Cargando…

A real-world comparative analysis of carfilzomib and other systemic multiple myeloma chemotherapies in a US community oncology setting

BACKGROUND: Most multiple myeloma (MM) patients ultimately progress, with remission duration decreasing after first relapse. Recently, novel agents have been approved for the treatment of relapsed MM. There is a paucity of real-world data on these treatments. We sought to compare time to next treatm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rifkin, Robert M., Medhekar, Rohan, Amirian, E. Susan, Aguilar, Kathleen M., Wilson, Thomas, Boyd, Marley, Mezzi, Khalid, Panjabi, Sumeet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6348507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30719266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040620718816699
_version_ 1783390111877038080
author Rifkin, Robert M.
Medhekar, Rohan
Amirian, E. Susan
Aguilar, Kathleen M.
Wilson, Thomas
Boyd, Marley
Mezzi, Khalid
Panjabi, Sumeet
author_facet Rifkin, Robert M.
Medhekar, Rohan
Amirian, E. Susan
Aguilar, Kathleen M.
Wilson, Thomas
Boyd, Marley
Mezzi, Khalid
Panjabi, Sumeet
author_sort Rifkin, Robert M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most multiple myeloma (MM) patients ultimately progress, with remission duration decreasing after first relapse. Recently, novel agents have been approved for the treatment of relapsed MM. There is a paucity of real-world data on these treatments. We sought to compare time to next treatment (TTNT) in MM patients in their second line of therapy (LOT2), treated with common proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based triplets. METHODS: Adult MM patients who received carfilzomib (K) between 1 November 2013 and 29 February 2016 at US Oncology Network (USON) clinics utilizing iKnowMed™ electronic health records (EHRs) were identified. Patients were included if they were ⩾18 years of age, not enrolled in clinical trials, had ⩾2 visits at a USON clinic and received LOT2 regimens consisting of: K+lenalidomide with steroid (KRd), bortezomib+lenalidomide with steroid (VRd), or bortezomib+cyclophosphamide with steroid (VCyd). TTNT was estimated from LOT2 initiation to LOT3 initiation using the Kaplan–Meier method, and hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox modeling. RESULTS: A total of 718 patients received a K-containing regimen sometime during their MM treatment (LOT1 to LOT5). Of these, 156 patients received: KRd (n = 112; 71.8%), VRd (n =27; 17.3%), or VCyd (n = 17; 10.9%). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (mean age: 64.8 years; 58% male). Median TTNT was longest for KRd [25.3 months; 95% confidence interval (CI): 19.71–NR], versus VRd or VCyd (VRd median TTNT: 10.2 months, 95% CI: 4.24–12.71; VCyd: 6.5 months, 95% CI: 3.02–12.78; log-rank p < 0.0001). The adjusted HR for KRd was 0.19 (95% CI: 0.11–0.37), compared with VRd. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the real-world nature of these data, the median TTNT observed with KRd was relatively consistent, with progression-free survival (PFS) for KRd observed in the phase III ASPIRE trial (median PFS: ITT population = 26.3 months; LOT2 = 29.6 months). Patients who received KRd at first relapse had significantly longer TTNT, compared with those on VRd or VCyd, confirming the value of KRd as an important treatment option for relapsed MM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6348507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63485072019-02-04 A real-world comparative analysis of carfilzomib and other systemic multiple myeloma chemotherapies in a US community oncology setting Rifkin, Robert M. Medhekar, Rohan Amirian, E. Susan Aguilar, Kathleen M. Wilson, Thomas Boyd, Marley Mezzi, Khalid Panjabi, Sumeet Ther Adv Hematol Original Research BACKGROUND: Most multiple myeloma (MM) patients ultimately progress, with remission duration decreasing after first relapse. Recently, novel agents have been approved for the treatment of relapsed MM. There is a paucity of real-world data on these treatments. We sought to compare time to next treatment (TTNT) in MM patients in their second line of therapy (LOT2), treated with common proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based triplets. METHODS: Adult MM patients who received carfilzomib (K) between 1 November 2013 and 29 February 2016 at US Oncology Network (USON) clinics utilizing iKnowMed™ electronic health records (EHRs) were identified. Patients were included if they were ⩾18 years of age, not enrolled in clinical trials, had ⩾2 visits at a USON clinic and received LOT2 regimens consisting of: K+lenalidomide with steroid (KRd), bortezomib+lenalidomide with steroid (VRd), or bortezomib+cyclophosphamide with steroid (VCyd). TTNT was estimated from LOT2 initiation to LOT3 initiation using the Kaplan–Meier method, and hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox modeling. RESULTS: A total of 718 patients received a K-containing regimen sometime during their MM treatment (LOT1 to LOT5). Of these, 156 patients received: KRd (n = 112; 71.8%), VRd (n =27; 17.3%), or VCyd (n = 17; 10.9%). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (mean age: 64.8 years; 58% male). Median TTNT was longest for KRd [25.3 months; 95% confidence interval (CI): 19.71–NR], versus VRd or VCyd (VRd median TTNT: 10.2 months, 95% CI: 4.24–12.71; VCyd: 6.5 months, 95% CI: 3.02–12.78; log-rank p < 0.0001). The adjusted HR for KRd was 0.19 (95% CI: 0.11–0.37), compared with VRd. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the real-world nature of these data, the median TTNT observed with KRd was relatively consistent, with progression-free survival (PFS) for KRd observed in the phase III ASPIRE trial (median PFS: ITT population = 26.3 months; LOT2 = 29.6 months). Patients who received KRd at first relapse had significantly longer TTNT, compared with those on VRd or VCyd, confirming the value of KRd as an important treatment option for relapsed MM. SAGE Publications 2019-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6348507/ /pubmed/30719266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040620718816699 Text en © The Author(s), 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Rifkin, Robert M.
Medhekar, Rohan
Amirian, E. Susan
Aguilar, Kathleen M.
Wilson, Thomas
Boyd, Marley
Mezzi, Khalid
Panjabi, Sumeet
A real-world comparative analysis of carfilzomib and other systemic multiple myeloma chemotherapies in a US community oncology setting
title A real-world comparative analysis of carfilzomib and other systemic multiple myeloma chemotherapies in a US community oncology setting
title_full A real-world comparative analysis of carfilzomib and other systemic multiple myeloma chemotherapies in a US community oncology setting
title_fullStr A real-world comparative analysis of carfilzomib and other systemic multiple myeloma chemotherapies in a US community oncology setting
title_full_unstemmed A real-world comparative analysis of carfilzomib and other systemic multiple myeloma chemotherapies in a US community oncology setting
title_short A real-world comparative analysis of carfilzomib and other systemic multiple myeloma chemotherapies in a US community oncology setting
title_sort real-world comparative analysis of carfilzomib and other systemic multiple myeloma chemotherapies in a us community oncology setting
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6348507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30719266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040620718816699
work_keys_str_mv AT rifkinrobertm arealworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT medhekarrohan arealworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT amirianesusan arealworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT aguilarkathleenm arealworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT wilsonthomas arealworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT boydmarley arealworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT mezzikhalid arealworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT panjabisumeet arealworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT rifkinrobertm realworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT medhekarrohan realworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT amirianesusan realworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT aguilarkathleenm realworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT wilsonthomas realworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT boydmarley realworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT mezzikhalid realworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT panjabisumeet realworldcomparativeanalysisofcarfilzomibandothersystemicmultiplemyelomachemotherapiesinauscommunityoncologysetting