Cargando…

Regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (RICH) trial: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a well-recognised complication of critical illness which is of crucial importance for morbidity, mortality and health resource utilisation. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) inevitably entails an escalation of treatment complexity and increases costs for thos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meersch, Melanie, Küllmar, Mira, Wempe, Carola, Kindgen-Milles, Detlef, Kluge, Stefan, Slowinski, Torsten, Marx, Gernot, Gerss, Joachim, Zarbock, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30670518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024411
_version_ 1783390015461523456
author Meersch, Melanie
Küllmar, Mira
Wempe, Carola
Kindgen-Milles, Detlef
Kluge, Stefan
Slowinski, Torsten
Marx, Gernot
Gerss, Joachim
Zarbock, Alexander
author_facet Meersch, Melanie
Küllmar, Mira
Wempe, Carola
Kindgen-Milles, Detlef
Kluge, Stefan
Slowinski, Torsten
Marx, Gernot
Gerss, Joachim
Zarbock, Alexander
author_sort Meersch, Melanie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a well-recognised complication of critical illness which is of crucial importance for morbidity, mortality and health resource utilisation. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) inevitably entails an escalation of treatment complexity and increases costs for those patients with severe AKI. However, it is still not clear whether regional citrate anticoagulation or systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous RRT (CRRT) is most appropriate. We hypothesise that, in contrast to systemic heparin anticoagulation, regional citrate anticoagulation for CRRT prolongs filter life span and improves overall survival in a 90-day follow-up period (coprimary endpoints). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a prospective, randomised, multicentre, clinical trial including up to 1450 critically ill patients with AKI requiring CRRT. We suggest to investigate the effect of regional citrate anticoagulation for CRRT as compared with systemic heparin anticoagulation. The two coprimary outcomes are filter life span and overall survival in a 90-day follow-up period. Secondary outcomes are length of stay in the intensive care unit; length of hospitalisation; duration of CRRT; recovery of renal function at days 28, 60, 90 and 1 year; requirement for RRT after days 28, 60, 90 and 1 year; 28 days, 60 days, 90 days and 1-year all-cause mortality; major adverse kidney events at days 28, 60, 90 and 1 year; bleeding complications; transfusion requirements; infection rate and costs of RRT. Additionally, in an add-on study involving several of the participating centres, blood samples from recruited patients will be collected at different time points to analyse whether the anticoagulation strategy has an impact on immune response as evidenced by leucocyte recruitment and function. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The RICH trial has been approved by the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, the leading Ethics Committee of the University of Münster and the corresponding Ethics Committee at each participating site. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02669589.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6347902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63479022019-02-08 Regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (RICH) trial: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial Meersch, Melanie Küllmar, Mira Wempe, Carola Kindgen-Milles, Detlef Kluge, Stefan Slowinski, Torsten Marx, Gernot Gerss, Joachim Zarbock, Alexander BMJ Open Intensive Care INTRODUCTION: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a well-recognised complication of critical illness which is of crucial importance for morbidity, mortality and health resource utilisation. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) inevitably entails an escalation of treatment complexity and increases costs for those patients with severe AKI. However, it is still not clear whether regional citrate anticoagulation or systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous RRT (CRRT) is most appropriate. We hypothesise that, in contrast to systemic heparin anticoagulation, regional citrate anticoagulation for CRRT prolongs filter life span and improves overall survival in a 90-day follow-up period (coprimary endpoints). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a prospective, randomised, multicentre, clinical trial including up to 1450 critically ill patients with AKI requiring CRRT. We suggest to investigate the effect of regional citrate anticoagulation for CRRT as compared with systemic heparin anticoagulation. The two coprimary outcomes are filter life span and overall survival in a 90-day follow-up period. Secondary outcomes are length of stay in the intensive care unit; length of hospitalisation; duration of CRRT; recovery of renal function at days 28, 60, 90 and 1 year; requirement for RRT after days 28, 60, 90 and 1 year; 28 days, 60 days, 90 days and 1-year all-cause mortality; major adverse kidney events at days 28, 60, 90 and 1 year; bleeding complications; transfusion requirements; infection rate and costs of RRT. Additionally, in an add-on study involving several of the participating centres, blood samples from recruited patients will be collected at different time points to analyse whether the anticoagulation strategy has an impact on immune response as evidenced by leucocyte recruitment and function. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The RICH trial has been approved by the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, the leading Ethics Committee of the University of Münster and the corresponding Ethics Committee at each participating site. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02669589. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6347902/ /pubmed/30670518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024411 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Intensive Care
Meersch, Melanie
Küllmar, Mira
Wempe, Carola
Kindgen-Milles, Detlef
Kluge, Stefan
Slowinski, Torsten
Marx, Gernot
Gerss, Joachim
Zarbock, Alexander
Regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (RICH) trial: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
title Regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (RICH) trial: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
title_full Regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (RICH) trial: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (RICH) trial: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (RICH) trial: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
title_short Regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (RICH) trial: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
title_sort regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (rich) trial: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
topic Intensive Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30670518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024411
work_keys_str_mv AT meerschmelanie regionalcitrateversussystemicheparinanticoagulationforcontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyincriticallyillpatientswithacutekidneyinjuryrichtrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kullmarmira regionalcitrateversussystemicheparinanticoagulationforcontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyincriticallyillpatientswithacutekidneyinjuryrichtrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wempecarola regionalcitrateversussystemicheparinanticoagulationforcontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyincriticallyillpatientswithacutekidneyinjuryrichtrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kindgenmillesdetlef regionalcitrateversussystemicheparinanticoagulationforcontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyincriticallyillpatientswithacutekidneyinjuryrichtrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT klugestefan regionalcitrateversussystemicheparinanticoagulationforcontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyincriticallyillpatientswithacutekidneyinjuryrichtrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT slowinskitorsten regionalcitrateversussystemicheparinanticoagulationforcontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyincriticallyillpatientswithacutekidneyinjuryrichtrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT marxgernot regionalcitrateversussystemicheparinanticoagulationforcontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyincriticallyillpatientswithacutekidneyinjuryrichtrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gerssjoachim regionalcitrateversussystemicheparinanticoagulationforcontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyincriticallyillpatientswithacutekidneyinjuryrichtrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zarbockalexander regionalcitrateversussystemicheparinanticoagulationforcontinuousrenalreplacementtherapyincriticallyillpatientswithacutekidneyinjuryrichtrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial