Cargando…

Evaluation of the combined effect of factors influencing bowel preparation and adenoma detection rates in patients undergoing colonoscopy

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is a commonly used modality for screening and surveillance of colorectal cancer (CRC). Therefore, it is essential to have adequate bowel preparation (prep) for the procedure which depends on type of bowel regimens, diet before colonoscopy and timing of the procedure. AIMS: Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tariq, Hassan, Kamal, Muhammad Umar, Sapkota, Binita, ElShikh, Fady, Pirzada, Usman Ali, Pullela, Nanda, Azam, Sara, Zhang, Aiyi, Baiomi, Ahmed, Abbas, Hafsa, Makker, Jasbir, Balar, Bhavna, Ihimoyan, Ariyo, Daniel, Myrta, Dev, Anil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30740233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2018-000254
_version_ 1783390021967937536
author Tariq, Hassan
Kamal, Muhammad Umar
Sapkota, Binita
ElShikh, Fady
Pirzada, Usman Ali
Pullela, Nanda
Azam, Sara
Zhang, Aiyi
Baiomi, Ahmed
Abbas, Hafsa
Makker, Jasbir
Balar, Bhavna
Ihimoyan, Ariyo
Daniel, Myrta
Dev, Anil
author_facet Tariq, Hassan
Kamal, Muhammad Umar
Sapkota, Binita
ElShikh, Fady
Pirzada, Usman Ali
Pullela, Nanda
Azam, Sara
Zhang, Aiyi
Baiomi, Ahmed
Abbas, Hafsa
Makker, Jasbir
Balar, Bhavna
Ihimoyan, Ariyo
Daniel, Myrta
Dev, Anil
author_sort Tariq, Hassan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is a commonly used modality for screening and surveillance of colorectal cancer (CRC). Therefore, it is essential to have adequate bowel preparation (prep) for the procedure which depends on type of bowel regimens, diet before colonoscopy and timing of the procedure. AIMS: The purpose of this study is to analyse the effect of multiple factors on adenoma detection rate (ADR) and prep quality of colonoscopy. This is the also the first study determining outcomes based on various combinations of diet, timing of the procedure and bowel prep regimens. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-centre observational study. Data about diet before procedure, bowel prepprep regimen and timing of the procedure was collected for patients coming for screening colonoscopy. RESULTS: Patients with split prep had higher good prep rates (73.8% vs 56.2%) and higher ADRs (34.2 % vs 29.9%) as compared with non-split prep. The good prep quality (65.8% vs 62.1%) and ADRs (31.9% vs 31.5%) were comparable in patients who received clear liquid diet as compared with low residue diet. The good results of bowel prep were obtained with split prep with either clear liquids or low residue diet irrespective of the timing of procedure. The poor prep was noticed in patients who underwent procedure in afternoon, with a low restrictive diet and non-split bowel regimen. CONCLUSIONS: The current study adds to our knowledge about the combined effect of multiple variables affecting the bowel prep quality and ADR. It is imperative to opt for the best combination required for colonoscopy, as this will influence the effectiveness of colonoscopies regarding timely cancer detection and prevention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6347943
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63479432019-02-08 Evaluation of the combined effect of factors influencing bowel preparation and adenoma detection rates in patients undergoing colonoscopy Tariq, Hassan Kamal, Muhammad Umar Sapkota, Binita ElShikh, Fady Pirzada, Usman Ali Pullela, Nanda Azam, Sara Zhang, Aiyi Baiomi, Ahmed Abbas, Hafsa Makker, Jasbir Balar, Bhavna Ihimoyan, Ariyo Daniel, Myrta Dev, Anil BMJ Open Gastroenterol Colorectal Cancer BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is a commonly used modality for screening and surveillance of colorectal cancer (CRC). Therefore, it is essential to have adequate bowel preparation (prep) for the procedure which depends on type of bowel regimens, diet before colonoscopy and timing of the procedure. AIMS: The purpose of this study is to analyse the effect of multiple factors on adenoma detection rate (ADR) and prep quality of colonoscopy. This is the also the first study determining outcomes based on various combinations of diet, timing of the procedure and bowel prep regimens. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-centre observational study. Data about diet before procedure, bowel prepprep regimen and timing of the procedure was collected for patients coming for screening colonoscopy. RESULTS: Patients with split prep had higher good prep rates (73.8% vs 56.2%) and higher ADRs (34.2 % vs 29.9%) as compared with non-split prep. The good prep quality (65.8% vs 62.1%) and ADRs (31.9% vs 31.5%) were comparable in patients who received clear liquid diet as compared with low residue diet. The good results of bowel prep were obtained with split prep with either clear liquids or low residue diet irrespective of the timing of procedure. The poor prep was noticed in patients who underwent procedure in afternoon, with a low restrictive diet and non-split bowel regimen. CONCLUSIONS: The current study adds to our knowledge about the combined effect of multiple variables affecting the bowel prep quality and ADR. It is imperative to opt for the best combination required for colonoscopy, as this will influence the effectiveness of colonoscopies regarding timely cancer detection and prevention. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6347943/ /pubmed/30740233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2018-000254 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Colorectal Cancer
Tariq, Hassan
Kamal, Muhammad Umar
Sapkota, Binita
ElShikh, Fady
Pirzada, Usman Ali
Pullela, Nanda
Azam, Sara
Zhang, Aiyi
Baiomi, Ahmed
Abbas, Hafsa
Makker, Jasbir
Balar, Bhavna
Ihimoyan, Ariyo
Daniel, Myrta
Dev, Anil
Evaluation of the combined effect of factors influencing bowel preparation and adenoma detection rates in patients undergoing colonoscopy
title Evaluation of the combined effect of factors influencing bowel preparation and adenoma detection rates in patients undergoing colonoscopy
title_full Evaluation of the combined effect of factors influencing bowel preparation and adenoma detection rates in patients undergoing colonoscopy
title_fullStr Evaluation of the combined effect of factors influencing bowel preparation and adenoma detection rates in patients undergoing colonoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the combined effect of factors influencing bowel preparation and adenoma detection rates in patients undergoing colonoscopy
title_short Evaluation of the combined effect of factors influencing bowel preparation and adenoma detection rates in patients undergoing colonoscopy
title_sort evaluation of the combined effect of factors influencing bowel preparation and adenoma detection rates in patients undergoing colonoscopy
topic Colorectal Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30740233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2018-000254
work_keys_str_mv AT tariqhassan evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy
AT kamalmuhammadumar evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy
AT sapkotabinita evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy
AT elshikhfady evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy
AT pirzadausmanali evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy
AT pullelananda evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy
AT azamsara evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy
AT zhangaiyi evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy
AT baiomiahmed evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy
AT abbashafsa evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy
AT makkerjasbir evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy
AT balarbhavna evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy
AT ihimoyanariyo evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy
AT danielmyrta evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy
AT devanil evaluationofthecombinedeffectoffactorsinfluencingbowelpreparationandadenomadetectionratesinpatientsundergoingcolonoscopy