Cargando…
Transanal Tube Drainage as a Conservative Treatment for Anastomotic Leakage Following a Rectal Resection
PURPOSE: We evaluate the role of transanal tube drainage (TD) as a conservative treatment for patients with anastomotic leakage (AL). METHODS: Patients treated for AL who had undergone a low or an ultralow anterior resection with colorectal or coloanal anastomosis for the treatment of rectal cancer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Coloproctology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30572421 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.10.18 |
_version_ | 1783389922972925952 |
---|---|
author | Shalaby, Mostafa Thabet, Waleed Buonomo, Oreste Lorenzo, Nicola Di Morshed, Mosaad Petrella, Giuseppe Farid, Mohamed Sileri, Pierpaolo |
author_facet | Shalaby, Mostafa Thabet, Waleed Buonomo, Oreste Lorenzo, Nicola Di Morshed, Mosaad Petrella, Giuseppe Farid, Mohamed Sileri, Pierpaolo |
author_sort | Shalaby, Mostafa |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: We evaluate the role of transanal tube drainage (TD) as a conservative treatment for patients with anastomotic leakage (AL). METHODS: Patients treated for AL who had undergone a low or an ultralow anterior resection with colorectal or coloanal anastomosis for the treatment of rectal cancer between January 2013 and January 2017 were enrolled in this study. The data were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcomes were the diagnosis and the management of AL. RESULTS: Two hundred thirteen consecutive patients, 122 males and 91 females, were included. The mean age was 66.91 ± 11.15 years, and the median body mass index was 24 kg/m(2) (range, 20–35 kg/m(2)). The median tumor distance from the anal verge was 8 cm (range, 4–12 cm). Ninety-three patients (44%) received neoadjuvant therapy for nodal disease and/or locally advanced rectal cancer. Only 13 patients (6%) developed AL. Six patients developed subclinical AL as they had a defunctioning ileostomy at the time of the initial procedure. They were treated conservatively with TD under endoscopic guidance in the endoscopy unit and received intravenous antibiotics. Six weeks after discharge, these 6 patients underwent follow-up flexible sigmoidoscopy which showed a completely healed anastomotic defect with no residual stenosis. Seven patients developed a clinically significant AL and required reoperation with pelvic abscess drainage and Hartmann colostomy formation. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that TD for management of patients with AL is safe, cheap, and effective. Salvaging the anastomosis will help decrease the need for Hartmann colostomy formation. Proper patient selection is important. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6347340 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Korean Society of Coloproctology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63473402019-02-04 Transanal Tube Drainage as a Conservative Treatment for Anastomotic Leakage Following a Rectal Resection Shalaby, Mostafa Thabet, Waleed Buonomo, Oreste Lorenzo, Nicola Di Morshed, Mosaad Petrella, Giuseppe Farid, Mohamed Sileri, Pierpaolo Ann Coloproctol Original Article PURPOSE: We evaluate the role of transanal tube drainage (TD) as a conservative treatment for patients with anastomotic leakage (AL). METHODS: Patients treated for AL who had undergone a low or an ultralow anterior resection with colorectal or coloanal anastomosis for the treatment of rectal cancer between January 2013 and January 2017 were enrolled in this study. The data were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcomes were the diagnosis and the management of AL. RESULTS: Two hundred thirteen consecutive patients, 122 males and 91 females, were included. The mean age was 66.91 ± 11.15 years, and the median body mass index was 24 kg/m(2) (range, 20–35 kg/m(2)). The median tumor distance from the anal verge was 8 cm (range, 4–12 cm). Ninety-three patients (44%) received neoadjuvant therapy for nodal disease and/or locally advanced rectal cancer. Only 13 patients (6%) developed AL. Six patients developed subclinical AL as they had a defunctioning ileostomy at the time of the initial procedure. They were treated conservatively with TD under endoscopic guidance in the endoscopy unit and received intravenous antibiotics. Six weeks after discharge, these 6 patients underwent follow-up flexible sigmoidoscopy which showed a completely healed anastomotic defect with no residual stenosis. Seven patients developed a clinically significant AL and required reoperation with pelvic abscess drainage and Hartmann colostomy formation. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that TD for management of patients with AL is safe, cheap, and effective. Salvaging the anastomosis will help decrease the need for Hartmann colostomy formation. Proper patient selection is important. Korean Society of Coloproctology 2018-12 2018-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6347340/ /pubmed/30572421 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.10.18 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Korean Society of Coloproctology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Shalaby, Mostafa Thabet, Waleed Buonomo, Oreste Lorenzo, Nicola Di Morshed, Mosaad Petrella, Giuseppe Farid, Mohamed Sileri, Pierpaolo Transanal Tube Drainage as a Conservative Treatment for Anastomotic Leakage Following a Rectal Resection |
title | Transanal Tube Drainage as a Conservative Treatment for Anastomotic Leakage Following a Rectal Resection |
title_full | Transanal Tube Drainage as a Conservative Treatment for Anastomotic Leakage Following a Rectal Resection |
title_fullStr | Transanal Tube Drainage as a Conservative Treatment for Anastomotic Leakage Following a Rectal Resection |
title_full_unstemmed | Transanal Tube Drainage as a Conservative Treatment for Anastomotic Leakage Following a Rectal Resection |
title_short | Transanal Tube Drainage as a Conservative Treatment for Anastomotic Leakage Following a Rectal Resection |
title_sort | transanal tube drainage as a conservative treatment for anastomotic leakage following a rectal resection |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30572421 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.10.18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shalabymostafa transanaltubedrainageasaconservativetreatmentforanastomoticleakagefollowingarectalresection AT thabetwaleed transanaltubedrainageasaconservativetreatmentforanastomoticleakagefollowingarectalresection AT buonomooreste transanaltubedrainageasaconservativetreatmentforanastomoticleakagefollowingarectalresection AT lorenzonicoladi transanaltubedrainageasaconservativetreatmentforanastomoticleakagefollowingarectalresection AT morshedmosaad transanaltubedrainageasaconservativetreatmentforanastomoticleakagefollowingarectalresection AT petrellagiuseppe transanaltubedrainageasaconservativetreatmentforanastomoticleakagefollowingarectalresection AT faridmohamed transanaltubedrainageasaconservativetreatmentforanastomoticleakagefollowingarectalresection AT sileripierpaolo transanaltubedrainageasaconservativetreatmentforanastomoticleakagefollowingarectalresection |