Cargando…
A real-world comparative analysis of carfilzomib and other systemic multiple myeloma chemotherapies in a US community oncology setting
BACKGROUND: Most multiple myeloma (MM) patients ultimately progress, with remission duration decreasing after first relapse. Recently, novel agents have been approved for the treatment of relapsed MM. There is a paucity of real-world data on these treatments. We sought to compare time to next treatm...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6348507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30719266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040620718816699 |
_version_ | 1783390111877038080 |
---|---|
author | Rifkin, Robert M. Medhekar, Rohan Amirian, E. Susan Aguilar, Kathleen M. Wilson, Thomas Boyd, Marley Mezzi, Khalid Panjabi, Sumeet |
author_facet | Rifkin, Robert M. Medhekar, Rohan Amirian, E. Susan Aguilar, Kathleen M. Wilson, Thomas Boyd, Marley Mezzi, Khalid Panjabi, Sumeet |
author_sort | Rifkin, Robert M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Most multiple myeloma (MM) patients ultimately progress, with remission duration decreasing after first relapse. Recently, novel agents have been approved for the treatment of relapsed MM. There is a paucity of real-world data on these treatments. We sought to compare time to next treatment (TTNT) in MM patients in their second line of therapy (LOT2), treated with common proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based triplets. METHODS: Adult MM patients who received carfilzomib (K) between 1 November 2013 and 29 February 2016 at US Oncology Network (USON) clinics utilizing iKnowMed™ electronic health records (EHRs) were identified. Patients were included if they were ⩾18 years of age, not enrolled in clinical trials, had ⩾2 visits at a USON clinic and received LOT2 regimens consisting of: K+lenalidomide with steroid (KRd), bortezomib+lenalidomide with steroid (VRd), or bortezomib+cyclophosphamide with steroid (VCyd). TTNT was estimated from LOT2 initiation to LOT3 initiation using the Kaplan–Meier method, and hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox modeling. RESULTS: A total of 718 patients received a K-containing regimen sometime during their MM treatment (LOT1 to LOT5). Of these, 156 patients received: KRd (n = 112; 71.8%), VRd (n =27; 17.3%), or VCyd (n = 17; 10.9%). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (mean age: 64.8 years; 58% male). Median TTNT was longest for KRd [25.3 months; 95% confidence interval (CI): 19.71–NR], versus VRd or VCyd (VRd median TTNT: 10.2 months, 95% CI: 4.24–12.71; VCyd: 6.5 months, 95% CI: 3.02–12.78; log-rank p < 0.0001). The adjusted HR for KRd was 0.19 (95% CI: 0.11–0.37), compared with VRd. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the real-world nature of these data, the median TTNT observed with KRd was relatively consistent, with progression-free survival (PFS) for KRd observed in the phase III ASPIRE trial (median PFS: ITT population = 26.3 months; LOT2 = 29.6 months). Patients who received KRd at first relapse had significantly longer TTNT, compared with those on VRd or VCyd, confirming the value of KRd as an important treatment option for relapsed MM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6348507 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63485072019-02-04 A real-world comparative analysis of carfilzomib and other systemic multiple myeloma chemotherapies in a US community oncology setting Rifkin, Robert M. Medhekar, Rohan Amirian, E. Susan Aguilar, Kathleen M. Wilson, Thomas Boyd, Marley Mezzi, Khalid Panjabi, Sumeet Ther Adv Hematol Original Research BACKGROUND: Most multiple myeloma (MM) patients ultimately progress, with remission duration decreasing after first relapse. Recently, novel agents have been approved for the treatment of relapsed MM. There is a paucity of real-world data on these treatments. We sought to compare time to next treatment (TTNT) in MM patients in their second line of therapy (LOT2), treated with common proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based triplets. METHODS: Adult MM patients who received carfilzomib (K) between 1 November 2013 and 29 February 2016 at US Oncology Network (USON) clinics utilizing iKnowMed™ electronic health records (EHRs) were identified. Patients were included if they were ⩾18 years of age, not enrolled in clinical trials, had ⩾2 visits at a USON clinic and received LOT2 regimens consisting of: K+lenalidomide with steroid (KRd), bortezomib+lenalidomide with steroid (VRd), or bortezomib+cyclophosphamide with steroid (VCyd). TTNT was estimated from LOT2 initiation to LOT3 initiation using the Kaplan–Meier method, and hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox modeling. RESULTS: A total of 718 patients received a K-containing regimen sometime during their MM treatment (LOT1 to LOT5). Of these, 156 patients received: KRd (n = 112; 71.8%), VRd (n =27; 17.3%), or VCyd (n = 17; 10.9%). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (mean age: 64.8 years; 58% male). Median TTNT was longest for KRd [25.3 months; 95% confidence interval (CI): 19.71–NR], versus VRd or VCyd (VRd median TTNT: 10.2 months, 95% CI: 4.24–12.71; VCyd: 6.5 months, 95% CI: 3.02–12.78; log-rank p < 0.0001). The adjusted HR for KRd was 0.19 (95% CI: 0.11–0.37), compared with VRd. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the real-world nature of these data, the median TTNT observed with KRd was relatively consistent, with progression-free survival (PFS) for KRd observed in the phase III ASPIRE trial (median PFS: ITT population = 26.3 months; LOT2 = 29.6 months). Patients who received KRd at first relapse had significantly longer TTNT, compared with those on VRd or VCyd, confirming the value of KRd as an important treatment option for relapsed MM. SAGE Publications 2019-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6348507/ /pubmed/30719266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040620718816699 Text en © The Author(s), 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Rifkin, Robert M. Medhekar, Rohan Amirian, E. Susan Aguilar, Kathleen M. Wilson, Thomas Boyd, Marley Mezzi, Khalid Panjabi, Sumeet A real-world comparative analysis of carfilzomib and other systemic multiple myeloma chemotherapies in a US community oncology setting |
title | A real-world comparative analysis of carfilzomib and other systemic multiple myeloma chemotherapies in a US community oncology setting |
title_full | A real-world comparative analysis of carfilzomib and other systemic multiple myeloma chemotherapies in a US community oncology setting |
title_fullStr | A real-world comparative analysis of carfilzomib and other systemic multiple myeloma chemotherapies in a US community oncology setting |
title_full_unstemmed | A real-world comparative analysis of carfilzomib and other systemic multiple myeloma chemotherapies in a US community oncology setting |
title_short | A real-world comparative analysis of carfilzomib and other systemic multiple myeloma chemotherapies in a US community oncology setting |
title_sort | real-world comparative analysis of carfilzomib and other systemic multiple myeloma chemotherapies in a us community oncology setting |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6348507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30719266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040620718816699 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rifkinrobertm arealworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting AT medhekarrohan arealworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting AT amirianesusan arealworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting AT aguilarkathleenm arealworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting AT wilsonthomas arealworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting AT boydmarley arealworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting AT mezzikhalid arealworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting AT panjabisumeet arealworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting AT rifkinrobertm realworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting AT medhekarrohan realworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting AT amirianesusan realworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting AT aguilarkathleenm realworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting AT wilsonthomas realworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting AT boydmarley realworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting AT mezzikhalid realworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting AT panjabisumeet realworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting |