Cargando…

Progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: comparative genomic sequencing

Several models have been described as potential mechanisms for the progression of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive breast cancer (IBC). The aim of our study was to increase our understanding of DCIS progression by using massive parallel sequencing of synchronous DCIS and IBC. We included...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doebar, S. C., Krol, N. M., van Marion, R., Brouwer, R. W. W., van Ijcken, W. F. J., Martens, J. M., Dinjens, W. N. M., van Deurzen, C. H. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6349789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30284611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-018-2463-5
_version_ 1783390317774372864
author Doebar, S. C.
Krol, N. M.
van Marion, R.
Brouwer, R. W. W.
van Ijcken, W. F. J.
Martens, J. M.
Dinjens, W. N. M.
van Deurzen, C. H. M.
author_facet Doebar, S. C.
Krol, N. M.
van Marion, R.
Brouwer, R. W. W.
van Ijcken, W. F. J.
Martens, J. M.
Dinjens, W. N. M.
van Deurzen, C. H. M.
author_sort Doebar, S. C.
collection PubMed
description Several models have been described as potential mechanisms for the progression of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive breast cancer (IBC). The aim of our study was to increase our understanding of DCIS progression by using massive parallel sequencing of synchronous DCIS and IBC. We included patients with synchronous DCIS and IBC (n = 4). Initially, IBC and normal tissue were subjected to whole exome sequencing. Subsequently, targeted sequencing was performed to validate those tumor-specific variants identified by whole exome sequencing. Finally, we analyzed whether those specific variants of the invasive component were also present in the DCIS component. There was a high genomic concordance between synchronous DCIS and IBC (52 out of 92 mutations were present in both components). However, the remaining mutations (40 out of 92) were restricted to the invasive component. The proportion of tumor cells with these mutations was higher in the invasive component compared to the DCIS component in a subset of patients. Our findings support the theory that the progression from DCIS to IBC could be driven by the selection of subclones with specific genetic aberrations. This knowledge improves our understanding of DCIS progression, which may lead to the identification of potential markers of progression and novel therapeutic targets in order to develop a more personalized treatment of patients with DCIS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6349789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63497892019-02-15 Progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: comparative genomic sequencing Doebar, S. C. Krol, N. M. van Marion, R. Brouwer, R. W. W. van Ijcken, W. F. J. Martens, J. M. Dinjens, W. N. M. van Deurzen, C. H. M. Virchows Arch Brief Report Several models have been described as potential mechanisms for the progression of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive breast cancer (IBC). The aim of our study was to increase our understanding of DCIS progression by using massive parallel sequencing of synchronous DCIS and IBC. We included patients with synchronous DCIS and IBC (n = 4). Initially, IBC and normal tissue were subjected to whole exome sequencing. Subsequently, targeted sequencing was performed to validate those tumor-specific variants identified by whole exome sequencing. Finally, we analyzed whether those specific variants of the invasive component were also present in the DCIS component. There was a high genomic concordance between synchronous DCIS and IBC (52 out of 92 mutations were present in both components). However, the remaining mutations (40 out of 92) were restricted to the invasive component. The proportion of tumor cells with these mutations was higher in the invasive component compared to the DCIS component in a subset of patients. Our findings support the theory that the progression from DCIS to IBC could be driven by the selection of subclones with specific genetic aberrations. This knowledge improves our understanding of DCIS progression, which may lead to the identification of potential markers of progression and novel therapeutic targets in order to develop a more personalized treatment of patients with DCIS. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-10-04 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6349789/ /pubmed/30284611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-018-2463-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Doebar, S. C.
Krol, N. M.
van Marion, R.
Brouwer, R. W. W.
van Ijcken, W. F. J.
Martens, J. M.
Dinjens, W. N. M.
van Deurzen, C. H. M.
Progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: comparative genomic sequencing
title Progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: comparative genomic sequencing
title_full Progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: comparative genomic sequencing
title_fullStr Progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: comparative genomic sequencing
title_full_unstemmed Progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: comparative genomic sequencing
title_short Progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: comparative genomic sequencing
title_sort progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: comparative genomic sequencing
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6349789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30284611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-018-2463-5
work_keys_str_mv AT doebarsc progressionofductalcarcinomainsitutoinvasivebreastcancercomparativegenomicsequencing
AT krolnm progressionofductalcarcinomainsitutoinvasivebreastcancercomparativegenomicsequencing
AT vanmarionr progressionofductalcarcinomainsitutoinvasivebreastcancercomparativegenomicsequencing
AT brouwerrww progressionofductalcarcinomainsitutoinvasivebreastcancercomparativegenomicsequencing
AT vanijckenwfj progressionofductalcarcinomainsitutoinvasivebreastcancercomparativegenomicsequencing
AT martensjm progressionofductalcarcinomainsitutoinvasivebreastcancercomparativegenomicsequencing
AT dinjenswnm progressionofductalcarcinomainsitutoinvasivebreastcancercomparativegenomicsequencing
AT vandeurzenchm progressionofductalcarcinomainsitutoinvasivebreastcancercomparativegenomicsequencing