Cargando…

Comparison of face-down posturing with nonsupine posturing after macular hole surgery: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: A few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated face-down posturing (FDP) with the far less physically challenging nonsupine posturing (NSP) in the treatment of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes (MHs). The objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of postoperativ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xia, Song, Zhao, Xin-yu, Wang, Er-qian, Chen, You-xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6348675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30691441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1047-8
_version_ 1783390143212683264
author Xia, Song
Zhao, Xin-yu
Wang, Er-qian
Chen, You-xin
author_facet Xia, Song
Zhao, Xin-yu
Wang, Er-qian
Chen, You-xin
author_sort Xia, Song
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated face-down posturing (FDP) with the far less physically challenging nonsupine posturing (NSP) in the treatment of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes (MHs). The objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of postoperative posturing on the anatomical and functional outcomes of MH surgery. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched from their earliest entries through December 2016 to identify the studies that had evaluated the effects of postoperative posturing with FDP or NSP for patients with MH surgery. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. The relevant data were analyzed using StataSE 12.0 software. The weighted mean difference (WMD), relative risk (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association. RESULTS: Our search yielded 181 records from which 11 studies comprising 726 cases that had examined the effects of postoperative posturing with FDP for patients compared with NSP after MH surgery were included for review and analysis. Our meta-analyses showed that postoperative FDP could generally improve the overall MH closure rate compared to NSP (OR = 1.828, 95% CI: 1.063~3.143, P = 0.029). Subgroup analysis of the size of MH suggested a significant benefit of FDP for large MHs (≥400 μm) (OR = 4.361, 95% CI: 1.429~13.305, P = 0.010) while there was no difference in the MH closure rate for small MHs (< 400 μm) (OR = 1.731, 95% CI: 0.412~7.270, P = 0.453). Moreover, ILM peeling for large MHs could significantly increase the MH closure rate of the FDP group (OR = 2.489, 95% CI: 1.021~6.069, P = 0.045), while no difference existed for small MHs (OR = 3.572, 95% CI: 0.547~23.331, P = 0.184). Combined cataract surgery might not influence the MH closure rate under any circumstance (OR = 0.513, 95% CI: 0.089~2.944, P = 0.454). CONCLUSION: Based on all the available evidence, our study found that FDP after MH surgery could generally improve the overall MH closure rate compared to NSP. For MHs larger than 400 μm, ILM peeling combined with FDP could significantly increase the MH closure rate. Combined cataract surgery might not influence the MH closure rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6348675
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63486752019-01-31 Comparison of face-down posturing with nonsupine posturing after macular hole surgery: a meta-analysis Xia, Song Zhao, Xin-yu Wang, Er-qian Chen, You-xin BMC Ophthalmol Database BACKGROUND: A few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated face-down posturing (FDP) with the far less physically challenging nonsupine posturing (NSP) in the treatment of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes (MHs). The objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of postoperative posturing on the anatomical and functional outcomes of MH surgery. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched from their earliest entries through December 2016 to identify the studies that had evaluated the effects of postoperative posturing with FDP or NSP for patients with MH surgery. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. The relevant data were analyzed using StataSE 12.0 software. The weighted mean difference (WMD), relative risk (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association. RESULTS: Our search yielded 181 records from which 11 studies comprising 726 cases that had examined the effects of postoperative posturing with FDP for patients compared with NSP after MH surgery were included for review and analysis. Our meta-analyses showed that postoperative FDP could generally improve the overall MH closure rate compared to NSP (OR = 1.828, 95% CI: 1.063~3.143, P = 0.029). Subgroup analysis of the size of MH suggested a significant benefit of FDP for large MHs (≥400 μm) (OR = 4.361, 95% CI: 1.429~13.305, P = 0.010) while there was no difference in the MH closure rate for small MHs (< 400 μm) (OR = 1.731, 95% CI: 0.412~7.270, P = 0.453). Moreover, ILM peeling for large MHs could significantly increase the MH closure rate of the FDP group (OR = 2.489, 95% CI: 1.021~6.069, P = 0.045), while no difference existed for small MHs (OR = 3.572, 95% CI: 0.547~23.331, P = 0.184). Combined cataract surgery might not influence the MH closure rate under any circumstance (OR = 0.513, 95% CI: 0.089~2.944, P = 0.454). CONCLUSION: Based on all the available evidence, our study found that FDP after MH surgery could generally improve the overall MH closure rate compared to NSP. For MHs larger than 400 μm, ILM peeling combined with FDP could significantly increase the MH closure rate. Combined cataract surgery might not influence the MH closure rate. BioMed Central 2019-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6348675/ /pubmed/30691441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1047-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Database
Xia, Song
Zhao, Xin-yu
Wang, Er-qian
Chen, You-xin
Comparison of face-down posturing with nonsupine posturing after macular hole surgery: a meta-analysis
title Comparison of face-down posturing with nonsupine posturing after macular hole surgery: a meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of face-down posturing with nonsupine posturing after macular hole surgery: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of face-down posturing with nonsupine posturing after macular hole surgery: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of face-down posturing with nonsupine posturing after macular hole surgery: a meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of face-down posturing with nonsupine posturing after macular hole surgery: a meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of face-down posturing with nonsupine posturing after macular hole surgery: a meta-analysis
topic Database
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6348675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30691441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1047-8
work_keys_str_mv AT xiasong comparisonoffacedownposturingwithnonsupineposturingaftermacularholesurgeryametaanalysis
AT zhaoxinyu comparisonoffacedownposturingwithnonsupineposturingaftermacularholesurgeryametaanalysis
AT wangerqian comparisonoffacedownposturingwithnonsupineposturingaftermacularholesurgeryametaanalysis
AT chenyouxin comparisonoffacedownposturingwithnonsupineposturingaftermacularholesurgeryametaanalysis