Cargando…
Progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: comparative genomic sequencing
Several models have been described as potential mechanisms for the progression of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive breast cancer (IBC). The aim of our study was to increase our understanding of DCIS progression by using massive parallel sequencing of synchronous DCIS and IBC. We included...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6349789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30284611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-018-2463-5 |
_version_ | 1783390317774372864 |
---|---|
author | Doebar, S. C. Krol, N. M. van Marion, R. Brouwer, R. W. W. van Ijcken, W. F. J. Martens, J. M. Dinjens, W. N. M. van Deurzen, C. H. M. |
author_facet | Doebar, S. C. Krol, N. M. van Marion, R. Brouwer, R. W. W. van Ijcken, W. F. J. Martens, J. M. Dinjens, W. N. M. van Deurzen, C. H. M. |
author_sort | Doebar, S. C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Several models have been described as potential mechanisms for the progression of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive breast cancer (IBC). The aim of our study was to increase our understanding of DCIS progression by using massive parallel sequencing of synchronous DCIS and IBC. We included patients with synchronous DCIS and IBC (n = 4). Initially, IBC and normal tissue were subjected to whole exome sequencing. Subsequently, targeted sequencing was performed to validate those tumor-specific variants identified by whole exome sequencing. Finally, we analyzed whether those specific variants of the invasive component were also present in the DCIS component. There was a high genomic concordance between synchronous DCIS and IBC (52 out of 92 mutations were present in both components). However, the remaining mutations (40 out of 92) were restricted to the invasive component. The proportion of tumor cells with these mutations was higher in the invasive component compared to the DCIS component in a subset of patients. Our findings support the theory that the progression from DCIS to IBC could be driven by the selection of subclones with specific genetic aberrations. This knowledge improves our understanding of DCIS progression, which may lead to the identification of potential markers of progression and novel therapeutic targets in order to develop a more personalized treatment of patients with DCIS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6349789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63497892019-02-15 Progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: comparative genomic sequencing Doebar, S. C. Krol, N. M. van Marion, R. Brouwer, R. W. W. van Ijcken, W. F. J. Martens, J. M. Dinjens, W. N. M. van Deurzen, C. H. M. Virchows Arch Brief Report Several models have been described as potential mechanisms for the progression of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive breast cancer (IBC). The aim of our study was to increase our understanding of DCIS progression by using massive parallel sequencing of synchronous DCIS and IBC. We included patients with synchronous DCIS and IBC (n = 4). Initially, IBC and normal tissue were subjected to whole exome sequencing. Subsequently, targeted sequencing was performed to validate those tumor-specific variants identified by whole exome sequencing. Finally, we analyzed whether those specific variants of the invasive component were also present in the DCIS component. There was a high genomic concordance between synchronous DCIS and IBC (52 out of 92 mutations were present in both components). However, the remaining mutations (40 out of 92) were restricted to the invasive component. The proportion of tumor cells with these mutations was higher in the invasive component compared to the DCIS component in a subset of patients. Our findings support the theory that the progression from DCIS to IBC could be driven by the selection of subclones with specific genetic aberrations. This knowledge improves our understanding of DCIS progression, which may lead to the identification of potential markers of progression and novel therapeutic targets in order to develop a more personalized treatment of patients with DCIS. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-10-04 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6349789/ /pubmed/30284611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-018-2463-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Doebar, S. C. Krol, N. M. van Marion, R. Brouwer, R. W. W. van Ijcken, W. F. J. Martens, J. M. Dinjens, W. N. M. van Deurzen, C. H. M. Progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: comparative genomic sequencing |
title | Progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: comparative genomic sequencing |
title_full | Progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: comparative genomic sequencing |
title_fullStr | Progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: comparative genomic sequencing |
title_full_unstemmed | Progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: comparative genomic sequencing |
title_short | Progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: comparative genomic sequencing |
title_sort | progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: comparative genomic sequencing |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6349789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30284611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-018-2463-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT doebarsc progressionofductalcarcinomainsitutoinvasivebreastcancercomparativegenomicsequencing AT krolnm progressionofductalcarcinomainsitutoinvasivebreastcancercomparativegenomicsequencing AT vanmarionr progressionofductalcarcinomainsitutoinvasivebreastcancercomparativegenomicsequencing AT brouwerrww progressionofductalcarcinomainsitutoinvasivebreastcancercomparativegenomicsequencing AT vanijckenwfj progressionofductalcarcinomainsitutoinvasivebreastcancercomparativegenomicsequencing AT martensjm progressionofductalcarcinomainsitutoinvasivebreastcancercomparativegenomicsequencing AT dinjenswnm progressionofductalcarcinomainsitutoinvasivebreastcancercomparativegenomicsequencing AT vandeurzenchm progressionofductalcarcinomainsitutoinvasivebreastcancercomparativegenomicsequencing |