Cargando…

TearCare(®) system extension study: evaluation of the safety, effectiveness, and durability through 12 months of a second TearCare(®) treatment on subjects with dry eye disease

PURPOSE: Evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of a TearCare(®) retreatment in adult subjects with clinically significant dry eye disease (DED). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an extension of an initial 6-month, prospective, single-center, randomized, parallel-group pilot study. In the initial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Badawi, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6348966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30774298
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S191588
_version_ 1783390202004242432
author Badawi, David
author_facet Badawi, David
author_sort Badawi, David
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of a TearCare(®) retreatment in adult subjects with clinically significant dry eye disease (DED). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an extension of an initial 6-month, prospective, single-center, randomized, parallel-group pilot study. In the initial study, subjects with DED were randomized to either a single TearCare(®) treatment or 4 weeks of daily warm compress therapy. The extension study involved retreatment of those subjects assigned to the TearCare(®) treatment group following the initial 6-month end point. At 6 months, subjects were evaluated for the clinical signs and symptoms of DED prior to retreatment in the extension study that would measure the safety, effectiveness, and durability of a TearCare(®) retreatment for another 6 months through a 12-month end point. The TearCare(®) retreatment procedure consisted of 12 minutes of thermal eyelid treatment immediately followed by manual meibomian gland clearance. The primary effectiveness end point was the change in tear break-up time (TBUT) from baseline to 1-month follow-up. Secondary end points included meibomian gland scores, corneal and conjunctival staining scores, and assessment of dry eye symptoms. Safety was evaluated through monitoring intraocular pressure, best-corrected visual acuity, and device-related adverse events. RESULTS: Twelve subjects participated in the 6-month extension study. At 1-month clinic visit following retreatment, a significant improvement from baseline in mean (± SD) TBUT of 12.4 (±3.3) seconds was observed (P<0.001). Significant improvements in the mean change from baseline in meibomian gland scores, corneal and conjunctival staining scores, and symptoms of DED were also observed following retreatment. The second treatment was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The findings of the extension study through 12 months suggest that a second TearCare(®) treatment after 6 months provides additional improvement in the signs and symptoms of DED.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6348966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63489662019-02-15 TearCare(®) system extension study: evaluation of the safety, effectiveness, and durability through 12 months of a second TearCare(®) treatment on subjects with dry eye disease Badawi, David Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: Evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of a TearCare(®) retreatment in adult subjects with clinically significant dry eye disease (DED). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an extension of an initial 6-month, prospective, single-center, randomized, parallel-group pilot study. In the initial study, subjects with DED were randomized to either a single TearCare(®) treatment or 4 weeks of daily warm compress therapy. The extension study involved retreatment of those subjects assigned to the TearCare(®) treatment group following the initial 6-month end point. At 6 months, subjects were evaluated for the clinical signs and symptoms of DED prior to retreatment in the extension study that would measure the safety, effectiveness, and durability of a TearCare(®) retreatment for another 6 months through a 12-month end point. The TearCare(®) retreatment procedure consisted of 12 minutes of thermal eyelid treatment immediately followed by manual meibomian gland clearance. The primary effectiveness end point was the change in tear break-up time (TBUT) from baseline to 1-month follow-up. Secondary end points included meibomian gland scores, corneal and conjunctival staining scores, and assessment of dry eye symptoms. Safety was evaluated through monitoring intraocular pressure, best-corrected visual acuity, and device-related adverse events. RESULTS: Twelve subjects participated in the 6-month extension study. At 1-month clinic visit following retreatment, a significant improvement from baseline in mean (± SD) TBUT of 12.4 (±3.3) seconds was observed (P<0.001). Significant improvements in the mean change from baseline in meibomian gland scores, corneal and conjunctival staining scores, and symptoms of DED were also observed following retreatment. The second treatment was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The findings of the extension study through 12 months suggest that a second TearCare(®) treatment after 6 months provides additional improvement in the signs and symptoms of DED. Dove Medical Press 2019-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6348966/ /pubmed/30774298 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S191588 Text en © 2019 Badawi. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Badawi, David
TearCare(®) system extension study: evaluation of the safety, effectiveness, and durability through 12 months of a second TearCare(®) treatment on subjects with dry eye disease
title TearCare(®) system extension study: evaluation of the safety, effectiveness, and durability through 12 months of a second TearCare(®) treatment on subjects with dry eye disease
title_full TearCare(®) system extension study: evaluation of the safety, effectiveness, and durability through 12 months of a second TearCare(®) treatment on subjects with dry eye disease
title_fullStr TearCare(®) system extension study: evaluation of the safety, effectiveness, and durability through 12 months of a second TearCare(®) treatment on subjects with dry eye disease
title_full_unstemmed TearCare(®) system extension study: evaluation of the safety, effectiveness, and durability through 12 months of a second TearCare(®) treatment on subjects with dry eye disease
title_short TearCare(®) system extension study: evaluation of the safety, effectiveness, and durability through 12 months of a second TearCare(®) treatment on subjects with dry eye disease
title_sort tearcare(®) system extension study: evaluation of the safety, effectiveness, and durability through 12 months of a second tearcare(®) treatment on subjects with dry eye disease
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6348966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30774298
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S191588
work_keys_str_mv AT badawidavid tearcaresystemextensionstudyevaluationofthesafetyeffectivenessanddurabilitythrough12monthsofasecondtearcaretreatmentonsubjectswithdryeyedisease