Cargando…
Comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Both manual therapy techniques and dry needling have shown to be effective treatment options for the treatment of plantar heel pain; however, in recent years, other techniques based on dry needling (DN), such as percutaneous needle electrolysis (PNE), have also emerged. Currently, PNE is...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30683124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1066-4 |
_version_ | 1783389978109149184 |
---|---|
author | Al-Boloushi, Zaid Gómez-Trullén, Eva María Bellosta-López, Pablo López-Royo, María Pilar Fernández, Daniel Herrero, Pablo |
author_facet | Al-Boloushi, Zaid Gómez-Trullén, Eva María Bellosta-López, Pablo López-Royo, María Pilar Fernández, Daniel Herrero, Pablo |
author_sort | Al-Boloushi, Zaid |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Both manual therapy techniques and dry needling have shown to be effective treatment options for the treatment of plantar heel pain; however, in recent years, other techniques based on dry needling (DN), such as percutaneous needle electrolysis (PNE), have also emerged. Currently, PNE is being used in clinical practice to manage myofascial trigger points, despite the lack of studies comparing the effects of this technique over dry needling. Therefore, the aim of this randomized controlled study is to compare the effectiveness of DN versus PNE for improving the level of pain experienced by patients suffering from plantar heel pain provoked by myofascial trigger points. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial will be conducted with blinded participants and outcome assessors. A sample of 94 patients with a medical diagnosis of plantar heel pain will be recruited and divided into two treatment groups. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated to either (a) treatment group with DN and a self-stretching home program or (b) treatment group with PNE and a self-stretching home program. Each group will receive one treatment session per week over a period of 4 weeks. The primary outcome measure will be the pain subscale of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire. The secondary outcome measures will be a visual analogue scale for pain (average and highest level of pain experienced during the previous 48 h; level of pain immediately after the treatment session) and health-related quality of life (assessed using the EuroQoL-5 dimensions). Cost-effectiveness data will be extracted based on the EuroQoL-5 dimensions. Follow-up measurements will take place at baseline and at 4, 8, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. DISCUSSION: The justification for this trial is the need to improve current understanding regarding the effectiveness of treatments targeting the rehabilitation of plantar heel pain. This study will be the first randomized controlled trial to directly compare the effectiveness of DN and PNE combined with a specific stretching program for the treatment of plantar heel pain provoked by myofascial trigger points. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials NCT03236779. Registered at clinicaltrials.gov 2 August 2017. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6347763 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63477632019-01-30 Comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial Al-Boloushi, Zaid Gómez-Trullén, Eva María Bellosta-López, Pablo López-Royo, María Pilar Fernández, Daniel Herrero, Pablo J Orthop Surg Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Both manual therapy techniques and dry needling have shown to be effective treatment options for the treatment of plantar heel pain; however, in recent years, other techniques based on dry needling (DN), such as percutaneous needle electrolysis (PNE), have also emerged. Currently, PNE is being used in clinical practice to manage myofascial trigger points, despite the lack of studies comparing the effects of this technique over dry needling. Therefore, the aim of this randomized controlled study is to compare the effectiveness of DN versus PNE for improving the level of pain experienced by patients suffering from plantar heel pain provoked by myofascial trigger points. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial will be conducted with blinded participants and outcome assessors. A sample of 94 patients with a medical diagnosis of plantar heel pain will be recruited and divided into two treatment groups. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated to either (a) treatment group with DN and a self-stretching home program or (b) treatment group with PNE and a self-stretching home program. Each group will receive one treatment session per week over a period of 4 weeks. The primary outcome measure will be the pain subscale of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire. The secondary outcome measures will be a visual analogue scale for pain (average and highest level of pain experienced during the previous 48 h; level of pain immediately after the treatment session) and health-related quality of life (assessed using the EuroQoL-5 dimensions). Cost-effectiveness data will be extracted based on the EuroQoL-5 dimensions. Follow-up measurements will take place at baseline and at 4, 8, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. DISCUSSION: The justification for this trial is the need to improve current understanding regarding the effectiveness of treatments targeting the rehabilitation of plantar heel pain. This study will be the first randomized controlled trial to directly compare the effectiveness of DN and PNE combined with a specific stretching program for the treatment of plantar heel pain provoked by myofascial trigger points. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials NCT03236779. Registered at clinicaltrials.gov 2 August 2017. BioMed Central 2019-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6347763/ /pubmed/30683124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1066-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Al-Boloushi, Zaid Gómez-Trullén, Eva María Bellosta-López, Pablo López-Royo, María Pilar Fernández, Daniel Herrero, Pablo Comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30683124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1066-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alboloushizaid comparingtwodryneedlinginterventionsforplantarheelpainaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gomeztrullenevamaria comparingtwodryneedlinginterventionsforplantarheelpainaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bellostalopezpablo comparingtwodryneedlinginterventionsforplantarheelpainaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lopezroyomariapilar comparingtwodryneedlinginterventionsforplantarheelpainaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fernandezdaniel comparingtwodryneedlinginterventionsforplantarheelpainaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT herreropablo comparingtwodryneedlinginterventionsforplantarheelpainaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |