Cargando…

Fit for Cancer Treatment: a prospective feasibility study of primary care initiated prehabilitation for patients with suspected cancer

BACKGROUND: Risk profile assessment and corrective interventions using optimisation of health status and prehabilitation represent an important strategy in the management of patients with a suspected cancer diagnosis. AIM: To determine the feasibility of pre-treatment optimisation and prehabilitatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barlow, Rachael C, Chan, David Sheng Yi, Mayor, Sharon, Perkins, Ceri, Lawton, Helen L, Powell, Arfon GMT, Lewis, Wyn G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6348330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30723794
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen18X101608
_version_ 1783390081893007360
author Barlow, Rachael C
Chan, David Sheng Yi
Mayor, Sharon
Perkins, Ceri
Lawton, Helen L
Powell, Arfon GMT
Lewis, Wyn G
author_facet Barlow, Rachael C
Chan, David Sheng Yi
Mayor, Sharon
Perkins, Ceri
Lawton, Helen L
Powell, Arfon GMT
Lewis, Wyn G
author_sort Barlow, Rachael C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Risk profile assessment and corrective interventions using optimisation of health status and prehabilitation represent an important strategy in the management of patients with a suspected cancer diagnosis. AIM: To determine the feasibility of pre-treatment optimisation and prehabilitation commenced at index primary care consultation, to improve patients’ preparation for treatment by maximising the time available. DESIGN & SETTING: Between January 2015 and May 2016, 195 patients presenting to 12 GP practices were deemed eligible to enter the study, of which 189 (96.9%, median age 60 [21–91] years and 65 months; 124 female) were recruited and consented to the prehabilitation bundle. METHOD: All patients were simultaneously referred to secondary care using urgent suspected cancer (USC) pathways. The primary outcome measures were definitive diagnosis and treatment plan. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (7.9%) were diagnosed with cancer (three breast, three colon, two lung, two skin [one melanoma, one sarcoma], one tonsil, one vocal cord, one pancreas, one prostate, one ependymoma) and 62 were diagnosed with other significant medical conditions (47 gastrointestinal, 13 sepsis, two respiratory) requiring secondary care assessment and treatment. Of the 15 patients with cancer, 11 (73.3%) underwent potentially curative treatment, and four (26.7%) palliative treatment. Of the total study cohort, 84 (44%) required a form of optimisation in primary care, and patients with cancer were more likely to require optimisation than others (n = 10 [63%] versus n = 74 [43%], χ(2) 9.384, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: One in 12 primary care USC patients had cancer (5.6% receiving potentially curative treatment), one in three had other systemic health issues, and overall two in five benefited from healthcare intervention. Primary care optimisation was feasible and associated with important allied health benefits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6348330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63483302019-02-05 Fit for Cancer Treatment: a prospective feasibility study of primary care initiated prehabilitation for patients with suspected cancer Barlow, Rachael C Chan, David Sheng Yi Mayor, Sharon Perkins, Ceri Lawton, Helen L Powell, Arfon GMT Lewis, Wyn G BJGP Open Research BACKGROUND: Risk profile assessment and corrective interventions using optimisation of health status and prehabilitation represent an important strategy in the management of patients with a suspected cancer diagnosis. AIM: To determine the feasibility of pre-treatment optimisation and prehabilitation commenced at index primary care consultation, to improve patients’ preparation for treatment by maximising the time available. DESIGN & SETTING: Between January 2015 and May 2016, 195 patients presenting to 12 GP practices were deemed eligible to enter the study, of which 189 (96.9%, median age 60 [21–91] years and 65 months; 124 female) were recruited and consented to the prehabilitation bundle. METHOD: All patients were simultaneously referred to secondary care using urgent suspected cancer (USC) pathways. The primary outcome measures were definitive diagnosis and treatment plan. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (7.9%) were diagnosed with cancer (three breast, three colon, two lung, two skin [one melanoma, one sarcoma], one tonsil, one vocal cord, one pancreas, one prostate, one ependymoma) and 62 were diagnosed with other significant medical conditions (47 gastrointestinal, 13 sepsis, two respiratory) requiring secondary care assessment and treatment. Of the 15 patients with cancer, 11 (73.3%) underwent potentially curative treatment, and four (26.7%) palliative treatment. Of the total study cohort, 84 (44%) required a form of optimisation in primary care, and patients with cancer were more likely to require optimisation than others (n = 10 [63%] versus n = 74 [43%], χ(2) 9.384, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: One in 12 primary care USC patients had cancer (5.6% receiving potentially curative treatment), one in three had other systemic health issues, and overall two in five benefited from healthcare intervention. Primary care optimisation was feasible and associated with important allied health benefits. Royal College of General Practitioners 2018-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6348330/ /pubmed/30723794 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen18X101608 Text en Copyright © The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research
Barlow, Rachael C
Chan, David Sheng Yi
Mayor, Sharon
Perkins, Ceri
Lawton, Helen L
Powell, Arfon GMT
Lewis, Wyn G
Fit for Cancer Treatment: a prospective feasibility study of primary care initiated prehabilitation for patients with suspected cancer
title Fit for Cancer Treatment: a prospective feasibility study of primary care initiated prehabilitation for patients with suspected cancer
title_full Fit for Cancer Treatment: a prospective feasibility study of primary care initiated prehabilitation for patients with suspected cancer
title_fullStr Fit for Cancer Treatment: a prospective feasibility study of primary care initiated prehabilitation for patients with suspected cancer
title_full_unstemmed Fit for Cancer Treatment: a prospective feasibility study of primary care initiated prehabilitation for patients with suspected cancer
title_short Fit for Cancer Treatment: a prospective feasibility study of primary care initiated prehabilitation for patients with suspected cancer
title_sort fit for cancer treatment: a prospective feasibility study of primary care initiated prehabilitation for patients with suspected cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6348330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30723794
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen18X101608
work_keys_str_mv AT barlowrachaelc fitforcancertreatmentaprospectivefeasibilitystudyofprimarycareinitiatedprehabilitationforpatientswithsuspectedcancer
AT chandavidshengyi fitforcancertreatmentaprospectivefeasibilitystudyofprimarycareinitiatedprehabilitationforpatientswithsuspectedcancer
AT mayorsharon fitforcancertreatmentaprospectivefeasibilitystudyofprimarycareinitiatedprehabilitationforpatientswithsuspectedcancer
AT perkinsceri fitforcancertreatmentaprospectivefeasibilitystudyofprimarycareinitiatedprehabilitationforpatientswithsuspectedcancer
AT lawtonhelenl fitforcancertreatmentaprospectivefeasibilitystudyofprimarycareinitiatedprehabilitationforpatientswithsuspectedcancer
AT powellarfongmt fitforcancertreatmentaprospectivefeasibilitystudyofprimarycareinitiatedprehabilitationforpatientswithsuspectedcancer
AT lewiswyng fitforcancertreatmentaprospectivefeasibilitystudyofprimarycareinitiatedprehabilitationforpatientswithsuspectedcancer