Cargando…
Strengthening the Health Workforce through the ECHO Stages of Participation: Participants’ Perspectives on Key Facilitators and Barriers
INTRODUCTION: Project Extension for Community Health Outcomes (ECHO) was originally developed by the University of New Mexico’s Health Science Center (UNMHSC) to build the capacities of primary-care providers and to increase specialty-care access to rural and underserved populations. ECHO Colorado,...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6350124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30729170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2382120518820922 |
_version_ | 1783390390505701376 |
---|---|
author | Shimasaki, Suzuho Bishop, Erin Guthrie, Michelle Thomas, John F (Fred) |
author_facet | Shimasaki, Suzuho Bishop, Erin Guthrie, Michelle Thomas, John F (Fred) |
author_sort | Shimasaki, Suzuho |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Project Extension for Community Health Outcomes (ECHO) was originally developed by the University of New Mexico’s Health Science Center (UNMHSC) to build the capacities of primary-care providers and to increase specialty-care access to rural and underserved populations. ECHO Colorado, a replication site at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (CUAMC), was developed with the same purpose and to help build the health workforce of Colorado. The CUAMC and its community-based partners recognized that by reducing unnecessary referrals to the medical campus and building primary-care capacity in communities, both would increase their scope and expand overall capacity. This study examines the key factors that influence participant engagement, how participants value the ECHO experience, and the utility of the ECHO Colorado experience according to participants. METHODS: This study used a mixed-methods approach including 42 interviews and 34 completed surveys. Transcribed interview recordings were coded in NVivo 11, and codes were queried in NVivo and Excel to identify key themes. Survey responses were analyzed in SPSS. Data were examined between and across four attendance groups and triangulated to assess the reliability of the data and validity of overall findings. FINDINGS: Key factors increasing registrant engagement included relevant and practical curriculum content; strong and supportive relationships among learners, ECHO faculty, and workplace colleagues; and innovative learning approaches that included opportunities for active, virtual participation through technology, participant management activities, and ECHO’s unique curriculum design. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study validated many of the important elements of ECHO Colorado that make it unique from other iterations of the model being implemented nationally and internationally and identified participant-driven strategies for further amplifying its impact. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6350124 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63501242019-02-06 Strengthening the Health Workforce through the ECHO Stages of Participation: Participants’ Perspectives on Key Facilitators and Barriers Shimasaki, Suzuho Bishop, Erin Guthrie, Michelle Thomas, John F (Fred) J Med Educ Curric Dev Original Research INTRODUCTION: Project Extension for Community Health Outcomes (ECHO) was originally developed by the University of New Mexico’s Health Science Center (UNMHSC) to build the capacities of primary-care providers and to increase specialty-care access to rural and underserved populations. ECHO Colorado, a replication site at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (CUAMC), was developed with the same purpose and to help build the health workforce of Colorado. The CUAMC and its community-based partners recognized that by reducing unnecessary referrals to the medical campus and building primary-care capacity in communities, both would increase their scope and expand overall capacity. This study examines the key factors that influence participant engagement, how participants value the ECHO experience, and the utility of the ECHO Colorado experience according to participants. METHODS: This study used a mixed-methods approach including 42 interviews and 34 completed surveys. Transcribed interview recordings were coded in NVivo 11, and codes were queried in NVivo and Excel to identify key themes. Survey responses were analyzed in SPSS. Data were examined between and across four attendance groups and triangulated to assess the reliability of the data and validity of overall findings. FINDINGS: Key factors increasing registrant engagement included relevant and practical curriculum content; strong and supportive relationships among learners, ECHO faculty, and workplace colleagues; and innovative learning approaches that included opportunities for active, virtual participation through technology, participant management activities, and ECHO’s unique curriculum design. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study validated many of the important elements of ECHO Colorado that make it unique from other iterations of the model being implemented nationally and internationally and identified participant-driven strategies for further amplifying its impact. SAGE Publications 2019-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6350124/ /pubmed/30729170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2382120518820922 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Shimasaki, Suzuho Bishop, Erin Guthrie, Michelle Thomas, John F (Fred) Strengthening the Health Workforce through the ECHO Stages of Participation: Participants’ Perspectives on Key Facilitators and Barriers |
title | Strengthening the Health Workforce through the ECHO Stages of
Participation: Participants’ Perspectives on Key Facilitators and
Barriers |
title_full | Strengthening the Health Workforce through the ECHO Stages of
Participation: Participants’ Perspectives on Key Facilitators and
Barriers |
title_fullStr | Strengthening the Health Workforce through the ECHO Stages of
Participation: Participants’ Perspectives on Key Facilitators and
Barriers |
title_full_unstemmed | Strengthening the Health Workforce through the ECHO Stages of
Participation: Participants’ Perspectives on Key Facilitators and
Barriers |
title_short | Strengthening the Health Workforce through the ECHO Stages of
Participation: Participants’ Perspectives on Key Facilitators and
Barriers |
title_sort | strengthening the health workforce through the echo stages of
participation: participants’ perspectives on key facilitators and
barriers |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6350124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30729170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2382120518820922 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shimasakisuzuho strengtheningthehealthworkforcethroughtheechostagesofparticipationparticipantsperspectivesonkeyfacilitatorsandbarriers AT bishoperin strengtheningthehealthworkforcethroughtheechostagesofparticipationparticipantsperspectivesonkeyfacilitatorsandbarriers AT guthriemichelle strengtheningthehealthworkforcethroughtheechostagesofparticipationparticipantsperspectivesonkeyfacilitatorsandbarriers AT thomasjohnffred strengtheningthehealthworkforcethroughtheechostagesofparticipationparticipantsperspectivesonkeyfacilitatorsandbarriers |