Cargando…
Visual Hebb Repetition Effects: The Role of Psychological Distinctiveness Revisited
Across two experiments we investigate the role of psychological distinctiveness on the Hebb repetition effect. In direct contradiction to Horton et al. (2008), Experiment 1 demonstrated the Hebb repetition effect for inverted faces. Importantly, the Hebb repetition effect was evident only when the f...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6349752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30723438 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00017 |
_version_ | 1783390308007936000 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, Andrew J. Miles, Christopher |
author_facet | Johnson, Andrew J. Miles, Christopher |
author_sort | Johnson, Andrew J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Across two experiments we investigate the role of psychological distinctiveness on the Hebb repetition effect. In direct contradiction to Horton et al. (2008), Experiment 1 demonstrated the Hebb repetition effect for inverted faces. Importantly, the Hebb repetition effect was evident only when the filler and Hebb sequences comprised different items (no-stimulus-overlap) and was abolished when the filler and Hebb trials comprised the same items (full-stimulus-overlap). Experiment 2 further examined the impact of psychological distinctiveness on the Hebb repetition effect by comparing serial recall for upright unfamiliar-faces, inverted unfamiliar-faces, and abstract matrices. We demonstrate the visual Hebb repetition effect for stimuli that possess both purportedly high (upright faces) and low (inverted faces and matrices) levels of psychological distinctiveness. The findings of both experiments contradict the earlier claim (Horton et al., 2008) that stimuli possessing low levels of psychological distinctiveness do not show the visual Hebb repetition effect. However, we further highlight the importance of stimulus overlap between filler and Hebb sequences in determining the visual Hebb repetition effect. More generally, our findings emphasize that the Hebb repetition effect is a common feature of memory across different stimulus types. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6349752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63497522019-02-05 Visual Hebb Repetition Effects: The Role of Psychological Distinctiveness Revisited Johnson, Andrew J. Miles, Christopher Front Psychol Psychology Across two experiments we investigate the role of psychological distinctiveness on the Hebb repetition effect. In direct contradiction to Horton et al. (2008), Experiment 1 demonstrated the Hebb repetition effect for inverted faces. Importantly, the Hebb repetition effect was evident only when the filler and Hebb sequences comprised different items (no-stimulus-overlap) and was abolished when the filler and Hebb trials comprised the same items (full-stimulus-overlap). Experiment 2 further examined the impact of psychological distinctiveness on the Hebb repetition effect by comparing serial recall for upright unfamiliar-faces, inverted unfamiliar-faces, and abstract matrices. We demonstrate the visual Hebb repetition effect for stimuli that possess both purportedly high (upright faces) and low (inverted faces and matrices) levels of psychological distinctiveness. The findings of both experiments contradict the earlier claim (Horton et al., 2008) that stimuli possessing low levels of psychological distinctiveness do not show the visual Hebb repetition effect. However, we further highlight the importance of stimulus overlap between filler and Hebb sequences in determining the visual Hebb repetition effect. More generally, our findings emphasize that the Hebb repetition effect is a common feature of memory across different stimulus types. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6349752/ /pubmed/30723438 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00017 Text en Copyright © 2019 Johnson and Miles. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Johnson, Andrew J. Miles, Christopher Visual Hebb Repetition Effects: The Role of Psychological Distinctiveness Revisited |
title | Visual Hebb Repetition Effects: The Role of Psychological Distinctiveness Revisited |
title_full | Visual Hebb Repetition Effects: The Role of Psychological Distinctiveness Revisited |
title_fullStr | Visual Hebb Repetition Effects: The Role of Psychological Distinctiveness Revisited |
title_full_unstemmed | Visual Hebb Repetition Effects: The Role of Psychological Distinctiveness Revisited |
title_short | Visual Hebb Repetition Effects: The Role of Psychological Distinctiveness Revisited |
title_sort | visual hebb repetition effects: the role of psychological distinctiveness revisited |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6349752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30723438 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsonandrewj visualhebbrepetitioneffectstheroleofpsychologicaldistinctivenessrevisited AT mileschristopher visualhebbrepetitioneffectstheroleofpsychologicaldistinctivenessrevisited |