Cargando…

Update on biomarkers of glycemic control

Attaining and maintaining good glycemic control is a cornerstone of diabetes care. The monitoring of glycemic control is currently based on the self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) and laboratory testing for hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), which is a surrogate biochemical marker of the average glycemia l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krhač, Maja, Lovrenčić, Marijana Vučić
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30697366
http://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v10.i1.1
_version_ 1783389961585688576
author Krhač, Maja
Lovrenčić, Marijana Vučić
author_facet Krhač, Maja
Lovrenčić, Marijana Vučić
author_sort Krhač, Maja
collection PubMed
description Attaining and maintaining good glycemic control is a cornerstone of diabetes care. The monitoring of glycemic control is currently based on the self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) and laboratory testing for hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), which is a surrogate biochemical marker of the average glycemia level over the previous 2-3 mo period. Although hyperglycemia is a key biochemical feature of diabetes, both the level of and exposure to high glucose, as well as glycemic variability, contribute to the pathogenesis of diabetic complications and follow different patterns in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. HbA1c provides a valuable, standardized and evidence-based parameter that is relevant for clinical decision making, but several biological and analytical confounders limit its accuracy in reflecting true glycemia. It has become apparent in recent years that other glycated proteins such as fructosamine, glycated albumin, and the nutritional monosaccharide 1,5-anhydroglucitol, as well as integrated measures from direct glucose testing by an SMBG/continuous glucose monitoring system, may provide valuable complementary data, particularly in circumstances when HbA1c results may be unreliable or are insufficient to assess the risk of adverse outcomes. Long-term associations of these alternative biomarkers of glycemia with the risk of complications need to be investigated in order to provide clinically relevant cut-off values and to validate their utility in diverse populations of diabetes patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6347654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63476542019-01-29 Update on biomarkers of glycemic control Krhač, Maja Lovrenčić, Marijana Vučić World J Diabetes Review Attaining and maintaining good glycemic control is a cornerstone of diabetes care. The monitoring of glycemic control is currently based on the self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) and laboratory testing for hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), which is a surrogate biochemical marker of the average glycemia level over the previous 2-3 mo period. Although hyperglycemia is a key biochemical feature of diabetes, both the level of and exposure to high glucose, as well as glycemic variability, contribute to the pathogenesis of diabetic complications and follow different patterns in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. HbA1c provides a valuable, standardized and evidence-based parameter that is relevant for clinical decision making, but several biological and analytical confounders limit its accuracy in reflecting true glycemia. It has become apparent in recent years that other glycated proteins such as fructosamine, glycated albumin, and the nutritional monosaccharide 1,5-anhydroglucitol, as well as integrated measures from direct glucose testing by an SMBG/continuous glucose monitoring system, may provide valuable complementary data, particularly in circumstances when HbA1c results may be unreliable or are insufficient to assess the risk of adverse outcomes. Long-term associations of these alternative biomarkers of glycemia with the risk of complications need to be investigated in order to provide clinically relevant cut-off values and to validate their utility in diverse populations of diabetes patients. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019-01-15 2019-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6347654/ /pubmed/30697366 http://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v10.i1.1 Text en ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Review
Krhač, Maja
Lovrenčić, Marijana Vučić
Update on biomarkers of glycemic control
title Update on biomarkers of glycemic control
title_full Update on biomarkers of glycemic control
title_fullStr Update on biomarkers of glycemic control
title_full_unstemmed Update on biomarkers of glycemic control
title_short Update on biomarkers of glycemic control
title_sort update on biomarkers of glycemic control
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30697366
http://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v10.i1.1
work_keys_str_mv AT krhacmaja updateonbiomarkersofglycemiccontrol
AT lovrencicmarijanavucic updateonbiomarkersofglycemiccontrol