Cargando…

Evaluation of FISH for Blood Cultures under Diagnostic Real-Life Conditions

BACKGROUND: The study assessed a spectrum of previously published in-house fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) probes in a combined approach regarding their diagnostic performance with incubated blood culture materials. METHODS: Within a two-year interval, positive blood culture materials were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reitz, Annalena, Poppert, Sven, Rieker, Melanie, Frickmann, Hagen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Akadémiai Kiadó 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6348703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30719330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/1886.2018.00024
_version_ 1783390149820809216
author Reitz, Annalena
Poppert, Sven
Rieker, Melanie
Frickmann, Hagen
author_facet Reitz, Annalena
Poppert, Sven
Rieker, Melanie
Frickmann, Hagen
author_sort Reitz, Annalena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The study assessed a spectrum of previously published in-house fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) probes in a combined approach regarding their diagnostic performance with incubated blood culture materials. METHODS: Within a two-year interval, positive blood culture materials were assessed with Gram and FISH staining. Previously described and new FISH probes were combined to panels for Gram-positive cocci in grape-like clusters and in chains, as well as for Gram-negative rod-shaped bacteria. Covered pathogens comprised Staphylococcus spp., such as S. aureus, Micrococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., including E. faecium, E. faecalis, and E. gallinarum, Streptococcus spp., like S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae, and S. pneumoniae, Enterobacteriaceae, such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Salmonella spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Bacteroides spp. RESULTS: A total of 955 blood culture materials were assessed with FISH. In 21 (2.2%) instances, FISH reaction led to non-interpretable results. With few exemptions, the tested FISH probes showed acceptable test characteristics even in the routine setting, with a sensitivity ranging from 28.6% (Bacteroides spp.) to 100% (6 probes) and a specificity of >95% in all instances. CONCLUSION: If sophisticated rapid diagnostic methods like mass spectrometry from blood culture materials are not available, FISH provides an option for rapid differentiation for laboratories in resource-limited settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6348703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63487032019-02-04 Evaluation of FISH for Blood Cultures under Diagnostic Real-Life Conditions Reitz, Annalena Poppert, Sven Rieker, Melanie Frickmann, Hagen Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp) Original Research Paper BACKGROUND: The study assessed a spectrum of previously published in-house fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) probes in a combined approach regarding their diagnostic performance with incubated blood culture materials. METHODS: Within a two-year interval, positive blood culture materials were assessed with Gram and FISH staining. Previously described and new FISH probes were combined to panels for Gram-positive cocci in grape-like clusters and in chains, as well as for Gram-negative rod-shaped bacteria. Covered pathogens comprised Staphylococcus spp., such as S. aureus, Micrococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., including E. faecium, E. faecalis, and E. gallinarum, Streptococcus spp., like S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae, and S. pneumoniae, Enterobacteriaceae, such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Salmonella spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Bacteroides spp. RESULTS: A total of 955 blood culture materials were assessed with FISH. In 21 (2.2%) instances, FISH reaction led to non-interpretable results. With few exemptions, the tested FISH probes showed acceptable test characteristics even in the routine setting, with a sensitivity ranging from 28.6% (Bacteroides spp.) to 100% (6 probes) and a specificity of >95% in all instances. CONCLUSION: If sophisticated rapid diagnostic methods like mass spectrometry from blood culture materials are not available, FISH provides an option for rapid differentiation for laboratories in resource-limited settings. Akadémiai Kiadó 2018-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6348703/ /pubmed/30719330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/1886.2018.00024 Text en © 2018, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial purposes, provided the original author and source are credited, a link to the CC License is provided, and changes - if any - are indicated.
spellingShingle Original Research Paper
Reitz, Annalena
Poppert, Sven
Rieker, Melanie
Frickmann, Hagen
Evaluation of FISH for Blood Cultures under Diagnostic Real-Life Conditions
title Evaluation of FISH for Blood Cultures under Diagnostic Real-Life Conditions
title_full Evaluation of FISH for Blood Cultures under Diagnostic Real-Life Conditions
title_fullStr Evaluation of FISH for Blood Cultures under Diagnostic Real-Life Conditions
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of FISH for Blood Cultures under Diagnostic Real-Life Conditions
title_short Evaluation of FISH for Blood Cultures under Diagnostic Real-Life Conditions
title_sort evaluation of fish for blood cultures under diagnostic real-life conditions
topic Original Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6348703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30719330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/1886.2018.00024
work_keys_str_mv AT reitzannalena evaluationoffishforbloodculturesunderdiagnosticreallifeconditions
AT poppertsven evaluationoffishforbloodculturesunderdiagnosticreallifeconditions
AT riekermelanie evaluationoffishforbloodculturesunderdiagnosticreallifeconditions
AT frickmannhagen evaluationoffishforbloodculturesunderdiagnosticreallifeconditions