Cargando…

Transarticular tibiotalocalcaneal nailing versus open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of the elderly ankle fracture: protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Ankle fractures are common in the elderly population. Surgical fixation is technically challenging and often results in complications due to high rates of osteoporosis and vascular disease. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) often requires prolonged periods of non-weight beari...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tuckett, Paul, Hope, Matthew, Tetsworth, Kevin, Van De Pol, Jerry, McDougall, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30670529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026360
_version_ 1783390007438868480
author Tuckett, Paul
Hope, Matthew
Tetsworth, Kevin
Van De Pol, Jerry
McDougall, Catherine
author_facet Tuckett, Paul
Hope, Matthew
Tetsworth, Kevin
Van De Pol, Jerry
McDougall, Catherine
author_sort Tuckett, Paul
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Ankle fractures are common in the elderly population. Surgical fixation is technically challenging and often results in complications due to high rates of osteoporosis and vascular disease. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) often requires prolonged periods of non-weight bearing increasing the risks of complications. Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) nailing has been suggested as an alternative to ORIF which allows immediate weight bearing, and is suggested to result in fewer complications. This study aims to compare the two surgical techniques in the elderly population with ankle fractures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study will be a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing ORIF to TTC nailing in 110 patients with ankle fractures aged 50 or above with a Charlson Comorbidity Index of greater than or equal to four. Participants and assessors will not be blinded to intervention. The primary outcome measure will be overall complication rate. Secondary outcomes include length of hospital stay, mobility at discharge, discharge destination, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot score, the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score, mortality rate, rate of secondary surgical interventions and number of blood transfusions required postoperatively. Our null hypothesis is that there is no clinically significant difference in the primary outcome measure between the two treatment groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by Metro South Hospital and Health Services Human Research Ethics Committee (EC00167) (reference number HREC/17/QPAH/351). DISCUSSION: Completion of this trial will provide evidence on the effectiveness of TTC nailing versus ORIF in treatment of the elderly ankle fracture. If TTC nailing is found to result in superior outcomes, this trial has the capacity to change current clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12617001588381;Pre-results andU1111-1203-1704.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6347874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63478742019-02-08 Transarticular tibiotalocalcaneal nailing versus open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of the elderly ankle fracture: protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial Tuckett, Paul Hope, Matthew Tetsworth, Kevin Van De Pol, Jerry McDougall, Catherine BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Ankle fractures are common in the elderly population. Surgical fixation is technically challenging and often results in complications due to high rates of osteoporosis and vascular disease. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) often requires prolonged periods of non-weight bearing increasing the risks of complications. Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) nailing has been suggested as an alternative to ORIF which allows immediate weight bearing, and is suggested to result in fewer complications. This study aims to compare the two surgical techniques in the elderly population with ankle fractures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study will be a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing ORIF to TTC nailing in 110 patients with ankle fractures aged 50 or above with a Charlson Comorbidity Index of greater than or equal to four. Participants and assessors will not be blinded to intervention. The primary outcome measure will be overall complication rate. Secondary outcomes include length of hospital stay, mobility at discharge, discharge destination, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot score, the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score, mortality rate, rate of secondary surgical interventions and number of blood transfusions required postoperatively. Our null hypothesis is that there is no clinically significant difference in the primary outcome measure between the two treatment groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by Metro South Hospital and Health Services Human Research Ethics Committee (EC00167) (reference number HREC/17/QPAH/351). DISCUSSION: Completion of this trial will provide evidence on the effectiveness of TTC nailing versus ORIF in treatment of the elderly ankle fracture. If TTC nailing is found to result in superior outcomes, this trial has the capacity to change current clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12617001588381;Pre-results andU1111-1203-1704. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6347874/ /pubmed/30670529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026360 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Surgery
Tuckett, Paul
Hope, Matthew
Tetsworth, Kevin
Van De Pol, Jerry
McDougall, Catherine
Transarticular tibiotalocalcaneal nailing versus open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of the elderly ankle fracture: protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial
title Transarticular tibiotalocalcaneal nailing versus open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of the elderly ankle fracture: protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial
title_full Transarticular tibiotalocalcaneal nailing versus open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of the elderly ankle fracture: protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Transarticular tibiotalocalcaneal nailing versus open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of the elderly ankle fracture: protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Transarticular tibiotalocalcaneal nailing versus open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of the elderly ankle fracture: protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial
title_short Transarticular tibiotalocalcaneal nailing versus open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of the elderly ankle fracture: protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial
title_sort transarticular tibiotalocalcaneal nailing versus open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of the elderly ankle fracture: protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30670529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026360
work_keys_str_mv AT tuckettpaul transarticulartibiotalocalcanealnailingversusopenreductionandinternalfixationfortreatmentoftheelderlyanklefractureprotocolforamulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hopematthew transarticulartibiotalocalcanealnailingversusopenreductionandinternalfixationfortreatmentoftheelderlyanklefractureprotocolforamulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tetsworthkevin transarticulartibiotalocalcanealnailingversusopenreductionandinternalfixationfortreatmentoftheelderlyanklefractureprotocolforamulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vandepoljerry transarticulartibiotalocalcanealnailingversusopenreductionandinternalfixationfortreatmentoftheelderlyanklefractureprotocolforamulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mcdougallcatherine transarticulartibiotalocalcanealnailingversusopenreductionandinternalfixationfortreatmentoftheelderlyanklefractureprotocolforamulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial