Cargando…

Advance care planning in the context of clinical deterioration: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND: A Rapid Response Team can respond to critically ill patients in hospital to prevent further deterioration and unexpected deaths. However, approximately one-third of reviews involve a patient approaching the end-of-life. It is not well understood whether patients have pre-existing advance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pearse, Wendy, Oprescu, Florin, Endacott, John, Goodman, Sarah, Hyde, Mervyn, O’Neill, Maureen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6348551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30718959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1178224218823509
_version_ 1783390121323659264
author Pearse, Wendy
Oprescu, Florin
Endacott, John
Goodman, Sarah
Hyde, Mervyn
O’Neill, Maureen
author_facet Pearse, Wendy
Oprescu, Florin
Endacott, John
Goodman, Sarah
Hyde, Mervyn
O’Neill, Maureen
author_sort Pearse, Wendy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A Rapid Response Team can respond to critically ill patients in hospital to prevent further deterioration and unexpected deaths. However, approximately one-third of reviews involve a patient approaching the end-of-life. It is not well understood whether patients have pre-existing advance care plans at the time of significant clinical deterioration requiring Rapid Response Team review. Nor is it understood whether such critical events prompt patients, their families and treating teams to discuss advance care planning and consider referral to specialist palliative care services. AIM AND DESIGN: This systematic review examined advance care planning with patients who experience significant clinical deterioration in hospital and require Rapid Response Team review. The prevalence of pre-existing advance directives, whether this event prompts end-of-life discussions, the provision of broader advance care planning and referral to specialist palliative care services was examined. DATA SOURCES: Three electronic databases up to August 2017 were searched, and a manual review of article reference lists conducted. Quality of studies was appraised by the first and fourth authors. RESULTS: Of the 324 articles identified through database searching, 31 met the inclusion criteria, generating data from 47,850 patients. There was a low prevalence of resuscitation orders and formal advance directives prior to Rapid Response Team review, with subsequent increases in resuscitation and limitations of medical treatment orders, but not advance directives. There was high short- and long-term mortality following review, and low rates of palliative care referral. CONCLUSIONS: The failure of patients, their families and medical teams to engage in advance care planning may result in inappropriate Rapid Response Team review that is not in line with patient and family priorities and preferences. Earlier engagement in advance care planning may result in improved person-centred care and referral to specialist palliative care services for ongoing management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6348551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63485512019-02-04 Advance care planning in the context of clinical deterioration: a systematic review of the literature Pearse, Wendy Oprescu, Florin Endacott, John Goodman, Sarah Hyde, Mervyn O’Neill, Maureen Palliat Care Review BACKGROUND: A Rapid Response Team can respond to critically ill patients in hospital to prevent further deterioration and unexpected deaths. However, approximately one-third of reviews involve a patient approaching the end-of-life. It is not well understood whether patients have pre-existing advance care plans at the time of significant clinical deterioration requiring Rapid Response Team review. Nor is it understood whether such critical events prompt patients, their families and treating teams to discuss advance care planning and consider referral to specialist palliative care services. AIM AND DESIGN: This systematic review examined advance care planning with patients who experience significant clinical deterioration in hospital and require Rapid Response Team review. The prevalence of pre-existing advance directives, whether this event prompts end-of-life discussions, the provision of broader advance care planning and referral to specialist palliative care services was examined. DATA SOURCES: Three electronic databases up to August 2017 were searched, and a manual review of article reference lists conducted. Quality of studies was appraised by the first and fourth authors. RESULTS: Of the 324 articles identified through database searching, 31 met the inclusion criteria, generating data from 47,850 patients. There was a low prevalence of resuscitation orders and formal advance directives prior to Rapid Response Team review, with subsequent increases in resuscitation and limitations of medical treatment orders, but not advance directives. There was high short- and long-term mortality following review, and low rates of palliative care referral. CONCLUSIONS: The failure of patients, their families and medical teams to engage in advance care planning may result in inappropriate Rapid Response Team review that is not in line with patient and family priorities and preferences. Earlier engagement in advance care planning may result in improved person-centred care and referral to specialist palliative care services for ongoing management. SAGE Publications 2019-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6348551/ /pubmed/30718959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1178224218823509 Text en © The Author(s), 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review
Pearse, Wendy
Oprescu, Florin
Endacott, John
Goodman, Sarah
Hyde, Mervyn
O’Neill, Maureen
Advance care planning in the context of clinical deterioration: a systematic review of the literature
title Advance care planning in the context of clinical deterioration: a systematic review of the literature
title_full Advance care planning in the context of clinical deterioration: a systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Advance care planning in the context of clinical deterioration: a systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Advance care planning in the context of clinical deterioration: a systematic review of the literature
title_short Advance care planning in the context of clinical deterioration: a systematic review of the literature
title_sort advance care planning in the context of clinical deterioration: a systematic review of the literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6348551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30718959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1178224218823509
work_keys_str_mv AT pearsewendy advancecareplanninginthecontextofclinicaldeteriorationasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT oprescuflorin advancecareplanninginthecontextofclinicaldeteriorationasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT endacottjohn advancecareplanninginthecontextofclinicaldeteriorationasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT goodmansarah advancecareplanninginthecontextofclinicaldeteriorationasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT hydemervyn advancecareplanninginthecontextofclinicaldeteriorationasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT oneillmaureen advancecareplanninginthecontextofclinicaldeteriorationasystematicreviewoftheliterature