Cargando…

Sigh maneuver to enhance assessment of fluid responsiveness during pressure support ventilation

BACKGROUND: Assessment of fluid responsiveness is problematic in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, in particular for those undergoing modes of partial support, such as pressure support ventilation (PSV). We propose a new test, based on application of a ventilator-generated sigh, to predict fluid r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Messina, Antonio, Colombo, Davide, Barra, Federico Lorenzo, Cammarota, Gianmaria, De Mattei, Giacomo, Longhini, Federico, Romagnoli, Stefano, DellaCorte, Francesco, De Backer, Daniel, Cecconi, Maurizio, Navalesi, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6350369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30691523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2294-4
_version_ 1783390440732491776
author Messina, Antonio
Colombo, Davide
Barra, Federico Lorenzo
Cammarota, Gianmaria
De Mattei, Giacomo
Longhini, Federico
Romagnoli, Stefano
DellaCorte, Francesco
De Backer, Daniel
Cecconi, Maurizio
Navalesi, Paolo
author_facet Messina, Antonio
Colombo, Davide
Barra, Federico Lorenzo
Cammarota, Gianmaria
De Mattei, Giacomo
Longhini, Federico
Romagnoli, Stefano
DellaCorte, Francesco
De Backer, Daniel
Cecconi, Maurizio
Navalesi, Paolo
author_sort Messina, Antonio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Assessment of fluid responsiveness is problematic in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, in particular for those undergoing modes of partial support, such as pressure support ventilation (PSV). We propose a new test, based on application of a ventilator-generated sigh, to predict fluid responsiveness in ICU patients undergoing PSV. METHODS: This was a prospective bi-centric interventional study conducted in two general ICUs. In 40 critically ill patients with a stable ventilatory PSV pattern and requiring volume expansion (VE), we assessed the variations in arterial systolic pressure (SAP), pulse pressure (PP) and stroke volume index (SVI) consequent to random application of 4-s sighs at three different inspiratory pressures. A radial arterial signal was directed to the MOSTCARE™ pulse contour hemodynamic monitoring system for hemodynamic measurements. Data obtained during sigh tests were recorded beat by beat, while all the hemodynamic parameters were averaged over 30 s for the remaining period of the study protocol. VE consisted of 500 mL of crystalloids over 10 min. A patient was considered a responder if a VE-induced increase in cardiac index (CI) ≥ 15% was observed. RESULTS: The slopes for SAP, SVI and PP of were all significantly different between responders and non-responders (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0004 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The AUC of the slope of SAP (0.99; sensitivity 100.0% (79.4–100.0%) and specificity 95.8% (78.8–99.9%) was significantly greater than the AUC for PP (0.91) and SVI (0.83) (p = 0.04 and 0.009, respectively). The SAP slope best threshold value of the ROC curve was − 4.4° from baseline. The only parameter found to be independently associated with fluid responsiveness among those included in the logistic regression was the slope for SAP (p = 0.009; odds ratio 0.27 (95% confidence interval (CI(95)) 0.10–0.70)). The effects produced by the sigh at 35 cmH(2)0 (Sigh(35)) are significantly different between responders and non-responders. For a 35% reduction in PP from baseline, the AUC was 0.91 (CI(95) 0.82–0.99), with sensitivity 75.0% and specificity 91.6%. CONCLUSIONS: In a selected ICU population undergoing PSV, analysis of the slope for SAP after the application of three successive sighs and the nadir of PP after Sigh(35) reliably predict fluid responsiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12615001232527. Registered on 10 November 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2294-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6350369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63503692019-02-04 Sigh maneuver to enhance assessment of fluid responsiveness during pressure support ventilation Messina, Antonio Colombo, Davide Barra, Federico Lorenzo Cammarota, Gianmaria De Mattei, Giacomo Longhini, Federico Romagnoli, Stefano DellaCorte, Francesco De Backer, Daniel Cecconi, Maurizio Navalesi, Paolo Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Assessment of fluid responsiveness is problematic in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, in particular for those undergoing modes of partial support, such as pressure support ventilation (PSV). We propose a new test, based on application of a ventilator-generated sigh, to predict fluid responsiveness in ICU patients undergoing PSV. METHODS: This was a prospective bi-centric interventional study conducted in two general ICUs. In 40 critically ill patients with a stable ventilatory PSV pattern and requiring volume expansion (VE), we assessed the variations in arterial systolic pressure (SAP), pulse pressure (PP) and stroke volume index (SVI) consequent to random application of 4-s sighs at three different inspiratory pressures. A radial arterial signal was directed to the MOSTCARE™ pulse contour hemodynamic monitoring system for hemodynamic measurements. Data obtained during sigh tests were recorded beat by beat, while all the hemodynamic parameters were averaged over 30 s for the remaining period of the study protocol. VE consisted of 500 mL of crystalloids over 10 min. A patient was considered a responder if a VE-induced increase in cardiac index (CI) ≥ 15% was observed. RESULTS: The slopes for SAP, SVI and PP of were all significantly different between responders and non-responders (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0004 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The AUC of the slope of SAP (0.99; sensitivity 100.0% (79.4–100.0%) and specificity 95.8% (78.8–99.9%) was significantly greater than the AUC for PP (0.91) and SVI (0.83) (p = 0.04 and 0.009, respectively). The SAP slope best threshold value of the ROC curve was − 4.4° from baseline. The only parameter found to be independently associated with fluid responsiveness among those included in the logistic regression was the slope for SAP (p = 0.009; odds ratio 0.27 (95% confidence interval (CI(95)) 0.10–0.70)). The effects produced by the sigh at 35 cmH(2)0 (Sigh(35)) are significantly different between responders and non-responders. For a 35% reduction in PP from baseline, the AUC was 0.91 (CI(95) 0.82–0.99), with sensitivity 75.0% and specificity 91.6%. CONCLUSIONS: In a selected ICU population undergoing PSV, analysis of the slope for SAP after the application of three successive sighs and the nadir of PP after Sigh(35) reliably predict fluid responsiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12615001232527. Registered on 10 November 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2294-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6350369/ /pubmed/30691523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2294-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Messina, Antonio
Colombo, Davide
Barra, Federico Lorenzo
Cammarota, Gianmaria
De Mattei, Giacomo
Longhini, Federico
Romagnoli, Stefano
DellaCorte, Francesco
De Backer, Daniel
Cecconi, Maurizio
Navalesi, Paolo
Sigh maneuver to enhance assessment of fluid responsiveness during pressure support ventilation
title Sigh maneuver to enhance assessment of fluid responsiveness during pressure support ventilation
title_full Sigh maneuver to enhance assessment of fluid responsiveness during pressure support ventilation
title_fullStr Sigh maneuver to enhance assessment of fluid responsiveness during pressure support ventilation
title_full_unstemmed Sigh maneuver to enhance assessment of fluid responsiveness during pressure support ventilation
title_short Sigh maneuver to enhance assessment of fluid responsiveness during pressure support ventilation
title_sort sigh maneuver to enhance assessment of fluid responsiveness during pressure support ventilation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6350369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30691523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2294-4
work_keys_str_mv AT messinaantonio sighmaneuvertoenhanceassessmentoffluidresponsivenessduringpressuresupportventilation
AT colombodavide sighmaneuvertoenhanceassessmentoffluidresponsivenessduringpressuresupportventilation
AT barrafedericolorenzo sighmaneuvertoenhanceassessmentoffluidresponsivenessduringpressuresupportventilation
AT cammarotagianmaria sighmaneuvertoenhanceassessmentoffluidresponsivenessduringpressuresupportventilation
AT dematteigiacomo sighmaneuvertoenhanceassessmentoffluidresponsivenessduringpressuresupportventilation
AT longhinifederico sighmaneuvertoenhanceassessmentoffluidresponsivenessduringpressuresupportventilation
AT romagnolistefano sighmaneuvertoenhanceassessmentoffluidresponsivenessduringpressuresupportventilation
AT dellacortefrancesco sighmaneuvertoenhanceassessmentoffluidresponsivenessduringpressuresupportventilation
AT debackerdaniel sighmaneuvertoenhanceassessmentoffluidresponsivenessduringpressuresupportventilation
AT cecconimaurizio sighmaneuvertoenhanceassessmentoffluidresponsivenessduringpressuresupportventilation
AT navalesipaolo sighmaneuvertoenhanceassessmentoffluidresponsivenessduringpressuresupportventilation