Coccidioidomycosis: What a long strange trip it's been |
title_full | Coccidioidomycosis: What a long strange trip it's been |
title_fullStr | Coccidioidomycosis: What a long strange trip it's been |
title_full_unstemmed | Coccidioidomycosis: What a long strange trip it's been |
title_short | Coccidioidomycosis: What a long strange trip it's been |
title_sort | coccidioidomycosis: what a long strange trip it's been |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30690606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myy123 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deresinskistan coccidioidomycosiswhatalongstrangetripitsbeen AT mirelslaurencef coccidioidomycosiswhatalongstrangetripitsbeen |