Cargando…

Transanal Tube Drainage as a Conservative Treatment for Anastomotic Leakage Following a Rectal Resection

PURPOSE: We evaluate the role of transanal tube drainage (TD) as a conservative treatment for patients with anastomotic leakage (AL). METHODS: Patients treated for AL who had undergone a low or an ultralow anterior resection with colorectal or coloanal anastomosis for the treatment of rectal cancer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shalaby, Mostafa, Thabet, Waleed, Buonomo, Oreste, Lorenzo, Nicola Di, Morshed, Mosaad, Petrella, Giuseppe, Farid, Mohamed, Sileri, Pierpaolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Coloproctology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30572421
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.10.18
_version_ 1783389922972925952
author Shalaby, Mostafa
Thabet, Waleed
Buonomo, Oreste
Lorenzo, Nicola Di
Morshed, Mosaad
Petrella, Giuseppe
Farid, Mohamed
Sileri, Pierpaolo
author_facet Shalaby, Mostafa
Thabet, Waleed
Buonomo, Oreste
Lorenzo, Nicola Di
Morshed, Mosaad
Petrella, Giuseppe
Farid, Mohamed
Sileri, Pierpaolo
author_sort Shalaby, Mostafa
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We evaluate the role of transanal tube drainage (TD) as a conservative treatment for patients with anastomotic leakage (AL). METHODS: Patients treated for AL who had undergone a low or an ultralow anterior resection with colorectal or coloanal anastomosis for the treatment of rectal cancer between January 2013 and January 2017 were enrolled in this study. The data were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcomes were the diagnosis and the management of AL. RESULTS: Two hundred thirteen consecutive patients, 122 males and 91 females, were included. The mean age was 66.91 ± 11.15 years, and the median body mass index was 24 kg/m(2) (range, 20–35 kg/m(2)). The median tumor distance from the anal verge was 8 cm (range, 4–12 cm). Ninety-three patients (44%) received neoadjuvant therapy for nodal disease and/or locally advanced rectal cancer. Only 13 patients (6%) developed AL. Six patients developed subclinical AL as they had a defunctioning ileostomy at the time of the initial procedure. They were treated conservatively with TD under endoscopic guidance in the endoscopy unit and received intravenous antibiotics. Six weeks after discharge, these 6 patients underwent follow-up flexible sigmoidoscopy which showed a completely healed anastomotic defect with no residual stenosis. Seven patients developed a clinically significant AL and required reoperation with pelvic abscess drainage and Hartmann colostomy formation. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that TD for management of patients with AL is safe, cheap, and effective. Salvaging the anastomosis will help decrease the need for Hartmann colostomy formation. Proper patient selection is important.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6347340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Society of Coloproctology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63473402019-02-04 Transanal Tube Drainage as a Conservative Treatment for Anastomotic Leakage Following a Rectal Resection Shalaby, Mostafa Thabet, Waleed Buonomo, Oreste Lorenzo, Nicola Di Morshed, Mosaad Petrella, Giuseppe Farid, Mohamed Sileri, Pierpaolo Ann Coloproctol Original Article PURPOSE: We evaluate the role of transanal tube drainage (TD) as a conservative treatment for patients with anastomotic leakage (AL). METHODS: Patients treated for AL who had undergone a low or an ultralow anterior resection with colorectal or coloanal anastomosis for the treatment of rectal cancer between January 2013 and January 2017 were enrolled in this study. The data were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcomes were the diagnosis and the management of AL. RESULTS: Two hundred thirteen consecutive patients, 122 males and 91 females, were included. The mean age was 66.91 ± 11.15 years, and the median body mass index was 24 kg/m(2) (range, 20–35 kg/m(2)). The median tumor distance from the anal verge was 8 cm (range, 4–12 cm). Ninety-three patients (44%) received neoadjuvant therapy for nodal disease and/or locally advanced rectal cancer. Only 13 patients (6%) developed AL. Six patients developed subclinical AL as they had a defunctioning ileostomy at the time of the initial procedure. They were treated conservatively with TD under endoscopic guidance in the endoscopy unit and received intravenous antibiotics. Six weeks after discharge, these 6 patients underwent follow-up flexible sigmoidoscopy which showed a completely healed anastomotic defect with no residual stenosis. Seven patients developed a clinically significant AL and required reoperation with pelvic abscess drainage and Hartmann colostomy formation. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that TD for management of patients with AL is safe, cheap, and effective. Salvaging the anastomosis will help decrease the need for Hartmann colostomy formation. Proper patient selection is important. Korean Society of Coloproctology 2018-12 2018-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6347340/ /pubmed/30572421 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.10.18 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Korean Society of Coloproctology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shalaby, Mostafa
Thabet, Waleed
Buonomo, Oreste
Lorenzo, Nicola Di
Morshed, Mosaad
Petrella, Giuseppe
Farid, Mohamed
Sileri, Pierpaolo
Transanal Tube Drainage as a Conservative Treatment for Anastomotic Leakage Following a Rectal Resection
title Transanal Tube Drainage as a Conservative Treatment for Anastomotic Leakage Following a Rectal Resection
title_full Transanal Tube Drainage as a Conservative Treatment for Anastomotic Leakage Following a Rectal Resection
title_fullStr Transanal Tube Drainage as a Conservative Treatment for Anastomotic Leakage Following a Rectal Resection
title_full_unstemmed Transanal Tube Drainage as a Conservative Treatment for Anastomotic Leakage Following a Rectal Resection
title_short Transanal Tube Drainage as a Conservative Treatment for Anastomotic Leakage Following a Rectal Resection
title_sort transanal tube drainage as a conservative treatment for anastomotic leakage following a rectal resection
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30572421
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.10.18
work_keys_str_mv AT shalabymostafa transanaltubedrainageasaconservativetreatmentforanastomoticleakagefollowingarectalresection
AT thabetwaleed transanaltubedrainageasaconservativetreatmentforanastomoticleakagefollowingarectalresection
AT buonomooreste transanaltubedrainageasaconservativetreatmentforanastomoticleakagefollowingarectalresection
AT lorenzonicoladi transanaltubedrainageasaconservativetreatmentforanastomoticleakagefollowingarectalresection
AT morshedmosaad transanaltubedrainageasaconservativetreatmentforanastomoticleakagefollowingarectalresection
AT petrellagiuseppe transanaltubedrainageasaconservativetreatmentforanastomoticleakagefollowingarectalresection
AT faridmohamed transanaltubedrainageasaconservativetreatmentforanastomoticleakagefollowingarectalresection
AT sileripierpaolo transanaltubedrainageasaconservativetreatmentforanastomoticleakagefollowingarectalresection