Cargando…
Correction to: Cost-effectiveness analysis of umeclidinium bromide/vilanterol 62.5/25 mcg versus tiotropium/olodaterol 5/5 mcg in symptomatic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a Spanish National Healthcare System perspective
Autores principales: | Driessen, M. T., Whalen, J., Buguth, B. Seewoodharry, Vallejo-Aparicio, L. A., Naya, I. P., Asukai, Y., Alcázar-Navarrete, B., Miravitlles, M., García-Río, F., Risebrough, N. A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6348614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30691468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-0985-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of umeclidinium bromide/vilanterol 62.5/25 mcg versus tiotropium/olodaterol 5/5 mcg in symptomatic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a Spanish National Healthcare System perspective
por: Driessen, M. T., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Evaluation of rescue medication use and medication adherence receiving umeclidinium/vilanterol versus tiotropium bromide/olodaterol
por: Moretz, Chad, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Tiotropium/Olodaterol in Maintenance-Naïve Patients with Moderate Symptomatic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis
por: Alcázar Navarrete, Bernardino, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Comparative Efficacy of Once-Daily Umeclidinium/Vilanterol and Tiotropium/Olodaterol Therapy in Symptomatic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Study
por: Feldman, Gregory J., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Safety and tolerability of once-daily umeclidinium/vilanterol 125/25 mcg and umeclidinium 125 mcg in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from a 52-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
por: Donohue, James F, et al.
Publicado: (2014)