Cargando…

Comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Both manual therapy techniques and dry needling have shown to be effective treatment options for the treatment of plantar heel pain; however, in recent years, other techniques based on dry needling (DN), such as percutaneous needle electrolysis (PNE), have also emerged. Currently, PNE is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Boloushi, Zaid, Gómez-Trullén, Eva María, Bellosta-López, Pablo, López-Royo, María Pilar, Fernández, Daniel, Herrero, Pablo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30683124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1066-4
_version_ 1783389978109149184
author Al-Boloushi, Zaid
Gómez-Trullén, Eva María
Bellosta-López, Pablo
López-Royo, María Pilar
Fernández, Daniel
Herrero, Pablo
author_facet Al-Boloushi, Zaid
Gómez-Trullén, Eva María
Bellosta-López, Pablo
López-Royo, María Pilar
Fernández, Daniel
Herrero, Pablo
author_sort Al-Boloushi, Zaid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Both manual therapy techniques and dry needling have shown to be effective treatment options for the treatment of plantar heel pain; however, in recent years, other techniques based on dry needling (DN), such as percutaneous needle electrolysis (PNE), have also emerged. Currently, PNE is being used in clinical practice to manage myofascial trigger points, despite the lack of studies comparing the effects of this technique over dry needling. Therefore, the aim of this randomized controlled study is to compare the effectiveness of DN versus PNE for improving the level of pain experienced by patients suffering from plantar heel pain provoked by myofascial trigger points. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial will be conducted with blinded participants and outcome assessors. A sample of 94 patients with a medical diagnosis of plantar heel pain will be recruited and divided into two treatment groups. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated to either (a) treatment group with DN and a self-stretching home program or (b) treatment group with PNE and a self-stretching home program. Each group will receive one treatment session per week over a period of 4 weeks. The primary outcome measure will be the pain subscale of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire. The secondary outcome measures will be a visual analogue scale for pain (average and highest level of pain experienced during the previous 48 h; level of pain immediately after the treatment session) and health-related quality of life (assessed using the EuroQoL-5 dimensions). Cost-effectiveness data will be extracted based on the EuroQoL-5 dimensions. Follow-up measurements will take place at baseline and at 4, 8, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. DISCUSSION: The justification for this trial is the need to improve current understanding regarding the effectiveness of treatments targeting the rehabilitation of plantar heel pain. This study will be the first randomized controlled trial to directly compare the effectiveness of DN and PNE combined with a specific stretching program for the treatment of plantar heel pain provoked by myofascial trigger points. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials NCT03236779. Registered at clinicaltrials.gov 2 August 2017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6347763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63477632019-01-30 Comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial Al-Boloushi, Zaid Gómez-Trullén, Eva María Bellosta-López, Pablo López-Royo, María Pilar Fernández, Daniel Herrero, Pablo J Orthop Surg Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Both manual therapy techniques and dry needling have shown to be effective treatment options for the treatment of plantar heel pain; however, in recent years, other techniques based on dry needling (DN), such as percutaneous needle electrolysis (PNE), have also emerged. Currently, PNE is being used in clinical practice to manage myofascial trigger points, despite the lack of studies comparing the effects of this technique over dry needling. Therefore, the aim of this randomized controlled study is to compare the effectiveness of DN versus PNE for improving the level of pain experienced by patients suffering from plantar heel pain provoked by myofascial trigger points. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial will be conducted with blinded participants and outcome assessors. A sample of 94 patients with a medical diagnosis of plantar heel pain will be recruited and divided into two treatment groups. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated to either (a) treatment group with DN and a self-stretching home program or (b) treatment group with PNE and a self-stretching home program. Each group will receive one treatment session per week over a period of 4 weeks. The primary outcome measure will be the pain subscale of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire. The secondary outcome measures will be a visual analogue scale for pain (average and highest level of pain experienced during the previous 48 h; level of pain immediately after the treatment session) and health-related quality of life (assessed using the EuroQoL-5 dimensions). Cost-effectiveness data will be extracted based on the EuroQoL-5 dimensions. Follow-up measurements will take place at baseline and at 4, 8, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. DISCUSSION: The justification for this trial is the need to improve current understanding regarding the effectiveness of treatments targeting the rehabilitation of plantar heel pain. This study will be the first randomized controlled trial to directly compare the effectiveness of DN and PNE combined with a specific stretching program for the treatment of plantar heel pain provoked by myofascial trigger points. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials NCT03236779. Registered at clinicaltrials.gov 2 August 2017. BioMed Central 2019-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6347763/ /pubmed/30683124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1066-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Al-Boloushi, Zaid
Gómez-Trullén, Eva María
Bellosta-López, Pablo
López-Royo, María Pilar
Fernández, Daniel
Herrero, Pablo
Comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30683124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1066-4
work_keys_str_mv AT alboloushizaid comparingtwodryneedlinginterventionsforplantarheelpainaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gomeztrullenevamaria comparingtwodryneedlinginterventionsforplantarheelpainaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bellostalopezpablo comparingtwodryneedlinginterventionsforplantarheelpainaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lopezroyomariapilar comparingtwodryneedlinginterventionsforplantarheelpainaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fernandezdaniel comparingtwodryneedlinginterventionsforplantarheelpainaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT herreropablo comparingtwodryneedlinginterventionsforplantarheelpainaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial