Cargando…

Mixed feelings: general practitioners’ attitudes towards eHealth for stress urinary incontinence - a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is the most prevalent subtype of urinary incontinence and is a bothering condition in women. Only a minority of those with SUI consult a general practitioner (GP). EHealth with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is effective in reducing incontinence sym...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Firet, Lotte, de Bree, Chrissy, Verhoeks, Carmen M., Teunissen, Doreth A. M., Lagro-Janssen, Antoine L. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30684962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0907-x
_version_ 1783389973447180288
author Firet, Lotte
de Bree, Chrissy
Verhoeks, Carmen M.
Teunissen, Doreth A. M.
Lagro-Janssen, Antoine L. M.
author_facet Firet, Lotte
de Bree, Chrissy
Verhoeks, Carmen M.
Teunissen, Doreth A. M.
Lagro-Janssen, Antoine L. M.
author_sort Firet, Lotte
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is the most prevalent subtype of urinary incontinence and is a bothering condition in women. Only a minority of those with SUI consult a general practitioner (GP). EHealth with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is effective in reducing incontinence symptoms and might increase access to care. The role of the GP regarding such an eHealth intervention is unknown. The aim of the study is to gain insight into the attitudes towards a PFMT internet-based, eHealth, intervention for SUI. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews among purposively sampled GPs. Audio records were fully transcribed, and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Thirteen GPs were interviewed, nine females and four males. Three themes emerged: appraisal of eHealth as a welcome new tool, mixed feelings about a supportive role, and eHealth is no cure-all. GPs welcomed eHealth for SUI as matching their preferences for PFMT and having advantages for patients. With eHealth as stand-alone therapy GPs were concerned about the lack of feedback, and the loss of motivation to adhere to the intervention. Therefore, GPs considered personal support important. The GP’s decision to recommend eHealth was strongly influenced by a woman’s motivation and her age. GPs’ treatment preferences for elderly are different from those for young women with SUI; both PFMT and eHealth are perceived less suitable for older women. CONCLUSION: EHealth with PFMT fits into the GPs’ routine practice of SUI and adds value to it. Although there is evidence that eHealth as a stand-alone intervention is effective, GPs consider personal support important to supplement the perceived shortcomings. Probably GPs are not aware of, or convinced of the existing evidence. Training should address this issue and should also focus on common misunderstandings about regular care for women with SUI, such as the idea that PFMT is not suitable for the elderly. Improving GPs’ knowledge that eHealth can be a stand-alone therapy for SUI facilitates the implementation in daily care. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-019-0907-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6347743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63477432019-01-30 Mixed feelings: general practitioners’ attitudes towards eHealth for stress urinary incontinence - a qualitative study Firet, Lotte de Bree, Chrissy Verhoeks, Carmen M. Teunissen, Doreth A. M. Lagro-Janssen, Antoine L. M. BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is the most prevalent subtype of urinary incontinence and is a bothering condition in women. Only a minority of those with SUI consult a general practitioner (GP). EHealth with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is effective in reducing incontinence symptoms and might increase access to care. The role of the GP regarding such an eHealth intervention is unknown. The aim of the study is to gain insight into the attitudes towards a PFMT internet-based, eHealth, intervention for SUI. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews among purposively sampled GPs. Audio records were fully transcribed, and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Thirteen GPs were interviewed, nine females and four males. Three themes emerged: appraisal of eHealth as a welcome new tool, mixed feelings about a supportive role, and eHealth is no cure-all. GPs welcomed eHealth for SUI as matching their preferences for PFMT and having advantages for patients. With eHealth as stand-alone therapy GPs were concerned about the lack of feedback, and the loss of motivation to adhere to the intervention. Therefore, GPs considered personal support important. The GP’s decision to recommend eHealth was strongly influenced by a woman’s motivation and her age. GPs’ treatment preferences for elderly are different from those for young women with SUI; both PFMT and eHealth are perceived less suitable for older women. CONCLUSION: EHealth with PFMT fits into the GPs’ routine practice of SUI and adds value to it. Although there is evidence that eHealth as a stand-alone intervention is effective, GPs consider personal support important to supplement the perceived shortcomings. Probably GPs are not aware of, or convinced of the existing evidence. Training should address this issue and should also focus on common misunderstandings about regular care for women with SUI, such as the idea that PFMT is not suitable for the elderly. Improving GPs’ knowledge that eHealth can be a stand-alone therapy for SUI facilitates the implementation in daily care. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-019-0907-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6347743/ /pubmed/30684962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0907-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Firet, Lotte
de Bree, Chrissy
Verhoeks, Carmen M.
Teunissen, Doreth A. M.
Lagro-Janssen, Antoine L. M.
Mixed feelings: general practitioners’ attitudes towards eHealth for stress urinary incontinence - a qualitative study
title Mixed feelings: general practitioners’ attitudes towards eHealth for stress urinary incontinence - a qualitative study
title_full Mixed feelings: general practitioners’ attitudes towards eHealth for stress urinary incontinence - a qualitative study
title_fullStr Mixed feelings: general practitioners’ attitudes towards eHealth for stress urinary incontinence - a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Mixed feelings: general practitioners’ attitudes towards eHealth for stress urinary incontinence - a qualitative study
title_short Mixed feelings: general practitioners’ attitudes towards eHealth for stress urinary incontinence - a qualitative study
title_sort mixed feelings: general practitioners’ attitudes towards ehealth for stress urinary incontinence - a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30684962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0907-x
work_keys_str_mv AT firetlotte mixedfeelingsgeneralpractitionersattitudestowardsehealthforstressurinaryincontinenceaqualitativestudy
AT debreechrissy mixedfeelingsgeneralpractitionersattitudestowardsehealthforstressurinaryincontinenceaqualitativestudy
AT verhoekscarmenm mixedfeelingsgeneralpractitionersattitudestowardsehealthforstressurinaryincontinenceaqualitativestudy
AT teunissendoretham mixedfeelingsgeneralpractitionersattitudestowardsehealthforstressurinaryincontinenceaqualitativestudy
AT lagrojanssenantoinelm mixedfeelingsgeneralpractitionersattitudestowardsehealthforstressurinaryincontinenceaqualitativestudy