Cargando…
Evaluation of the combined effect of factors influencing bowel preparation and adenoma detection rates in patients undergoing colonoscopy
BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is a commonly used modality for screening and surveillance of colorectal cancer (CRC). Therefore, it is essential to have adequate bowel preparation (prep) for the procedure which depends on type of bowel regimens, diet before colonoscopy and timing of the procedure. AIMS: Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347943/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30740233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2018-000254 |
_version_ | 1783390021967937536 |
---|---|
author | Tariq, Hassan Kamal, Muhammad Umar Sapkota, Binita ElShikh, Fady Pirzada, Usman Ali Pullela, Nanda Azam, Sara Zhang, Aiyi Baiomi, Ahmed Abbas, Hafsa Makker, Jasbir Balar, Bhavna Ihimoyan, Ariyo Daniel, Myrta Dev, Anil |
author_facet | Tariq, Hassan Kamal, Muhammad Umar Sapkota, Binita ElShikh, Fady Pirzada, Usman Ali Pullela, Nanda Azam, Sara Zhang, Aiyi Baiomi, Ahmed Abbas, Hafsa Makker, Jasbir Balar, Bhavna Ihimoyan, Ariyo Daniel, Myrta Dev, Anil |
author_sort | Tariq, Hassan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is a commonly used modality for screening and surveillance of colorectal cancer (CRC). Therefore, it is essential to have adequate bowel preparation (prep) for the procedure which depends on type of bowel regimens, diet before colonoscopy and timing of the procedure. AIMS: The purpose of this study is to analyse the effect of multiple factors on adenoma detection rate (ADR) and prep quality of colonoscopy. This is the also the first study determining outcomes based on various combinations of diet, timing of the procedure and bowel prep regimens. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-centre observational study. Data about diet before procedure, bowel prepprep regimen and timing of the procedure was collected for patients coming for screening colonoscopy. RESULTS: Patients with split prep had higher good prep rates (73.8% vs 56.2%) and higher ADRs (34.2 % vs 29.9%) as compared with non-split prep. The good prep quality (65.8% vs 62.1%) and ADRs (31.9% vs 31.5%) were comparable in patients who received clear liquid diet as compared with low residue diet. The good results of bowel prep were obtained with split prep with either clear liquids or low residue diet irrespective of the timing of procedure. The poor prep was noticed in patients who underwent procedure in afternoon, with a low restrictive diet and non-split bowel regimen. CONCLUSIONS: The current study adds to our knowledge about the combined effect of multiple variables affecting the bowel prep quality and ADR. It is imperative to opt for the best combination required for colonoscopy, as this will influence the effectiveness of colonoscopies regarding timely cancer detection and prevention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6347943 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63479432019-02-08 Evaluation of the combined effect of factors influencing bowel preparation and adenoma detection rates in patients undergoing colonoscopy Tariq, Hassan Kamal, Muhammad Umar Sapkota, Binita ElShikh, Fady Pirzada, Usman Ali Pullela, Nanda Azam, Sara Zhang, Aiyi Baiomi, Ahmed Abbas, Hafsa Makker, Jasbir Balar, Bhavna Ihimoyan, Ariyo Daniel, Myrta Dev, Anil BMJ Open Gastroenterol Colorectal Cancer BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is a commonly used modality for screening and surveillance of colorectal cancer (CRC). Therefore, it is essential to have adequate bowel preparation (prep) for the procedure which depends on type of bowel regimens, diet before colonoscopy and timing of the procedure. AIMS: The purpose of this study is to analyse the effect of multiple factors on adenoma detection rate (ADR) and prep quality of colonoscopy. This is the also the first study determining outcomes based on various combinations of diet, timing of the procedure and bowel prep regimens. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-centre observational study. Data about diet before procedure, bowel prepprep regimen and timing of the procedure was collected for patients coming for screening colonoscopy. RESULTS: Patients with split prep had higher good prep rates (73.8% vs 56.2%) and higher ADRs (34.2 % vs 29.9%) as compared with non-split prep. The good prep quality (65.8% vs 62.1%) and ADRs (31.9% vs 31.5%) were comparable in patients who received clear liquid diet as compared with low residue diet. The good results of bowel prep were obtained with split prep with either clear liquids or low residue diet irrespective of the timing of procedure. The poor prep was noticed in patients who underwent procedure in afternoon, with a low restrictive diet and non-split bowel regimen. CONCLUSIONS: The current study adds to our knowledge about the combined effect of multiple variables affecting the bowel prep quality and ADR. It is imperative to opt for the best combination required for colonoscopy, as this will influence the effectiveness of colonoscopies regarding timely cancer detection and prevention. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6347943/ /pubmed/30740233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2018-000254 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Colorectal Cancer Tariq, Hassan Kamal, Muhammad Umar Sapkota, Binita ElShikh, Fady Pirzada, Usman Ali Pullela, Nanda Azam, Sara Zhang, Aiyi Baiomi, Ahmed Abbas, Hafsa Makker, Jasbir Balar, Bhavna Ihimoyan, Ariyo Daniel, Myrta Dev, Anil Evaluation of the combined effect of factors influencing bowel preparation and adenoma detection rates in patients undergoing colonoscopy |
title | Evaluation of the combined effect of factors influencing bowel preparation and adenoma detection rates in patients undergoing colonoscopy |
title_full | Evaluation of the combined effect of factors influencing bowel preparation and adenoma detection rates in patients undergoing colonoscopy |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the combined effect of factors influencing bowel preparation and adenoma detection rates in patients undergoing colonoscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the combined effect of factors influencing bowel preparation and adenoma detection rates in patients undergoing colonoscopy |
title_short | Evaluation of the combined effect of factors influencing bowel preparation and adenoma detection rates in patients undergoing colonoscopy |
title_sort | evaluation of the combined effect of factors influencing bowel preparation and adenoma detection rates in patients undergoing colonoscopy |
topic | Colorectal Cancer |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347943/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30740233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2018-000254 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tariqhassan evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy AT kamalmuhammadumar evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy AT sapkotabinita evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy AT elshikhfady evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy AT pirzadausmanali evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy AT pullelananda evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy AT azamsara evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy AT zhangaiyi evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy AT baiomiahmed evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy AT abbashafsa evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy AT makkerjasbir evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy AT balarbhavna evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy AT ihimoyanariyo evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy AT danielmyrta evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy AT devanil evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy |