Cargando…

Strengthening the Health Workforce through the ECHO Stages of Participation: Participants’ Perspectives on Key Facilitators and Barriers

INTRODUCTION: Project Extension for Community Health Outcomes (ECHO) was originally developed by the University of New Mexico’s Health Science Center (UNMHSC) to build the capacities of primary-care providers and to increase specialty-care access to rural and underserved populations. ECHO Colorado,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shimasaki, Suzuho, Bishop, Erin, Guthrie, Michelle, Thomas, John F (Fred)
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6350124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30729170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2382120518820922
_version_ 1783390390505701376
author Shimasaki, Suzuho
Bishop, Erin
Guthrie, Michelle
Thomas, John F (Fred)
author_facet Shimasaki, Suzuho
Bishop, Erin
Guthrie, Michelle
Thomas, John F (Fred)
author_sort Shimasaki, Suzuho
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Project Extension for Community Health Outcomes (ECHO) was originally developed by the University of New Mexico’s Health Science Center (UNMHSC) to build the capacities of primary-care providers and to increase specialty-care access to rural and underserved populations. ECHO Colorado, a replication site at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (CUAMC), was developed with the same purpose and to help build the health workforce of Colorado. The CUAMC and its community-based partners recognized that by reducing unnecessary referrals to the medical campus and building primary-care capacity in communities, both would increase their scope and expand overall capacity. This study examines the key factors that influence participant engagement, how participants value the ECHO experience, and the utility of the ECHO Colorado experience according to participants. METHODS: This study used a mixed-methods approach including 42 interviews and 34 completed surveys. Transcribed interview recordings were coded in NVivo 11, and codes were queried in NVivo and Excel to identify key themes. Survey responses were analyzed in SPSS. Data were examined between and across four attendance groups and triangulated to assess the reliability of the data and validity of overall findings. FINDINGS: Key factors increasing registrant engagement included relevant and practical curriculum content; strong and supportive relationships among learners, ECHO faculty, and workplace colleagues; and innovative learning approaches that included opportunities for active, virtual participation through technology, participant management activities, and ECHO’s unique curriculum design. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study validated many of the important elements of ECHO Colorado that make it unique from other iterations of the model being implemented nationally and internationally and identified participant-driven strategies for further amplifying its impact.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6350124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63501242019-02-06 Strengthening the Health Workforce through the ECHO Stages of Participation: Participants’ Perspectives on Key Facilitators and Barriers Shimasaki, Suzuho Bishop, Erin Guthrie, Michelle Thomas, John F (Fred) J Med Educ Curric Dev Original Research INTRODUCTION: Project Extension for Community Health Outcomes (ECHO) was originally developed by the University of New Mexico’s Health Science Center (UNMHSC) to build the capacities of primary-care providers and to increase specialty-care access to rural and underserved populations. ECHO Colorado, a replication site at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (CUAMC), was developed with the same purpose and to help build the health workforce of Colorado. The CUAMC and its community-based partners recognized that by reducing unnecessary referrals to the medical campus and building primary-care capacity in communities, both would increase their scope and expand overall capacity. This study examines the key factors that influence participant engagement, how participants value the ECHO experience, and the utility of the ECHO Colorado experience according to participants. METHODS: This study used a mixed-methods approach including 42 interviews and 34 completed surveys. Transcribed interview recordings were coded in NVivo 11, and codes were queried in NVivo and Excel to identify key themes. Survey responses were analyzed in SPSS. Data were examined between and across four attendance groups and triangulated to assess the reliability of the data and validity of overall findings. FINDINGS: Key factors increasing registrant engagement included relevant and practical curriculum content; strong and supportive relationships among learners, ECHO faculty, and workplace colleagues; and innovative learning approaches that included opportunities for active, virtual participation through technology, participant management activities, and ECHO’s unique curriculum design. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study validated many of the important elements of ECHO Colorado that make it unique from other iterations of the model being implemented nationally and internationally and identified participant-driven strategies for further amplifying its impact. SAGE Publications 2019-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6350124/ /pubmed/30729170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2382120518820922 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Shimasaki, Suzuho
Bishop, Erin
Guthrie, Michelle
Thomas, John F (Fred)
Strengthening the Health Workforce through the ECHO Stages of Participation: Participants’ Perspectives on Key Facilitators and Barriers
title Strengthening the Health Workforce through the ECHO Stages of Participation: Participants’ Perspectives on Key Facilitators and Barriers
title_full Strengthening the Health Workforce through the ECHO Stages of Participation: Participants’ Perspectives on Key Facilitators and Barriers
title_fullStr Strengthening the Health Workforce through the ECHO Stages of Participation: Participants’ Perspectives on Key Facilitators and Barriers
title_full_unstemmed Strengthening the Health Workforce through the ECHO Stages of Participation: Participants’ Perspectives on Key Facilitators and Barriers
title_short Strengthening the Health Workforce through the ECHO Stages of Participation: Participants’ Perspectives on Key Facilitators and Barriers
title_sort strengthening the health workforce through the echo stages of participation: participants’ perspectives on key facilitators and barriers
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6350124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30729170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2382120518820922
work_keys_str_mv AT shimasakisuzuho strengtheningthehealthworkforcethroughtheechostagesofparticipationparticipantsperspectivesonkeyfacilitatorsandbarriers
AT bishoperin strengtheningthehealthworkforcethroughtheechostagesofparticipationparticipantsperspectivesonkeyfacilitatorsandbarriers
AT guthriemichelle strengtheningthehealthworkforcethroughtheechostagesofparticipationparticipantsperspectivesonkeyfacilitatorsandbarriers
AT thomasjohnffred strengtheningthehealthworkforcethroughtheechostagesofparticipationparticipantsperspectivesonkeyfacilitatorsandbarriers