Cargando…

Analysis of Gastrointestinal Toxicity in Patients Receiving Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience

PURPOSE: We characterized both physician- and patient-reported rates of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in patients treated with proton beam therapy (PBT) at our institution for prostate adenocarcinoma and identified factors associated with toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We treated 192 patients wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Howard J., Macomber, Meghan W., Spraker, Matthew B., Bowen, Stephen R., Hippe, Daniel, Fung, Angela, Russell, Kenneth J., Laramore, George E., Rengan, Ramesh, Liao, Jay, Apisarnthanarax, Smith, Zeng, Jing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6349581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30706013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.08.002
_version_ 1783390283617009664
author Lee, Howard J.
Macomber, Meghan W.
Spraker, Matthew B.
Bowen, Stephen R.
Hippe, Daniel
Fung, Angela
Russell, Kenneth J.
Laramore, George E.
Rengan, Ramesh
Liao, Jay
Apisarnthanarax, Smith
Zeng, Jing
author_facet Lee, Howard J.
Macomber, Meghan W.
Spraker, Matthew B.
Bowen, Stephen R.
Hippe, Daniel
Fung, Angela
Russell, Kenneth J.
Laramore, George E.
Rengan, Ramesh
Liao, Jay
Apisarnthanarax, Smith
Zeng, Jing
author_sort Lee, Howard J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We characterized both physician- and patient-reported rates of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in patients treated with proton beam therapy (PBT) at our institution for prostate adenocarcinoma and identified factors associated with toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We treated 192 patients with PBT between July 2013 and July 2016. Included patients had ≥1 year of follow-up. Potential preexisting clinical and treatment-related risk factors for GI toxicity were recorded. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 was used to score toxicity. Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) bowel domain questionnaires assessed patient-reported quality of life. Associations between grade (GR) 2+ toxicity and clinical, treatment, and dosimetric factors were assessed using Cox models and corresponding hazard ratios. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 1.7 years. Most of the observed GI toxicity (>90%) was in the form of rectal bleeding (RB). GR2+ GI toxicity and RB actuarial rates specifically at 2 years were 21.3% and 20.4%, respectively. GR3 toxicity was rare, with only 1 observed RB event. No GR4/5 toxicity was seen. The EPIC bowel domain median score was 96 (range, 61-100) pretreatment, 93 (range, 41-100) at 1 year, 89 (range, 57-100) at 1.5 years, and 89 (range, 50-100) at 2 years. Anticoagulation use was the only factor selected during multivariate analysis for predicting GR2+ RB, with a resulting concordance index of 0.59 (95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.68; P = .088). Type of proton technology (pencil beam scanning vs uniform scanning) and number of fields treated per day (1 vs 2) showed no significant difference in toxicity rate. CONCLUSIONS: PBT was associated with acceptable rates of GR2+ transient GI toxicity, mostly in the form of RB, which correlated with anticoagulation use. High EPIC bowel domain quality of life was maintained in the 2 years after treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6349581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63495812019-01-31 Analysis of Gastrointestinal Toxicity in Patients Receiving Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience Lee, Howard J. Macomber, Meghan W. Spraker, Matthew B. Bowen, Stephen R. Hippe, Daniel Fung, Angela Russell, Kenneth J. Laramore, George E. Rengan, Ramesh Liao, Jay Apisarnthanarax, Smith Zeng, Jing Adv Radiat Oncol Genitourinary Cancer PURPOSE: We characterized both physician- and patient-reported rates of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in patients treated with proton beam therapy (PBT) at our institution for prostate adenocarcinoma and identified factors associated with toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We treated 192 patients with PBT between July 2013 and July 2016. Included patients had ≥1 year of follow-up. Potential preexisting clinical and treatment-related risk factors for GI toxicity were recorded. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 was used to score toxicity. Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) bowel domain questionnaires assessed patient-reported quality of life. Associations between grade (GR) 2+ toxicity and clinical, treatment, and dosimetric factors were assessed using Cox models and corresponding hazard ratios. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 1.7 years. Most of the observed GI toxicity (>90%) was in the form of rectal bleeding (RB). GR2+ GI toxicity and RB actuarial rates specifically at 2 years were 21.3% and 20.4%, respectively. GR3 toxicity was rare, with only 1 observed RB event. No GR4/5 toxicity was seen. The EPIC bowel domain median score was 96 (range, 61-100) pretreatment, 93 (range, 41-100) at 1 year, 89 (range, 57-100) at 1.5 years, and 89 (range, 50-100) at 2 years. Anticoagulation use was the only factor selected during multivariate analysis for predicting GR2+ RB, with a resulting concordance index of 0.59 (95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.68; P = .088). Type of proton technology (pencil beam scanning vs uniform scanning) and number of fields treated per day (1 vs 2) showed no significant difference in toxicity rate. CONCLUSIONS: PBT was associated with acceptable rates of GR2+ transient GI toxicity, mostly in the form of RB, which correlated with anticoagulation use. High EPIC bowel domain quality of life was maintained in the 2 years after treatment. Elsevier 2018-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6349581/ /pubmed/30706013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.08.002 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Genitourinary Cancer
Lee, Howard J.
Macomber, Meghan W.
Spraker, Matthew B.
Bowen, Stephen R.
Hippe, Daniel
Fung, Angela
Russell, Kenneth J.
Laramore, George E.
Rengan, Ramesh
Liao, Jay
Apisarnthanarax, Smith
Zeng, Jing
Analysis of Gastrointestinal Toxicity in Patients Receiving Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience
title Analysis of Gastrointestinal Toxicity in Patients Receiving Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience
title_full Analysis of Gastrointestinal Toxicity in Patients Receiving Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience
title_fullStr Analysis of Gastrointestinal Toxicity in Patients Receiving Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Gastrointestinal Toxicity in Patients Receiving Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience
title_short Analysis of Gastrointestinal Toxicity in Patients Receiving Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience
title_sort analysis of gastrointestinal toxicity in patients receiving proton beam therapy for prostate cancer: a single-institution experience
topic Genitourinary Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6349581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30706013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.08.002
work_keys_str_mv AT leehowardj analysisofgastrointestinaltoxicityinpatientsreceivingprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerasingleinstitutionexperience
AT macombermeghanw analysisofgastrointestinaltoxicityinpatientsreceivingprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerasingleinstitutionexperience
AT sprakermatthewb analysisofgastrointestinaltoxicityinpatientsreceivingprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerasingleinstitutionexperience
AT bowenstephenr analysisofgastrointestinaltoxicityinpatientsreceivingprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerasingleinstitutionexperience
AT hippedaniel analysisofgastrointestinaltoxicityinpatientsreceivingprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerasingleinstitutionexperience
AT fungangela analysisofgastrointestinaltoxicityinpatientsreceivingprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerasingleinstitutionexperience
AT russellkennethj analysisofgastrointestinaltoxicityinpatientsreceivingprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerasingleinstitutionexperience
AT laramoregeorgee analysisofgastrointestinaltoxicityinpatientsreceivingprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerasingleinstitutionexperience
AT renganramesh analysisofgastrointestinaltoxicityinpatientsreceivingprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerasingleinstitutionexperience
AT liaojay analysisofgastrointestinaltoxicityinpatientsreceivingprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerasingleinstitutionexperience
AT apisarnthanaraxsmith analysisofgastrointestinaltoxicityinpatientsreceivingprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerasingleinstitutionexperience
AT zengjing analysisofgastrointestinaltoxicityinpatientsreceivingprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerasingleinstitutionexperience