Cargando…

Exploring the utility of internal whistleblowing in healthcare via agent-based models

OBJECTIVE: The benefits of internal whistleblowing or speaking-up in the healthcare sector are significant. The a priori assumption that employee whistleblowing is always beneficial is, however, rarely examined. While recent research has begun to consider how the complex nature of healthcare institu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rauwolf, Paul, Jones, Aled
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30813107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021705
_version_ 1783390023060553728
author Rauwolf, Paul
Jones, Aled
author_facet Rauwolf, Paul
Jones, Aled
author_sort Rauwolf, Paul
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The benefits of internal whistleblowing or speaking-up in the healthcare sector are significant. The a priori assumption that employee whistleblowing is always beneficial is, however, rarely examined. While recent research has begun to consider how the complex nature of healthcare institutions impact speaking-up rates, few have investigated the institutional processes and factors that facilitate or retard the benefits of speaking up. Here we consider how the efficacy of formal inquiries within organisations in response to employees’ speaking up about their concerns affects the utility of internal whistleblowing. DESIGN: Using computational models, we consider how best to improve patient care through internal whistleblowing when resource and practical limitations constrain healthcare operation. We analyse the ramifications of varying organisational responses to employee concerns, given organisational and practical limitations. SETTING: Drawing on evidence from international research, we test the utility of whistleblowing policies in a variety of organisational settings. This includes institutions where whistleblowing inquiries are handled with varying rates of efficiency and accuracy. RESULTS: We find organisational inefficiencies can negatively impact the benefits of speaking up about bad patient care. We find that, given resource limitations and review inefficiencies, it can actually improve patient care if whistleblowing rates are limited. However, we demonstrate that including softer mechanisms for internal adjustment of healthcare practice (eg, peer to peer conversation) alongside whistleblowing policy can overcome these organisational limitations. CONCLUSION: Healthcare organisations internationally have a variable record of responding to employees who speak up about their workplace concerns. Where organisations get this wrong, the consequences can be serious for patient care and staff well-being. The results of this study, therefore, have implications for researchers, policy makers and healthcare organisations internationally. We conclude with a call for further research on a more holistic understanding of the interplay between organisational structure and the benefits of whistleblowing to patient care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6347952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63479522019-02-08 Exploring the utility of internal whistleblowing in healthcare via agent-based models Rauwolf, Paul Jones, Aled BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVE: The benefits of internal whistleblowing or speaking-up in the healthcare sector are significant. The a priori assumption that employee whistleblowing is always beneficial is, however, rarely examined. While recent research has begun to consider how the complex nature of healthcare institutions impact speaking-up rates, few have investigated the institutional processes and factors that facilitate or retard the benefits of speaking up. Here we consider how the efficacy of formal inquiries within organisations in response to employees’ speaking up about their concerns affects the utility of internal whistleblowing. DESIGN: Using computational models, we consider how best to improve patient care through internal whistleblowing when resource and practical limitations constrain healthcare operation. We analyse the ramifications of varying organisational responses to employee concerns, given organisational and practical limitations. SETTING: Drawing on evidence from international research, we test the utility of whistleblowing policies in a variety of organisational settings. This includes institutions where whistleblowing inquiries are handled with varying rates of efficiency and accuracy. RESULTS: We find organisational inefficiencies can negatively impact the benefits of speaking up about bad patient care. We find that, given resource limitations and review inefficiencies, it can actually improve patient care if whistleblowing rates are limited. However, we demonstrate that including softer mechanisms for internal adjustment of healthcare practice (eg, peer to peer conversation) alongside whistleblowing policy can overcome these organisational limitations. CONCLUSION: Healthcare organisations internationally have a variable record of responding to employees who speak up about their workplace concerns. Where organisations get this wrong, the consequences can be serious for patient care and staff well-being. The results of this study, therefore, have implications for researchers, policy makers and healthcare organisations internationally. We conclude with a call for further research on a more holistic understanding of the interplay between organisational structure and the benefits of whistleblowing to patient care. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6347952/ /pubmed/30813107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021705 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Policy
Rauwolf, Paul
Jones, Aled
Exploring the utility of internal whistleblowing in healthcare via agent-based models
title Exploring the utility of internal whistleblowing in healthcare via agent-based models
title_full Exploring the utility of internal whistleblowing in healthcare via agent-based models
title_fullStr Exploring the utility of internal whistleblowing in healthcare via agent-based models
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the utility of internal whistleblowing in healthcare via agent-based models
title_short Exploring the utility of internal whistleblowing in healthcare via agent-based models
title_sort exploring the utility of internal whistleblowing in healthcare via agent-based models
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30813107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021705
work_keys_str_mv AT rauwolfpaul exploringtheutilityofinternalwhistleblowinginhealthcareviaagentbasedmodels
AT jonesaled exploringtheutilityofinternalwhistleblowinginhealthcareviaagentbasedmodels