Cargando…
A Multi-Institutional Experience of MR-Guided Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
PURPOSE: Daily magnetic resonance (MR)–guided radiation has the potential to improve stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for tumors of the liver. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) introduces unique variables that are untested clinically: electron return effect, MRI geometric distortion, MRI to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6349638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30706022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.08.005 |
_version_ | 1783390291073433600 |
---|---|
author | Rosenberg, Stephen A. Henke, Lauren E. Shaverdian, Narek Mittauer, Kathryn Wojcieszynski, Andrzej P. Hullett, Craig R. Kamrava, Mitchell Lamb, James Cao, Minsong Green, Olga L. Kashani, Rojano Paliwal, Bhudatt Bayouth, John Harari, Paul M. Olsen, Jeffrey R. Lee, Percy Parikh, Parag J. Bassetti, Michael |
author_facet | Rosenberg, Stephen A. Henke, Lauren E. Shaverdian, Narek Mittauer, Kathryn Wojcieszynski, Andrzej P. Hullett, Craig R. Kamrava, Mitchell Lamb, James Cao, Minsong Green, Olga L. Kashani, Rojano Paliwal, Bhudatt Bayouth, John Harari, Paul M. Olsen, Jeffrey R. Lee, Percy Parikh, Parag J. Bassetti, Michael |
author_sort | Rosenberg, Stephen A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Daily magnetic resonance (MR)–guided radiation has the potential to improve stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for tumors of the liver. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) introduces unique variables that are untested clinically: electron return effect, MRI geometric distortion, MRI to radiation therapy isocenter uncertainty, multileaf collimator position error, and uncertainties with voxel size and tracking. All could lead to increased toxicity and/or local recurrences with SBRT. In this multi-institutional study, we hypothesized that direct visualization provided by MR guidance could allow the use of small treatment volumes to spare normal tissues while maintaining clinical outcomes despite the aforementioned uncertainties in MR-guided treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with primary liver tumors or metastatic lesions treated with MR-guided liver SBRT were reviewed at 3 institutions. Toxicity was assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4. Freedom from local progression (FFLP) and overall survival were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and χ(2) test. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 26 patients: 6 hepatocellular carcinomas, 2 cholangiocarcinomas, and 18 metastatic liver lesions (44% colorectal metastasis). The median follow-up was 21.2 months. The median dose delivered was 50 Gy at 10 Gy/fraction. No grade 4 or greater gastrointestinal toxicities were observed after treatment. The 1-year and 2-year overall survival in this cohort is 69% and 60%, respectively. At the median follow-up, FFLP for this cohort was 80.4%. FFLP for patients with hepatocellular carcinomas, colorectal metastasis, and all other lesions were 100%, 75%, and 83%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the first clinical outcomes of MR-guided liver SBRT. Treatment was well tolerated by patients with excellent local control. This study lays the foundation for future dose escalation and adaptive treatment for liver-based primary malignancies and/or metastatic disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6349638 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63496382019-01-31 A Multi-Institutional Experience of MR-Guided Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Rosenberg, Stephen A. Henke, Lauren E. Shaverdian, Narek Mittauer, Kathryn Wojcieszynski, Andrzej P. Hullett, Craig R. Kamrava, Mitchell Lamb, James Cao, Minsong Green, Olga L. Kashani, Rojano Paliwal, Bhudatt Bayouth, John Harari, Paul M. Olsen, Jeffrey R. Lee, Percy Parikh, Parag J. Bassetti, Michael Adv Radiat Oncol Physics Contribution PURPOSE: Daily magnetic resonance (MR)–guided radiation has the potential to improve stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for tumors of the liver. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) introduces unique variables that are untested clinically: electron return effect, MRI geometric distortion, MRI to radiation therapy isocenter uncertainty, multileaf collimator position error, and uncertainties with voxel size and tracking. All could lead to increased toxicity and/or local recurrences with SBRT. In this multi-institutional study, we hypothesized that direct visualization provided by MR guidance could allow the use of small treatment volumes to spare normal tissues while maintaining clinical outcomes despite the aforementioned uncertainties in MR-guided treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with primary liver tumors or metastatic lesions treated with MR-guided liver SBRT were reviewed at 3 institutions. Toxicity was assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4. Freedom from local progression (FFLP) and overall survival were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and χ(2) test. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 26 patients: 6 hepatocellular carcinomas, 2 cholangiocarcinomas, and 18 metastatic liver lesions (44% colorectal metastasis). The median follow-up was 21.2 months. The median dose delivered was 50 Gy at 10 Gy/fraction. No grade 4 or greater gastrointestinal toxicities were observed after treatment. The 1-year and 2-year overall survival in this cohort is 69% and 60%, respectively. At the median follow-up, FFLP for this cohort was 80.4%. FFLP for patients with hepatocellular carcinomas, colorectal metastasis, and all other lesions were 100%, 75%, and 83%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the first clinical outcomes of MR-guided liver SBRT. Treatment was well tolerated by patients with excellent local control. This study lays the foundation for future dose escalation and adaptive treatment for liver-based primary malignancies and/or metastatic disease. Elsevier 2018-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6349638/ /pubmed/30706022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.08.005 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Physics Contribution Rosenberg, Stephen A. Henke, Lauren E. Shaverdian, Narek Mittauer, Kathryn Wojcieszynski, Andrzej P. Hullett, Craig R. Kamrava, Mitchell Lamb, James Cao, Minsong Green, Olga L. Kashani, Rojano Paliwal, Bhudatt Bayouth, John Harari, Paul M. Olsen, Jeffrey R. Lee, Percy Parikh, Parag J. Bassetti, Michael A Multi-Institutional Experience of MR-Guided Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy |
title | A Multi-Institutional Experience of MR-Guided Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy |
title_full | A Multi-Institutional Experience of MR-Guided Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy |
title_fullStr | A Multi-Institutional Experience of MR-Guided Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | A Multi-Institutional Experience of MR-Guided Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy |
title_short | A Multi-Institutional Experience of MR-Guided Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy |
title_sort | multi-institutional experience of mr-guided liver stereotactic body radiation therapy |
topic | Physics Contribution |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6349638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30706022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.08.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosenbergstephena amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT henkelaurene amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT shaverdiannarek amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT mittauerkathryn amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT wojcieszynskiandrzejp amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT hullettcraigr amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT kamravamitchell amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT lambjames amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT caominsong amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT greenolgal amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT kashanirojano amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT paliwalbhudatt amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT bayouthjohn amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT hararipaulm amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT olsenjeffreyr amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT leepercy amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT parikhparagj amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT bassettimichael amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT rosenbergstephena multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT henkelaurene multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT shaverdiannarek multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT mittauerkathryn multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT wojcieszynskiandrzejp multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT hullettcraigr multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT kamravamitchell multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT lambjames multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT caominsong multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT greenolgal multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT kashanirojano multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT paliwalbhudatt multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT bayouthjohn multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT hararipaulm multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT olsenjeffreyr multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT leepercy multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT parikhparagj multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT bassettimichael multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy |