Cargando…

Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma spp., Ehrlichia spp. and Dirofilaria immitis in Canadian dogs, 2008 to 2015: a repeat cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Vector-borne pathogens are emerging concerns in multiple regions of Canada. Determining regional prevalence of canine vector-borne pathogens and documenting change will improve clinician awareness, enable targeted prevention, enhance diagnosis and ideally reduce the risk of disease. Stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evason, Michelle, Stull, Jason W., Pearl, David L., Peregrine, Andrew S., Jardine, Claire, Buch, Jesse S., Lailer, Zachary, O’Connor, Tom, Chandrashekar, Ramaswamy, Weese, J. Scott
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6350403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30691522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3299-9
_version_ 1783390448673357824
author Evason, Michelle
Stull, Jason W.
Pearl, David L.
Peregrine, Andrew S.
Jardine, Claire
Buch, Jesse S.
Lailer, Zachary
O’Connor, Tom
Chandrashekar, Ramaswamy
Weese, J. Scott
author_facet Evason, Michelle
Stull, Jason W.
Pearl, David L.
Peregrine, Andrew S.
Jardine, Claire
Buch, Jesse S.
Lailer, Zachary
O’Connor, Tom
Chandrashekar, Ramaswamy
Weese, J. Scott
author_sort Evason, Michelle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vector-borne pathogens are emerging concerns in multiple regions of Canada. Determining regional prevalence of canine vector-borne pathogens and documenting change will improve clinician awareness, enable targeted prevention, enhance diagnosis and ideally reduce the risk of disease. Study objectives were to: (i) estimate the prevalence of positive canine vector-borne test results from samples submitted in Canada; (ii) assess change in prevalence over time, from baseline (2008) to 2015; and (iii) estimate the prevalence of pathogen co-infections. METHODS: This repeat cross-sectional study evaluated 753,468 test results for D. immitis antigen and B. burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis/ewingii/muris serology, and 753,208 test results for Anaplasma phagocytophilum/platys serology using the SNAP® 4Dx®Test and SNAP 4Dx® Plus Test. RESULTS: Based on all submitted samples from Canada (2008–2015), the period seroprevalence of B. burgdorferi, Ehrlichia spp., Anaplasma spp. and D. immitis antigen were 2.0%, 0.5%, 0.4% and 0.2%, respectively. Over the 7 years (2008 compared to 2015) we observed a significant increase in seroprevalence for B. burgdorferi (144.4%) and Ehrlichia spp. (150%). Co-infections (positive for two or more pathogens on a single 4 pathogen test kit) were estimated at 5.4% (1162/21,612) of total positive tests. CONCLUSIONS: The temporal rise and geographical differences in prevalence detected for these pathogens (notably B. burgdorferi) are consistent with anecdotal information on canine illness related to tick-borne pathogen exposure in multiple regions of Canada, particularly canine Lyme disease. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13071-019-3299-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6350403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63504032019-02-04 Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma spp., Ehrlichia spp. and Dirofilaria immitis in Canadian dogs, 2008 to 2015: a repeat cross-sectional study Evason, Michelle Stull, Jason W. Pearl, David L. Peregrine, Andrew S. Jardine, Claire Buch, Jesse S. Lailer, Zachary O’Connor, Tom Chandrashekar, Ramaswamy Weese, J. Scott Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Vector-borne pathogens are emerging concerns in multiple regions of Canada. Determining regional prevalence of canine vector-borne pathogens and documenting change will improve clinician awareness, enable targeted prevention, enhance diagnosis and ideally reduce the risk of disease. Study objectives were to: (i) estimate the prevalence of positive canine vector-borne test results from samples submitted in Canada; (ii) assess change in prevalence over time, from baseline (2008) to 2015; and (iii) estimate the prevalence of pathogen co-infections. METHODS: This repeat cross-sectional study evaluated 753,468 test results for D. immitis antigen and B. burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis/ewingii/muris serology, and 753,208 test results for Anaplasma phagocytophilum/platys serology using the SNAP® 4Dx®Test and SNAP 4Dx® Plus Test. RESULTS: Based on all submitted samples from Canada (2008–2015), the period seroprevalence of B. burgdorferi, Ehrlichia spp., Anaplasma spp. and D. immitis antigen were 2.0%, 0.5%, 0.4% and 0.2%, respectively. Over the 7 years (2008 compared to 2015) we observed a significant increase in seroprevalence for B. burgdorferi (144.4%) and Ehrlichia spp. (150%). Co-infections (positive for two or more pathogens on a single 4 pathogen test kit) were estimated at 5.4% (1162/21,612) of total positive tests. CONCLUSIONS: The temporal rise and geographical differences in prevalence detected for these pathogens (notably B. burgdorferi) are consistent with anecdotal information on canine illness related to tick-borne pathogen exposure in multiple regions of Canada, particularly canine Lyme disease. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13071-019-3299-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6350403/ /pubmed/30691522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3299-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Evason, Michelle
Stull, Jason W.
Pearl, David L.
Peregrine, Andrew S.
Jardine, Claire
Buch, Jesse S.
Lailer, Zachary
O’Connor, Tom
Chandrashekar, Ramaswamy
Weese, J. Scott
Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma spp., Ehrlichia spp. and Dirofilaria immitis in Canadian dogs, 2008 to 2015: a repeat cross-sectional study
title Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma spp., Ehrlichia spp. and Dirofilaria immitis in Canadian dogs, 2008 to 2015: a repeat cross-sectional study
title_full Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma spp., Ehrlichia spp. and Dirofilaria immitis in Canadian dogs, 2008 to 2015: a repeat cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma spp., Ehrlichia spp. and Dirofilaria immitis in Canadian dogs, 2008 to 2015: a repeat cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma spp., Ehrlichia spp. and Dirofilaria immitis in Canadian dogs, 2008 to 2015: a repeat cross-sectional study
title_short Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma spp., Ehrlichia spp. and Dirofilaria immitis in Canadian dogs, 2008 to 2015: a repeat cross-sectional study
title_sort prevalence of borrelia burgdorferi, anaplasma spp., ehrlichia spp. and dirofilaria immitis in canadian dogs, 2008 to 2015: a repeat cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6350403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30691522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3299-9
work_keys_str_mv AT evasonmichelle prevalenceofborreliaburgdorferianaplasmasppehrlichiasppanddirofilariaimmitisincanadiandogs2008to2015arepeatcrosssectionalstudy
AT stulljasonw prevalenceofborreliaburgdorferianaplasmasppehrlichiasppanddirofilariaimmitisincanadiandogs2008to2015arepeatcrosssectionalstudy
AT pearldavidl prevalenceofborreliaburgdorferianaplasmasppehrlichiasppanddirofilariaimmitisincanadiandogs2008to2015arepeatcrosssectionalstudy
AT peregrineandrews prevalenceofborreliaburgdorferianaplasmasppehrlichiasppanddirofilariaimmitisincanadiandogs2008to2015arepeatcrosssectionalstudy
AT jardineclaire prevalenceofborreliaburgdorferianaplasmasppehrlichiasppanddirofilariaimmitisincanadiandogs2008to2015arepeatcrosssectionalstudy
AT buchjesses prevalenceofborreliaburgdorferianaplasmasppehrlichiasppanddirofilariaimmitisincanadiandogs2008to2015arepeatcrosssectionalstudy
AT lailerzachary prevalenceofborreliaburgdorferianaplasmasppehrlichiasppanddirofilariaimmitisincanadiandogs2008to2015arepeatcrosssectionalstudy
AT oconnortom prevalenceofborreliaburgdorferianaplasmasppehrlichiasppanddirofilariaimmitisincanadiandogs2008to2015arepeatcrosssectionalstudy
AT chandrashekarramaswamy prevalenceofborreliaburgdorferianaplasmasppehrlichiasppanddirofilariaimmitisincanadiandogs2008to2015arepeatcrosssectionalstudy
AT weesejscott prevalenceofborreliaburgdorferianaplasmasppehrlichiasppanddirofilariaimmitisincanadiandogs2008to2015arepeatcrosssectionalstudy