Cargando…

The impact of the Glasgow Prognostic Score on survival in second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients with BRAF V600E mutation

BACKGROUND: BRAF (v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1) V600E mutant colorectal cancer is associated with short survival. Recently, clinical trials have been conducted to improve outcomes of second or later lines of chemotherapy. However, there is a paucity of reference data pertaining to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mitani, Seiichiro, Taniguchi, Hiroya, Sugiyama, Keiji, Masuishi, Toshiki, Honda, Kazunori, Narita, Yukiya, Kadowaki, Shigenori, Ura, Takashi, Ando, Masashi, Tajika, Masahiro, Yatabe, Yasushi, Muro, Kei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6348546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30719102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835918820298
_version_ 1783390120169177088
author Mitani, Seiichiro
Taniguchi, Hiroya
Sugiyama, Keiji
Masuishi, Toshiki
Honda, Kazunori
Narita, Yukiya
Kadowaki, Shigenori
Ura, Takashi
Ando, Masashi
Tajika, Masahiro
Yatabe, Yasushi
Muro, Kei
author_facet Mitani, Seiichiro
Taniguchi, Hiroya
Sugiyama, Keiji
Masuishi, Toshiki
Honda, Kazunori
Narita, Yukiya
Kadowaki, Shigenori
Ura, Takashi
Ando, Masashi
Tajika, Masahiro
Yatabe, Yasushi
Muro, Kei
author_sort Mitani, Seiichiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: BRAF (v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1) V600E mutant colorectal cancer is associated with short survival. Recently, clinical trials have been conducted to improve outcomes of second or later lines of chemotherapy. However, there is a paucity of reference data pertaining to outcomes of second-line chemotherapy and prognostic factors that are relevant only to BRAF mutant patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed metastatic colorectal cancer patients with BRAF V600E mutation who underwent second-line chemotherapy between January 2007 and March 2017. We evaluated treatment outcomes and performed prognostic analyses. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients were included. The median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 2.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.91–4.11] and 6.5 (95% CI = 4.30–9.63) months, respectively. Overall response and disease control rates were 7% and 48%, respectively. All the regimens which elicited a partial response included BRAF inhibitors in combination with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies. Therefore, the overall response was 0% after exclusion of patients treated with study drugs. Multivariate analysis for OS revealed that the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and poor performance status were independent prognostic factors. In particular, survival curves according to the GPS stratified the patients into distinct risk groups. The median OSs in patients with GPS of 0, 1, and 2 were 9.9, 5.0, and 1.9 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients with BRAF V600E mutation were extremely poor. GPS may be useful in future clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6348546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63485462019-02-04 The impact of the Glasgow Prognostic Score on survival in second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients with BRAF V600E mutation Mitani, Seiichiro Taniguchi, Hiroya Sugiyama, Keiji Masuishi, Toshiki Honda, Kazunori Narita, Yukiya Kadowaki, Shigenori Ura, Takashi Ando, Masashi Tajika, Masahiro Yatabe, Yasushi Muro, Kei Ther Adv Med Oncol Original Research BACKGROUND: BRAF (v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1) V600E mutant colorectal cancer is associated with short survival. Recently, clinical trials have been conducted to improve outcomes of second or later lines of chemotherapy. However, there is a paucity of reference data pertaining to outcomes of second-line chemotherapy and prognostic factors that are relevant only to BRAF mutant patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed metastatic colorectal cancer patients with BRAF V600E mutation who underwent second-line chemotherapy between January 2007 and March 2017. We evaluated treatment outcomes and performed prognostic analyses. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients were included. The median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 2.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.91–4.11] and 6.5 (95% CI = 4.30–9.63) months, respectively. Overall response and disease control rates were 7% and 48%, respectively. All the regimens which elicited a partial response included BRAF inhibitors in combination with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies. Therefore, the overall response was 0% after exclusion of patients treated with study drugs. Multivariate analysis for OS revealed that the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and poor performance status were independent prognostic factors. In particular, survival curves according to the GPS stratified the patients into distinct risk groups. The median OSs in patients with GPS of 0, 1, and 2 were 9.9, 5.0, and 1.9 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients with BRAF V600E mutation were extremely poor. GPS may be useful in future clinical trials. SAGE Publications 2019-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6348546/ /pubmed/30719102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835918820298 Text en © The Author(s), 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Mitani, Seiichiro
Taniguchi, Hiroya
Sugiyama, Keiji
Masuishi, Toshiki
Honda, Kazunori
Narita, Yukiya
Kadowaki, Shigenori
Ura, Takashi
Ando, Masashi
Tajika, Masahiro
Yatabe, Yasushi
Muro, Kei
The impact of the Glasgow Prognostic Score on survival in second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients with BRAF V600E mutation
title The impact of the Glasgow Prognostic Score on survival in second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients with BRAF V600E mutation
title_full The impact of the Glasgow Prognostic Score on survival in second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients with BRAF V600E mutation
title_fullStr The impact of the Glasgow Prognostic Score on survival in second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients with BRAF V600E mutation
title_full_unstemmed The impact of the Glasgow Prognostic Score on survival in second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients with BRAF V600E mutation
title_short The impact of the Glasgow Prognostic Score on survival in second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients with BRAF V600E mutation
title_sort impact of the glasgow prognostic score on survival in second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients with braf v600e mutation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6348546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30719102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835918820298
work_keys_str_mv AT mitaniseiichiro theimpactoftheglasgowprognosticscoreonsurvivalinsecondlinechemotherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientswithbrafv600emutation
AT taniguchihiroya theimpactoftheglasgowprognosticscoreonsurvivalinsecondlinechemotherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientswithbrafv600emutation
AT sugiyamakeiji theimpactoftheglasgowprognosticscoreonsurvivalinsecondlinechemotherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientswithbrafv600emutation
AT masuishitoshiki theimpactoftheglasgowprognosticscoreonsurvivalinsecondlinechemotherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientswithbrafv600emutation
AT hondakazunori theimpactoftheglasgowprognosticscoreonsurvivalinsecondlinechemotherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientswithbrafv600emutation
AT naritayukiya theimpactoftheglasgowprognosticscoreonsurvivalinsecondlinechemotherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientswithbrafv600emutation
AT kadowakishigenori theimpactoftheglasgowprognosticscoreonsurvivalinsecondlinechemotherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientswithbrafv600emutation
AT uratakashi theimpactoftheglasgowprognosticscoreonsurvivalinsecondlinechemotherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientswithbrafv600emutation
AT andomasashi theimpactoftheglasgowprognosticscoreonsurvivalinsecondlinechemotherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientswithbrafv600emutation
AT tajikamasahiro theimpactoftheglasgowprognosticscoreonsurvivalinsecondlinechemotherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientswithbrafv600emutation
AT yatabeyasushi theimpactoftheglasgowprognosticscoreonsurvivalinsecondlinechemotherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientswithbrafv600emutation
AT murokei theimpactoftheglasgowprognosticscoreonsurvivalinsecondlinechemotherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientswithbrafv600emutation
AT mitaniseiichiro impactoftheglasgowprognosticscoreonsurvivalinsecondlinechemotherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientswithbrafv600emutation
AT taniguchihiroya impactoftheglasgowprognosticscoreonsurvivalinsecondlinechemotherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientswithbrafv600emutation
AT sugiyamakeiji impactoftheglasgowprognosticscoreonsurvivalinsecondlinechemotherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientswithbrafv600emutation
AT masuishitoshiki impactoftheglasgowprognosticscoreonsurvivalinsecondlinechemotherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientswithbrafv600emutation
AT hondakazunori impactoftheglasgowprognosticscoreonsurvivalinsecondlinechemotherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientswithbrafv600emutation
AT naritayukiya impactoftheglasgowprognosticscoreonsurvivalinsecondlinechemotherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientswithbrafv600emutation
AT kadowakishigenori impactoftheglasgowprognosticscoreonsurvivalinsecondlinechemotherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientswithbrafv600emutation
AT uratakashi impactoftheglasgowprognosticscoreonsurvivalinsecondlinechemotherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientswithbrafv600emutation
AT andomasashi impactoftheglasgowprognosticscoreonsurvivalinsecondlinechemotherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientswithbrafv600emutation
AT tajikamasahiro impactoftheglasgowprognosticscoreonsurvivalinsecondlinechemotherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientswithbrafv600emutation
AT yatabeyasushi impactoftheglasgowprognosticscoreonsurvivalinsecondlinechemotherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientswithbrafv600emutation
AT murokei impactoftheglasgowprognosticscoreonsurvivalinsecondlinechemotherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientswithbrafv600emutation