Cargando…

Clinical performance of uncoated and precoated polymer mesh base ceramic brackets

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical performance of the two types of InVu ceramic brackets. The clinical performance of these brackets was measured by determining failure as well as survival rates and tie-wing fractures. Enamel surface evaluation following bracket and remnant removal was performed....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yılmaz (née Huda Abulkbash), Hüdanur, Elekdag-Türk, Selma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6349353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30687891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-018-0253-x
_version_ 1783390262695821312
author Yılmaz (née Huda Abulkbash), Hüdanur
Elekdag-Türk, Selma
author_facet Yılmaz (née Huda Abulkbash), Hüdanur
Elekdag-Türk, Selma
author_sort Yılmaz (née Huda Abulkbash), Hüdanur
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical performance of the two types of InVu ceramic brackets. The clinical performance of these brackets was measured by determining failure as well as survival rates and tie-wing fractures. Enamel surface evaluation following bracket and remnant removal was performed. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty non-extraction patients (31 females, 9 males) with a mean chronological age of 16 years 4 months composed this study. Bonding was performed with a split-mouth design using operator-coated and Readi-Base eXact InVu brackets. During the treatment period (45.89 ± 2.0 weeks), the failed brackets were recorded as well as the brackets with tie-wing fractures. Debracketing was undertaken with a ligature cutter (delamination technique) as recommended by the manufacturer. A modified remnant index (MRI) was used to visually evaluate the amount of remnants remaining on the tooth surface. Horizontal crack evaluation was carried out via transillumination. RESULTS: Operator-coated InVu brackets demonstrated a bond failure rate of 2.6%. This value was 6.8% for the Readi-Base eXact InVu brackets. Failure rates as well as survival rates presented a statistically significant difference (P = 0.006). A higher bond failure for the premolar teeth when compared to incisor teeth, as well as a higher bond failure in the lower arch when compared to the upper arch was found. These findings were statistically significant (P = 0.000 and P = 0.007, respectively). The effect of gender on bond failure rate (P = 0.508) and survival rate (P = 0.503) was not statistically significant. Both bracket types showed comparable results for tie-wing fractures (P = 0.174). A statistically significant difference was obtained for the MRI scores (P = 0.000). No horizontal enamel cracks were observed for both bracket types. CONCLUSION: The operator-coated InVu brackets demonstrated a lower failure rate when compared to the Readi-Base eXact pre-applied adhesive InVu brackets. The debonding procedure was safe for both bracket types.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6349353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63493532019-02-21 Clinical performance of uncoated and precoated polymer mesh base ceramic brackets Yılmaz (née Huda Abulkbash), Hüdanur Elekdag-Türk, Selma Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical performance of the two types of InVu ceramic brackets. The clinical performance of these brackets was measured by determining failure as well as survival rates and tie-wing fractures. Enamel surface evaluation following bracket and remnant removal was performed. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty non-extraction patients (31 females, 9 males) with a mean chronological age of 16 years 4 months composed this study. Bonding was performed with a split-mouth design using operator-coated and Readi-Base eXact InVu brackets. During the treatment period (45.89 ± 2.0 weeks), the failed brackets were recorded as well as the brackets with tie-wing fractures. Debracketing was undertaken with a ligature cutter (delamination technique) as recommended by the manufacturer. A modified remnant index (MRI) was used to visually evaluate the amount of remnants remaining on the tooth surface. Horizontal crack evaluation was carried out via transillumination. RESULTS: Operator-coated InVu brackets demonstrated a bond failure rate of 2.6%. This value was 6.8% for the Readi-Base eXact InVu brackets. Failure rates as well as survival rates presented a statistically significant difference (P = 0.006). A higher bond failure for the premolar teeth when compared to incisor teeth, as well as a higher bond failure in the lower arch when compared to the upper arch was found. These findings were statistically significant (P = 0.000 and P = 0.007, respectively). The effect of gender on bond failure rate (P = 0.508) and survival rate (P = 0.503) was not statistically significant. Both bracket types showed comparable results for tie-wing fractures (P = 0.174). A statistically significant difference was obtained for the MRI scores (P = 0.000). No horizontal enamel cracks were observed for both bracket types. CONCLUSION: The operator-coated InVu brackets demonstrated a lower failure rate when compared to the Readi-Base eXact pre-applied adhesive InVu brackets. The debonding procedure was safe for both bracket types. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6349353/ /pubmed/30687891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-018-0253-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Yılmaz (née Huda Abulkbash), Hüdanur
Elekdag-Türk, Selma
Clinical performance of uncoated and precoated polymer mesh base ceramic brackets
title Clinical performance of uncoated and precoated polymer mesh base ceramic brackets
title_full Clinical performance of uncoated and precoated polymer mesh base ceramic brackets
title_fullStr Clinical performance of uncoated and precoated polymer mesh base ceramic brackets
title_full_unstemmed Clinical performance of uncoated and precoated polymer mesh base ceramic brackets
title_short Clinical performance of uncoated and precoated polymer mesh base ceramic brackets
title_sort clinical performance of uncoated and precoated polymer mesh base ceramic brackets
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6349353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30687891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-018-0253-x
work_keys_str_mv AT yılmazneehudaabulkbashhudanur clinicalperformanceofuncoatedandprecoatedpolymermeshbaseceramicbrackets
AT elekdagturkselma clinicalperformanceofuncoatedandprecoatedpolymermeshbaseceramicbrackets