Cargando…

Pharmacist joint-working with general practices: evaluating the Sheffield Primary Care Pharmacy Programme. A mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND: The NHS in the UK supports pharmacists’ deployment into general practices. This article reports on the implementation and impact of the Primary Care Pharmacy Programme (PCPP). The programme is a care delivery model that was undertaken at scale across a city in which community pharmacists...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marques, Iuri, Gray, Nicola Jane, Tsoneva, Jo, Magirr, Peter, Blenkinsopp, Alison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6348324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30723797
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen18X101611
_version_ 1783390080519372800
author Marques, Iuri
Gray, Nicola Jane
Tsoneva, Jo
Magirr, Peter
Blenkinsopp, Alison
author_facet Marques, Iuri
Gray, Nicola Jane
Tsoneva, Jo
Magirr, Peter
Blenkinsopp, Alison
author_sort Marques, Iuri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The NHS in the UK supports pharmacists’ deployment into general practices. This article reports on the implementation and impact of the Primary Care Pharmacy Programme (PCPP). The programme is a care delivery model that was undertaken at scale across a city in which community pharmacists (CPs) were matched with general practices and performed clinical duties for one half-day per week. AIM: To investigate (a) challenges of integration of CPs in general practices, and (b) the perceived impact on care delivery and community pharmacy practice. DESIGN & SETTING: This mixed-methods study was conducted with CPs, community pharmacy employers (CPEs), scheme commissioners (SCs), and patients in Sheffield. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews (n = 22) took place with CPs (n = 12), CPEs (n = 2), SCs (n = 3), and patients (n = 5). A cross-sectional survey of PCPP pharmacists (n = 47, 66%) was also used. A descriptive analysis of patient feedback forms was undertaken and a database of pharmacist activities was created. RESULTS: Eighty-six of 88 practices deployed a pharmacist. Although community pharmacy contracting and backfill arrangements were sometimes complicated, timely deployment was achieved. Development of closer relationships appeared to facilitate extension of initially agreed roles, including transition from ‘backroom’ to patient-facing clinical work. CPs gained understanding of GP processes and patients’ primary care pathway, allowing them to follow up work at the community pharmacy in a more timely way, positively impacting on patients' and healthcare professionals’ perceived delivery of care. CONCLUSION: The PCPP scheme was the first of its kind to achieve almost universal uptake by GPs throughout a large city. The study findings reveal the potential for CP–GP joint-working in increasing perceived positive care delivery and reducing fragmented care, and can inform future implementation at scale and at practice level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6348324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63483242019-02-05 Pharmacist joint-working with general practices: evaluating the Sheffield Primary Care Pharmacy Programme. A mixed-methods study Marques, Iuri Gray, Nicola Jane Tsoneva, Jo Magirr, Peter Blenkinsopp, Alison BJGP Open Research BACKGROUND: The NHS in the UK supports pharmacists’ deployment into general practices. This article reports on the implementation and impact of the Primary Care Pharmacy Programme (PCPP). The programme is a care delivery model that was undertaken at scale across a city in which community pharmacists (CPs) were matched with general practices and performed clinical duties for one half-day per week. AIM: To investigate (a) challenges of integration of CPs in general practices, and (b) the perceived impact on care delivery and community pharmacy practice. DESIGN & SETTING: This mixed-methods study was conducted with CPs, community pharmacy employers (CPEs), scheme commissioners (SCs), and patients in Sheffield. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews (n = 22) took place with CPs (n = 12), CPEs (n = 2), SCs (n = 3), and patients (n = 5). A cross-sectional survey of PCPP pharmacists (n = 47, 66%) was also used. A descriptive analysis of patient feedback forms was undertaken and a database of pharmacist activities was created. RESULTS: Eighty-six of 88 practices deployed a pharmacist. Although community pharmacy contracting and backfill arrangements were sometimes complicated, timely deployment was achieved. Development of closer relationships appeared to facilitate extension of initially agreed roles, including transition from ‘backroom’ to patient-facing clinical work. CPs gained understanding of GP processes and patients’ primary care pathway, allowing them to follow up work at the community pharmacy in a more timely way, positively impacting on patients' and healthcare professionals’ perceived delivery of care. CONCLUSION: The PCPP scheme was the first of its kind to achieve almost universal uptake by GPs throughout a large city. The study findings reveal the potential for CP–GP joint-working in increasing perceived positive care delivery and reducing fragmented care, and can inform future implementation at scale and at practice level. Royal College of General Practitioners 2018-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6348324/ /pubmed/30723797 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen18X101611 Text en Copyright © The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research
Marques, Iuri
Gray, Nicola Jane
Tsoneva, Jo
Magirr, Peter
Blenkinsopp, Alison
Pharmacist joint-working with general practices: evaluating the Sheffield Primary Care Pharmacy Programme. A mixed-methods study
title Pharmacist joint-working with general practices: evaluating the Sheffield Primary Care Pharmacy Programme. A mixed-methods study
title_full Pharmacist joint-working with general practices: evaluating the Sheffield Primary Care Pharmacy Programme. A mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Pharmacist joint-working with general practices: evaluating the Sheffield Primary Care Pharmacy Programme. A mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacist joint-working with general practices: evaluating the Sheffield Primary Care Pharmacy Programme. A mixed-methods study
title_short Pharmacist joint-working with general practices: evaluating the Sheffield Primary Care Pharmacy Programme. A mixed-methods study
title_sort pharmacist joint-working with general practices: evaluating the sheffield primary care pharmacy programme. a mixed-methods study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6348324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30723797
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen18X101611
work_keys_str_mv AT marquesiuri pharmacistjointworkingwithgeneralpracticesevaluatingthesheffieldprimarycarepharmacyprogrammeamixedmethodsstudy
AT graynicolajane pharmacistjointworkingwithgeneralpracticesevaluatingthesheffieldprimarycarepharmacyprogrammeamixedmethodsstudy
AT tsonevajo pharmacistjointworkingwithgeneralpracticesevaluatingthesheffieldprimarycarepharmacyprogrammeamixedmethodsstudy
AT magirrpeter pharmacistjointworkingwithgeneralpracticesevaluatingthesheffieldprimarycarepharmacyprogrammeamixedmethodsstudy
AT blenkinsoppalison pharmacistjointworkingwithgeneralpracticesevaluatingthesheffieldprimarycarepharmacyprogrammeamixedmethodsstudy