Cargando…

Model uncertainty and simulated multispecies fisheries management advice in the Baltic Sea

Different ecosystem models often provide contrasting predictions (model uncertainty), which is perceived to be a major challenge impeding their use to support ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM). The focus of this manuscript is to examine the extent of model disagreements which could impact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bauer, Barbara, Horbowy, Jan, Rahikainen, Mika, Kulatska, Nataliia, Müller-Karulis, Bärbel, Tomczak, Maciej T., Bartolino, Valerio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6349338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30689653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211320
_version_ 1783390259070894080
author Bauer, Barbara
Horbowy, Jan
Rahikainen, Mika
Kulatska, Nataliia
Müller-Karulis, Bärbel
Tomczak, Maciej T.
Bartolino, Valerio
author_facet Bauer, Barbara
Horbowy, Jan
Rahikainen, Mika
Kulatska, Nataliia
Müller-Karulis, Bärbel
Tomczak, Maciej T.
Bartolino, Valerio
author_sort Bauer, Barbara
collection PubMed
description Different ecosystem models often provide contrasting predictions (model uncertainty), which is perceived to be a major challenge impeding their use to support ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM). The focus of this manuscript is to examine the extent of model disagreements which could impact management advice for EBFM in the central Baltic Sea. We compare how much three models (EwE, Gadget and a multispecies stock production model) differ in 1) their estimates of fishing mortality rates (Fs) satisfying alternative hypothetical management scenario objectives and 2) the outcomes of those scenarios in terms of performance indicators (spawning stock biomasses, catches, profits). Uncertainty in future environmental conditions affecting fish was taken into account by considering two seal population growth scenarios and two nutrient load scenarios. Differences in the development of the stocks, yields and profits exist among the models but the general patterns are also sufficiently similar to appear promising in the context of strategic fishery advice. Thus, we suggest that disagreements among the ecosystem models will not impede their use for providing strategic advice on how to reach management objectives that go beyond the traditional maximum yield targets and for informing on the potential consequences of pursuing such objectives. This is especially true for scenarios aiming at exploiting forage fish sprat and herring, for which the agreement was the largest among our models. However, the quantitative response to altering fishing pressure differed among models. This was due to the diverse environmental covariates and the different number of trophic relationships and their functional forms considered in the models. This suggests that ecosystem models can be used to provide quantitative advice only after more targeted research is conducted to gain a deeper understanding into the relationship between trophic links and fish population dynamics in the Baltic Sea.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6349338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63493382019-02-15 Model uncertainty and simulated multispecies fisheries management advice in the Baltic Sea Bauer, Barbara Horbowy, Jan Rahikainen, Mika Kulatska, Nataliia Müller-Karulis, Bärbel Tomczak, Maciej T. Bartolino, Valerio PLoS One Research Article Different ecosystem models often provide contrasting predictions (model uncertainty), which is perceived to be a major challenge impeding their use to support ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM). The focus of this manuscript is to examine the extent of model disagreements which could impact management advice for EBFM in the central Baltic Sea. We compare how much three models (EwE, Gadget and a multispecies stock production model) differ in 1) their estimates of fishing mortality rates (Fs) satisfying alternative hypothetical management scenario objectives and 2) the outcomes of those scenarios in terms of performance indicators (spawning stock biomasses, catches, profits). Uncertainty in future environmental conditions affecting fish was taken into account by considering two seal population growth scenarios and two nutrient load scenarios. Differences in the development of the stocks, yields and profits exist among the models but the general patterns are also sufficiently similar to appear promising in the context of strategic fishery advice. Thus, we suggest that disagreements among the ecosystem models will not impede their use for providing strategic advice on how to reach management objectives that go beyond the traditional maximum yield targets and for informing on the potential consequences of pursuing such objectives. This is especially true for scenarios aiming at exploiting forage fish sprat and herring, for which the agreement was the largest among our models. However, the quantitative response to altering fishing pressure differed among models. This was due to the diverse environmental covariates and the different number of trophic relationships and their functional forms considered in the models. This suggests that ecosystem models can be used to provide quantitative advice only after more targeted research is conducted to gain a deeper understanding into the relationship between trophic links and fish population dynamics in the Baltic Sea. Public Library of Science 2019-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6349338/ /pubmed/30689653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211320 Text en © 2019 Bauer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bauer, Barbara
Horbowy, Jan
Rahikainen, Mika
Kulatska, Nataliia
Müller-Karulis, Bärbel
Tomczak, Maciej T.
Bartolino, Valerio
Model uncertainty and simulated multispecies fisheries management advice in the Baltic Sea
title Model uncertainty and simulated multispecies fisheries management advice in the Baltic Sea
title_full Model uncertainty and simulated multispecies fisheries management advice in the Baltic Sea
title_fullStr Model uncertainty and simulated multispecies fisheries management advice in the Baltic Sea
title_full_unstemmed Model uncertainty and simulated multispecies fisheries management advice in the Baltic Sea
title_short Model uncertainty and simulated multispecies fisheries management advice in the Baltic Sea
title_sort model uncertainty and simulated multispecies fisheries management advice in the baltic sea
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6349338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30689653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211320
work_keys_str_mv AT bauerbarbara modeluncertaintyandsimulatedmultispeciesfisheriesmanagementadviceinthebalticsea
AT horbowyjan modeluncertaintyandsimulatedmultispeciesfisheriesmanagementadviceinthebalticsea
AT rahikainenmika modeluncertaintyandsimulatedmultispeciesfisheriesmanagementadviceinthebalticsea
AT kulatskanataliia modeluncertaintyandsimulatedmultispeciesfisheriesmanagementadviceinthebalticsea
AT mullerkarulisbarbel modeluncertaintyandsimulatedmultispeciesfisheriesmanagementadviceinthebalticsea
AT tomczakmaciejt modeluncertaintyandsimulatedmultispeciesfisheriesmanagementadviceinthebalticsea
AT bartolinovalerio modeluncertaintyandsimulatedmultispeciesfisheriesmanagementadviceinthebalticsea