Cargando…

A Multi-Institutional Experience of MR-Guided Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE: Daily magnetic resonance (MR)–guided radiation has the potential to improve stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for tumors of the liver. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) introduces unique variables that are untested clinically: electron return effect, MRI geometric distortion, MRI to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosenberg, Stephen A., Henke, Lauren E., Shaverdian, Narek, Mittauer, Kathryn, Wojcieszynski, Andrzej P., Hullett, Craig R., Kamrava, Mitchell, Lamb, James, Cao, Minsong, Green, Olga L., Kashani, Rojano, Paliwal, Bhudatt, Bayouth, John, Harari, Paul M., Olsen, Jeffrey R., Lee, Percy, Parikh, Parag J., Bassetti, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6349638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30706022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.08.005
_version_ 1783390291073433600
author Rosenberg, Stephen A.
Henke, Lauren E.
Shaverdian, Narek
Mittauer, Kathryn
Wojcieszynski, Andrzej P.
Hullett, Craig R.
Kamrava, Mitchell
Lamb, James
Cao, Minsong
Green, Olga L.
Kashani, Rojano
Paliwal, Bhudatt
Bayouth, John
Harari, Paul M.
Olsen, Jeffrey R.
Lee, Percy
Parikh, Parag J.
Bassetti, Michael
author_facet Rosenberg, Stephen A.
Henke, Lauren E.
Shaverdian, Narek
Mittauer, Kathryn
Wojcieszynski, Andrzej P.
Hullett, Craig R.
Kamrava, Mitchell
Lamb, James
Cao, Minsong
Green, Olga L.
Kashani, Rojano
Paliwal, Bhudatt
Bayouth, John
Harari, Paul M.
Olsen, Jeffrey R.
Lee, Percy
Parikh, Parag J.
Bassetti, Michael
author_sort Rosenberg, Stephen A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Daily magnetic resonance (MR)–guided radiation has the potential to improve stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for tumors of the liver. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) introduces unique variables that are untested clinically: electron return effect, MRI geometric distortion, MRI to radiation therapy isocenter uncertainty, multileaf collimator position error, and uncertainties with voxel size and tracking. All could lead to increased toxicity and/or local recurrences with SBRT. In this multi-institutional study, we hypothesized that direct visualization provided by MR guidance could allow the use of small treatment volumes to spare normal tissues while maintaining clinical outcomes despite the aforementioned uncertainties in MR-guided treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with primary liver tumors or metastatic lesions treated with MR-guided liver SBRT were reviewed at 3 institutions. Toxicity was assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4. Freedom from local progression (FFLP) and overall survival were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and χ(2) test. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 26 patients: 6 hepatocellular carcinomas, 2 cholangiocarcinomas, and 18 metastatic liver lesions (44% colorectal metastasis). The median follow-up was 21.2 months. The median dose delivered was 50 Gy at 10 Gy/fraction. No grade 4 or greater gastrointestinal toxicities were observed after treatment. The 1-year and 2-year overall survival in this cohort is 69% and 60%, respectively. At the median follow-up, FFLP for this cohort was 80.4%. FFLP for patients with hepatocellular carcinomas, colorectal metastasis, and all other lesions were 100%, 75%, and 83%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the first clinical outcomes of MR-guided liver SBRT. Treatment was well tolerated by patients with excellent local control. This study lays the foundation for future dose escalation and adaptive treatment for liver-based primary malignancies and/or metastatic disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6349638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63496382019-01-31 A Multi-Institutional Experience of MR-Guided Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Rosenberg, Stephen A. Henke, Lauren E. Shaverdian, Narek Mittauer, Kathryn Wojcieszynski, Andrzej P. Hullett, Craig R. Kamrava, Mitchell Lamb, James Cao, Minsong Green, Olga L. Kashani, Rojano Paliwal, Bhudatt Bayouth, John Harari, Paul M. Olsen, Jeffrey R. Lee, Percy Parikh, Parag J. Bassetti, Michael Adv Radiat Oncol Physics Contribution PURPOSE: Daily magnetic resonance (MR)–guided radiation has the potential to improve stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for tumors of the liver. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) introduces unique variables that are untested clinically: electron return effect, MRI geometric distortion, MRI to radiation therapy isocenter uncertainty, multileaf collimator position error, and uncertainties with voxel size and tracking. All could lead to increased toxicity and/or local recurrences with SBRT. In this multi-institutional study, we hypothesized that direct visualization provided by MR guidance could allow the use of small treatment volumes to spare normal tissues while maintaining clinical outcomes despite the aforementioned uncertainties in MR-guided treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with primary liver tumors or metastatic lesions treated with MR-guided liver SBRT were reviewed at 3 institutions. Toxicity was assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4. Freedom from local progression (FFLP) and overall survival were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and χ(2) test. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 26 patients: 6 hepatocellular carcinomas, 2 cholangiocarcinomas, and 18 metastatic liver lesions (44% colorectal metastasis). The median follow-up was 21.2 months. The median dose delivered was 50 Gy at 10 Gy/fraction. No grade 4 or greater gastrointestinal toxicities were observed after treatment. The 1-year and 2-year overall survival in this cohort is 69% and 60%, respectively. At the median follow-up, FFLP for this cohort was 80.4%. FFLP for patients with hepatocellular carcinomas, colorectal metastasis, and all other lesions were 100%, 75%, and 83%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the first clinical outcomes of MR-guided liver SBRT. Treatment was well tolerated by patients with excellent local control. This study lays the foundation for future dose escalation and adaptive treatment for liver-based primary malignancies and/or metastatic disease. Elsevier 2018-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6349638/ /pubmed/30706022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.08.005 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Physics Contribution
Rosenberg, Stephen A.
Henke, Lauren E.
Shaverdian, Narek
Mittauer, Kathryn
Wojcieszynski, Andrzej P.
Hullett, Craig R.
Kamrava, Mitchell
Lamb, James
Cao, Minsong
Green, Olga L.
Kashani, Rojano
Paliwal, Bhudatt
Bayouth, John
Harari, Paul M.
Olsen, Jeffrey R.
Lee, Percy
Parikh, Parag J.
Bassetti, Michael
A Multi-Institutional Experience of MR-Guided Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
title A Multi-Institutional Experience of MR-Guided Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
title_full A Multi-Institutional Experience of MR-Guided Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
title_fullStr A Multi-Institutional Experience of MR-Guided Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
title_full_unstemmed A Multi-Institutional Experience of MR-Guided Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
title_short A Multi-Institutional Experience of MR-Guided Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
title_sort multi-institutional experience of mr-guided liver stereotactic body radiation therapy
topic Physics Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6349638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30706022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.08.005
work_keys_str_mv AT rosenbergstephena amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT henkelaurene amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT shaverdiannarek amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT mittauerkathryn amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT wojcieszynskiandrzejp amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT hullettcraigr amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT kamravamitchell amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT lambjames amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT caominsong amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT greenolgal amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT kashanirojano amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT paliwalbhudatt amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT bayouthjohn amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT hararipaulm amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT olsenjeffreyr amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT leepercy amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT parikhparagj amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT bassettimichael amultiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT rosenbergstephena multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT henkelaurene multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT shaverdiannarek multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT mittauerkathryn multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT wojcieszynskiandrzejp multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT hullettcraigr multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT kamravamitchell multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT lambjames multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT caominsong multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT greenolgal multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT kashanirojano multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT paliwalbhudatt multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT bayouthjohn multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT hararipaulm multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT olsenjeffreyr multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT leepercy multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT parikhparagj multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT bassettimichael multiinstitutionalexperienceofmrguidedliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy