Cargando…
Evaluation of FISH for Blood Cultures under Diagnostic Real-Life Conditions
BACKGROUND: The study assessed a spectrum of previously published in-house fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) probes in a combined approach regarding their diagnostic performance with incubated blood culture materials. METHODS: Within a two-year interval, positive blood culture materials were...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Akadémiai Kiadó
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6348703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30719330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/1886.2018.00024 |
_version_ | 1783390149820809216 |
---|---|
author | Reitz, Annalena Poppert, Sven Rieker, Melanie Frickmann, Hagen |
author_facet | Reitz, Annalena Poppert, Sven Rieker, Melanie Frickmann, Hagen |
author_sort | Reitz, Annalena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The study assessed a spectrum of previously published in-house fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) probes in a combined approach regarding their diagnostic performance with incubated blood culture materials. METHODS: Within a two-year interval, positive blood culture materials were assessed with Gram and FISH staining. Previously described and new FISH probes were combined to panels for Gram-positive cocci in grape-like clusters and in chains, as well as for Gram-negative rod-shaped bacteria. Covered pathogens comprised Staphylococcus spp., such as S. aureus, Micrococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., including E. faecium, E. faecalis, and E. gallinarum, Streptococcus spp., like S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae, and S. pneumoniae, Enterobacteriaceae, such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Salmonella spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Bacteroides spp. RESULTS: A total of 955 blood culture materials were assessed with FISH. In 21 (2.2%) instances, FISH reaction led to non-interpretable results. With few exemptions, the tested FISH probes showed acceptable test characteristics even in the routine setting, with a sensitivity ranging from 28.6% (Bacteroides spp.) to 100% (6 probes) and a specificity of >95% in all instances. CONCLUSION: If sophisticated rapid diagnostic methods like mass spectrometry from blood culture materials are not available, FISH provides an option for rapid differentiation for laboratories in resource-limited settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6348703 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Akadémiai Kiadó |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63487032019-02-04 Evaluation of FISH for Blood Cultures under Diagnostic Real-Life Conditions Reitz, Annalena Poppert, Sven Rieker, Melanie Frickmann, Hagen Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp) Original Research Paper BACKGROUND: The study assessed a spectrum of previously published in-house fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) probes in a combined approach regarding their diagnostic performance with incubated blood culture materials. METHODS: Within a two-year interval, positive blood culture materials were assessed with Gram and FISH staining. Previously described and new FISH probes were combined to panels for Gram-positive cocci in grape-like clusters and in chains, as well as for Gram-negative rod-shaped bacteria. Covered pathogens comprised Staphylococcus spp., such as S. aureus, Micrococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., including E. faecium, E. faecalis, and E. gallinarum, Streptococcus spp., like S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae, and S. pneumoniae, Enterobacteriaceae, such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Salmonella spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Bacteroides spp. RESULTS: A total of 955 blood culture materials were assessed with FISH. In 21 (2.2%) instances, FISH reaction led to non-interpretable results. With few exemptions, the tested FISH probes showed acceptable test characteristics even in the routine setting, with a sensitivity ranging from 28.6% (Bacteroides spp.) to 100% (6 probes) and a specificity of >95% in all instances. CONCLUSION: If sophisticated rapid diagnostic methods like mass spectrometry from blood culture materials are not available, FISH provides an option for rapid differentiation for laboratories in resource-limited settings. Akadémiai Kiadó 2018-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6348703/ /pubmed/30719330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/1886.2018.00024 Text en © 2018, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial purposes, provided the original author and source are credited, a link to the CC License is provided, and changes - if any - are indicated. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Paper Reitz, Annalena Poppert, Sven Rieker, Melanie Frickmann, Hagen Evaluation of FISH for Blood Cultures under Diagnostic Real-Life Conditions |
title | Evaluation of FISH for Blood Cultures under Diagnostic Real-Life Conditions |
title_full | Evaluation of FISH for Blood Cultures under Diagnostic Real-Life Conditions |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of FISH for Blood Cultures under Diagnostic Real-Life Conditions |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of FISH for Blood Cultures under Diagnostic Real-Life Conditions |
title_short | Evaluation of FISH for Blood Cultures under Diagnostic Real-Life Conditions |
title_sort | evaluation of fish for blood cultures under diagnostic real-life conditions |
topic | Original Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6348703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30719330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/1886.2018.00024 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reitzannalena evaluationoffishforbloodculturesunderdiagnosticreallifeconditions AT poppertsven evaluationoffishforbloodculturesunderdiagnosticreallifeconditions AT riekermelanie evaluationoffishforbloodculturesunderdiagnosticreallifeconditions AT frickmannhagen evaluationoffishforbloodculturesunderdiagnosticreallifeconditions |