Cargando…
Acute migraine therapy with external trigeminal neurostimulation (ACME): A randomized controlled trial
OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of external trigeminal nerve stimulation for acute pain relief during migraine attacks with or without aura via a sham-controlled trial. METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study conducted across three headache centers in the Uni...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6348457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30449151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0333102418811573 |
_version_ | 1783390106088898560 |
---|---|
author | Chou, Denise E Shnayderman Yugrakh, Marianna Winegarner, Dana Rowe, Vernon Kuruvilla, Deena Schoenen, Jean |
author_facet | Chou, Denise E Shnayderman Yugrakh, Marianna Winegarner, Dana Rowe, Vernon Kuruvilla, Deena Schoenen, Jean |
author_sort | Chou, Denise E |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of external trigeminal nerve stimulation for acute pain relief during migraine attacks with or without aura via a sham-controlled trial. METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study conducted across three headache centers in the United States. Adult patients who were experiencing an acute migraine attack with or without aura were recruited on site and randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either verum or sham external trigeminal nerve stimulation treatment (CEFALY Technology) for 1 hour. Pain intensity was scored using a visual analogue scale (0 = no pain to 10 = maximum pain). The primary outcome measure was the mean change in pain intensity at 1 hour compared to baseline. RESULTS: A total of 109 participants were screened between February 1, 2016 and March 31, 2017. Of these, 106 patients were randomized and included in the intention-to-treat analysis (verum: n = 52; sham: n = 54). The primary outcome measure was significantly more reduced in the verum group than in the sham group: −3.46 ± 2.32 versus −1.78 ± 1.89 (p < 0.0001), or −59% versus −30% (p < 0.0001). With regards to migraine subgroups, there was a significant difference in pain reduction between verum and sham for ‘migraine without aura’ attacks: mean visual analogue scale reduction at 1 hour was −3.3 ± 2.4 for the verum group versus −1.7 ± 1.9 for the sham group (p = 0.0006). For ‘migraine with aura’ attacks, pain reduction was numerically greater for verum versus sham, but did not reach significance: mean visual analogue scale reduction at 1 hour was −4.3 ± 1.8 for the verum group versus −2.6 ± 1.9 for the sham group (p = 0.060). No serious adverse events were reported and five minor adverse events occurred in the verum group. CONCLUSION: One-hour treatment with external trigeminal nerve stimulation resulted in significant headache pain relief compared to sham stimulation and was well tolerated, suggesting it may be a safe and effective acute treatment for migraine attacks. STUDY PROTOCOL: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02590939. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6348457 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63484572019-02-15 Acute migraine therapy with external trigeminal neurostimulation (ACME): A randomized controlled trial Chou, Denise E Shnayderman Yugrakh, Marianna Winegarner, Dana Rowe, Vernon Kuruvilla, Deena Schoenen, Jean Cephalalgia Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of external trigeminal nerve stimulation for acute pain relief during migraine attacks with or without aura via a sham-controlled trial. METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study conducted across three headache centers in the United States. Adult patients who were experiencing an acute migraine attack with or without aura were recruited on site and randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either verum or sham external trigeminal nerve stimulation treatment (CEFALY Technology) for 1 hour. Pain intensity was scored using a visual analogue scale (0 = no pain to 10 = maximum pain). The primary outcome measure was the mean change in pain intensity at 1 hour compared to baseline. RESULTS: A total of 109 participants were screened between February 1, 2016 and March 31, 2017. Of these, 106 patients were randomized and included in the intention-to-treat analysis (verum: n = 52; sham: n = 54). The primary outcome measure was significantly more reduced in the verum group than in the sham group: −3.46 ± 2.32 versus −1.78 ± 1.89 (p < 0.0001), or −59% versus −30% (p < 0.0001). With regards to migraine subgroups, there was a significant difference in pain reduction between verum and sham for ‘migraine without aura’ attacks: mean visual analogue scale reduction at 1 hour was −3.3 ± 2.4 for the verum group versus −1.7 ± 1.9 for the sham group (p = 0.0006). For ‘migraine with aura’ attacks, pain reduction was numerically greater for verum versus sham, but did not reach significance: mean visual analogue scale reduction at 1 hour was −4.3 ± 1.8 for the verum group versus −2.6 ± 1.9 for the sham group (p = 0.060). No serious adverse events were reported and five minor adverse events occurred in the verum group. CONCLUSION: One-hour treatment with external trigeminal nerve stimulation resulted in significant headache pain relief compared to sham stimulation and was well tolerated, suggesting it may be a safe and effective acute treatment for migraine attacks. STUDY PROTOCOL: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02590939. SAGE Publications 2018-11-17 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6348457/ /pubmed/30449151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0333102418811573 Text en © International Headache Society 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Chou, Denise E Shnayderman Yugrakh, Marianna Winegarner, Dana Rowe, Vernon Kuruvilla, Deena Schoenen, Jean Acute migraine therapy with external trigeminal neurostimulation (ACME): A randomized controlled trial |
title | Acute migraine therapy with external trigeminal neurostimulation (ACME): A randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Acute migraine therapy with external trigeminal neurostimulation (ACME): A randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Acute migraine therapy with external trigeminal neurostimulation (ACME): A randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Acute migraine therapy with external trigeminal neurostimulation (ACME): A randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Acute migraine therapy with external trigeminal neurostimulation (ACME): A randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | acute migraine therapy with external trigeminal neurostimulation (acme): a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6348457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30449151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0333102418811573 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choudenisee acutemigrainetherapywithexternaltrigeminalneurostimulationacmearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT shnaydermanyugrakhmarianna acutemigrainetherapywithexternaltrigeminalneurostimulationacmearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT winegarnerdana acutemigrainetherapywithexternaltrigeminalneurostimulationacmearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rowevernon acutemigrainetherapywithexternaltrigeminalneurostimulationacmearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kuruvilladeena acutemigrainetherapywithexternaltrigeminalneurostimulationacmearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schoenenjean acutemigrainetherapywithexternaltrigeminalneurostimulationacmearandomizedcontrolledtrial |