Cargando…

Impact of surgical site infection (SSI) following gynaecological cancer surgery in the UK: a trainee-led multicentre audit and service evaluation

OBJECTIVES: Surgical site infection (SSI) complicates 5% of all surgical procedures in the UK and is a major cause of postoperative morbidity and a substantial drain on healthcare resources. Little is known about the incidence of SSI and its consequences in women undergoing surgery for gynaecologica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Donnell, Rachel L, Angelopoulos, Georgios, Beirne, James P, Biliatis, Ioannis, Bolton, Helen, Bradbury, Melissa, Craig, Elaine, Gajjar, Ketan, Mackintosh, Michelle L, MacNab, Wendy, Madhuri, Thumuluru Kavitha, McComiskey, Mark, Myriokefalitaki, Eva, Newton, Claire L, Ratnavelu, Nithya, Taylor, Sian E, Thangavelu, Amudha, Rhodes, Sarah A, Crosbie, Emma J, Edmondson, Richard J, Wan, Yee-Loi Louise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30679297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024853
_version_ 1783390008124637184
author O’Donnell, Rachel L
Angelopoulos, Georgios
Beirne, James P
Biliatis, Ioannis
Bolton, Helen
Bradbury, Melissa
Craig, Elaine
Gajjar, Ketan
Mackintosh, Michelle L
MacNab, Wendy
Madhuri, Thumuluru Kavitha
McComiskey, Mark
Myriokefalitaki, Eva
Newton, Claire L
Ratnavelu, Nithya
Taylor, Sian E
Thangavelu, Amudha
Rhodes, Sarah A
Crosbie, Emma J
Edmondson, Richard J
Wan, Yee-Loi Louise
author_facet O’Donnell, Rachel L
Angelopoulos, Georgios
Beirne, James P
Biliatis, Ioannis
Bolton, Helen
Bradbury, Melissa
Craig, Elaine
Gajjar, Ketan
Mackintosh, Michelle L
MacNab, Wendy
Madhuri, Thumuluru Kavitha
McComiskey, Mark
Myriokefalitaki, Eva
Newton, Claire L
Ratnavelu, Nithya
Taylor, Sian E
Thangavelu, Amudha
Rhodes, Sarah A
Crosbie, Emma J
Edmondson, Richard J
Wan, Yee-Loi Louise
author_sort O’Donnell, Rachel L
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Surgical site infection (SSI) complicates 5% of all surgical procedures in the UK and is a major cause of postoperative morbidity and a substantial drain on healthcare resources. Little is known about the incidence of SSI and its consequences in women undergoing surgery for gynaecological cancer. Our aim was to perform the first national audit of SSI following gynaecological cancer surgery through the establishment of a UK-wide trainee-led research network. DESIGN AND SETTING: In a prospective audit, we collected data from all women undergoing laparotomy for suspected gynaecological cancer at 12 specialist oncology centres in the UK during an 8-week period in 2015. Clinicopathological data were collected, and wound complications and their sequelae were recorded during the 30 days following surgery. RESULTS: In total, 339 women underwent laparotomy for suspected gynaecological cancer during the study period. A clinical diagnosis of SSI was made in 54 (16%) women. 33% (18/54) of women with SSI had prolonged hospital stays, and 11/37 (29%) had their adjuvant treatment delayed or cancelled. Multivariate analysis found body mass index (BMI) was the strongest risk factor for SSI (OR 1.08[95% CI 1.03 to 1.14] per 1 kg/m(2) increase in BMI [p=0.001]). Wound drains (OR 2.92[95% CI 1.41 to 6.04], p=0.004) and staple closure (OR 3.13[95% CI 1.50 to 6.56], p=0.002) were also associated with increased risk of SSI. CONCLUSIONS: SSI is common in women undergoing surgery for gynaecological cancer leading to delays in discharge and adjuvant treatment. Resultant delays in adjuvant treatment may impact cancer-specific survival rates. Modifiable factors, such as choice of wound closure material, offer opportunities for reducing SSI and reducing morbidity in these women. There is a clear need for new trials in SSI prevention in this patient group; our trainee-led initiative provides a platform for their successful completion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6347877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63478772019-02-08 Impact of surgical site infection (SSI) following gynaecological cancer surgery in the UK: a trainee-led multicentre audit and service evaluation O’Donnell, Rachel L Angelopoulos, Georgios Beirne, James P Biliatis, Ioannis Bolton, Helen Bradbury, Melissa Craig, Elaine Gajjar, Ketan Mackintosh, Michelle L MacNab, Wendy Madhuri, Thumuluru Kavitha McComiskey, Mark Myriokefalitaki, Eva Newton, Claire L Ratnavelu, Nithya Taylor, Sian E Thangavelu, Amudha Rhodes, Sarah A Crosbie, Emma J Edmondson, Richard J Wan, Yee-Loi Louise BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVES: Surgical site infection (SSI) complicates 5% of all surgical procedures in the UK and is a major cause of postoperative morbidity and a substantial drain on healthcare resources. Little is known about the incidence of SSI and its consequences in women undergoing surgery for gynaecological cancer. Our aim was to perform the first national audit of SSI following gynaecological cancer surgery through the establishment of a UK-wide trainee-led research network. DESIGN AND SETTING: In a prospective audit, we collected data from all women undergoing laparotomy for suspected gynaecological cancer at 12 specialist oncology centres in the UK during an 8-week period in 2015. Clinicopathological data were collected, and wound complications and their sequelae were recorded during the 30 days following surgery. RESULTS: In total, 339 women underwent laparotomy for suspected gynaecological cancer during the study period. A clinical diagnosis of SSI was made in 54 (16%) women. 33% (18/54) of women with SSI had prolonged hospital stays, and 11/37 (29%) had their adjuvant treatment delayed or cancelled. Multivariate analysis found body mass index (BMI) was the strongest risk factor for SSI (OR 1.08[95% CI 1.03 to 1.14] per 1 kg/m(2) increase in BMI [p=0.001]). Wound drains (OR 2.92[95% CI 1.41 to 6.04], p=0.004) and staple closure (OR 3.13[95% CI 1.50 to 6.56], p=0.002) were also associated with increased risk of SSI. CONCLUSIONS: SSI is common in women undergoing surgery for gynaecological cancer leading to delays in discharge and adjuvant treatment. Resultant delays in adjuvant treatment may impact cancer-specific survival rates. Modifiable factors, such as choice of wound closure material, offer opportunities for reducing SSI and reducing morbidity in these women. There is a clear need for new trials in SSI prevention in this patient group; our trainee-led initiative provides a platform for their successful completion. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6347877/ /pubmed/30679297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024853 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
O’Donnell, Rachel L
Angelopoulos, Georgios
Beirne, James P
Biliatis, Ioannis
Bolton, Helen
Bradbury, Melissa
Craig, Elaine
Gajjar, Ketan
Mackintosh, Michelle L
MacNab, Wendy
Madhuri, Thumuluru Kavitha
McComiskey, Mark
Myriokefalitaki, Eva
Newton, Claire L
Ratnavelu, Nithya
Taylor, Sian E
Thangavelu, Amudha
Rhodes, Sarah A
Crosbie, Emma J
Edmondson, Richard J
Wan, Yee-Loi Louise
Impact of surgical site infection (SSI) following gynaecological cancer surgery in the UK: a trainee-led multicentre audit and service evaluation
title Impact of surgical site infection (SSI) following gynaecological cancer surgery in the UK: a trainee-led multicentre audit and service evaluation
title_full Impact of surgical site infection (SSI) following gynaecological cancer surgery in the UK: a trainee-led multicentre audit and service evaluation
title_fullStr Impact of surgical site infection (SSI) following gynaecological cancer surgery in the UK: a trainee-led multicentre audit and service evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Impact of surgical site infection (SSI) following gynaecological cancer surgery in the UK: a trainee-led multicentre audit and service evaluation
title_short Impact of surgical site infection (SSI) following gynaecological cancer surgery in the UK: a trainee-led multicentre audit and service evaluation
title_sort impact of surgical site infection (ssi) following gynaecological cancer surgery in the uk: a trainee-led multicentre audit and service evaluation
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30679297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024853
work_keys_str_mv AT odonnellrachell impactofsurgicalsiteinfectionssifollowinggynaecologicalcancersurgeryintheukatraineeledmulticentreauditandserviceevaluation
AT angelopoulosgeorgios impactofsurgicalsiteinfectionssifollowinggynaecologicalcancersurgeryintheukatraineeledmulticentreauditandserviceevaluation
AT beirnejamesp impactofsurgicalsiteinfectionssifollowinggynaecologicalcancersurgeryintheukatraineeledmulticentreauditandserviceevaluation
AT biliatisioannis impactofsurgicalsiteinfectionssifollowinggynaecologicalcancersurgeryintheukatraineeledmulticentreauditandserviceevaluation
AT boltonhelen impactofsurgicalsiteinfectionssifollowinggynaecologicalcancersurgeryintheukatraineeledmulticentreauditandserviceevaluation
AT bradburymelissa impactofsurgicalsiteinfectionssifollowinggynaecologicalcancersurgeryintheukatraineeledmulticentreauditandserviceevaluation
AT craigelaine impactofsurgicalsiteinfectionssifollowinggynaecologicalcancersurgeryintheukatraineeledmulticentreauditandserviceevaluation
AT gajjarketan impactofsurgicalsiteinfectionssifollowinggynaecologicalcancersurgeryintheukatraineeledmulticentreauditandserviceevaluation
AT mackintoshmichellel impactofsurgicalsiteinfectionssifollowinggynaecologicalcancersurgeryintheukatraineeledmulticentreauditandserviceevaluation
AT macnabwendy impactofsurgicalsiteinfectionssifollowinggynaecologicalcancersurgeryintheukatraineeledmulticentreauditandserviceevaluation
AT madhurithumulurukavitha impactofsurgicalsiteinfectionssifollowinggynaecologicalcancersurgeryintheukatraineeledmulticentreauditandserviceevaluation
AT mccomiskeymark impactofsurgicalsiteinfectionssifollowinggynaecologicalcancersurgeryintheukatraineeledmulticentreauditandserviceevaluation
AT myriokefalitakieva impactofsurgicalsiteinfectionssifollowinggynaecologicalcancersurgeryintheukatraineeledmulticentreauditandserviceevaluation
AT newtonclairel impactofsurgicalsiteinfectionssifollowinggynaecologicalcancersurgeryintheukatraineeledmulticentreauditandserviceevaluation
AT ratnavelunithya impactofsurgicalsiteinfectionssifollowinggynaecologicalcancersurgeryintheukatraineeledmulticentreauditandserviceevaluation
AT taylorsiane impactofsurgicalsiteinfectionssifollowinggynaecologicalcancersurgeryintheukatraineeledmulticentreauditandserviceevaluation
AT thangaveluamudha impactofsurgicalsiteinfectionssifollowinggynaecologicalcancersurgeryintheukatraineeledmulticentreauditandserviceevaluation
AT rhodessaraha impactofsurgicalsiteinfectionssifollowinggynaecologicalcancersurgeryintheukatraineeledmulticentreauditandserviceevaluation
AT crosbieemmaj impactofsurgicalsiteinfectionssifollowinggynaecologicalcancersurgeryintheukatraineeledmulticentreauditandserviceevaluation
AT edmondsonrichardj impactofsurgicalsiteinfectionssifollowinggynaecologicalcancersurgeryintheukatraineeledmulticentreauditandserviceevaluation
AT wanyeeloilouise impactofsurgicalsiteinfectionssifollowinggynaecologicalcancersurgeryintheukatraineeledmulticentreauditandserviceevaluation