Cargando…

Comparison of Hemodynamic Response and Postoperative Pain Score between General Anaesthesia with Intravenous Analgesia versus General Anesthesia with Caudal Analgesia in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Open-Heart Surgery

CONTEXT: Regional anesthesia may attenuate adverse physiological stress responses associated with cardiothoracic surgery. In this study, hemodynamic stress response at the different time of surgical stimuli was compared between patients receiving general anesthesia (GA) along with caudal epidural an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Samantaray, Dharma Jivan, Trehan, Meena, Chowdhry, Vivek, Reedy, Satish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6350425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30648677
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_215_17
_version_ 1783390452348616704
author Samantaray, Dharma Jivan
Trehan, Meena
Chowdhry, Vivek
Reedy, Satish
author_facet Samantaray, Dharma Jivan
Trehan, Meena
Chowdhry, Vivek
Reedy, Satish
author_sort Samantaray, Dharma Jivan
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Regional anesthesia may attenuate adverse physiological stress responses associated with cardiothoracic surgery. In this study, hemodynamic stress response at the different time of surgical stimuli was compared between patients receiving general anesthesia (GA) along with caudal epidural analgesia with GA with intravenous analgesia in pediatric population undergoing open-heart surgery. AIMS: This study aims to compare the hemodynamic response at the different time of surgical stimuli and postoperative pain score, in pediatric patients undergoing open-heart procedures. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: We designed a prospective randomized controlled trial to study hemodynamic effects between Group I and Group II. Fifty patients were randomly allocated equally into Group I (GA + caudal epidural) and Group II (GA + intravenous analgesia) by sealed envelope technique. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: After obtaining approval from Institutional Ethical Committee, this prospective study was conducted in 50 American Society of Anesthesiologist Classes II and III pediatric patients aged between 1 and 12 years posted for cardiac surgery in our institution. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: ANOVA, two-way ANOVA, and Student's test. RESULTS: The heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean blood pressure variations were compared between Groups I and II at different time intervals. The variations were found to be significantly higher at the time of skin incision and 2 min after skin incision in Group II as compared to Group I. Pain score was compared between the groups and was found to be significantly lower with Group I (2.5 ± 1.2) as compared to Group II (4.6 ± 1.7), P = (0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Caudal analgesia with GA (Group I) was found to have better hemodynamic control and significantly better postoperative pain relief in the first 24 h after awakening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6350425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63504252019-03-08 Comparison of Hemodynamic Response and Postoperative Pain Score between General Anaesthesia with Intravenous Analgesia versus General Anesthesia with Caudal Analgesia in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Open-Heart Surgery Samantaray, Dharma Jivan Trehan, Meena Chowdhry, Vivek Reedy, Satish Ann Card Anaesth Original Article CONTEXT: Regional anesthesia may attenuate adverse physiological stress responses associated with cardiothoracic surgery. In this study, hemodynamic stress response at the different time of surgical stimuli was compared between patients receiving general anesthesia (GA) along with caudal epidural analgesia with GA with intravenous analgesia in pediatric population undergoing open-heart surgery. AIMS: This study aims to compare the hemodynamic response at the different time of surgical stimuli and postoperative pain score, in pediatric patients undergoing open-heart procedures. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: We designed a prospective randomized controlled trial to study hemodynamic effects between Group I and Group II. Fifty patients were randomly allocated equally into Group I (GA + caudal epidural) and Group II (GA + intravenous analgesia) by sealed envelope technique. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: After obtaining approval from Institutional Ethical Committee, this prospective study was conducted in 50 American Society of Anesthesiologist Classes II and III pediatric patients aged between 1 and 12 years posted for cardiac surgery in our institution. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: ANOVA, two-way ANOVA, and Student's test. RESULTS: The heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean blood pressure variations were compared between Groups I and II at different time intervals. The variations were found to be significantly higher at the time of skin incision and 2 min after skin incision in Group II as compared to Group I. Pain score was compared between the groups and was found to be significantly lower with Group I (2.5 ± 1.2) as compared to Group II (4.6 ± 1.7), P = (0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Caudal analgesia with GA (Group I) was found to have better hemodynamic control and significantly better postoperative pain relief in the first 24 h after awakening. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6350425/ /pubmed/30648677 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_215_17 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Samantaray, Dharma Jivan
Trehan, Meena
Chowdhry, Vivek
Reedy, Satish
Comparison of Hemodynamic Response and Postoperative Pain Score between General Anaesthesia with Intravenous Analgesia versus General Anesthesia with Caudal Analgesia in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Open-Heart Surgery
title Comparison of Hemodynamic Response and Postoperative Pain Score between General Anaesthesia with Intravenous Analgesia versus General Anesthesia with Caudal Analgesia in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Open-Heart Surgery
title_full Comparison of Hemodynamic Response and Postoperative Pain Score between General Anaesthesia with Intravenous Analgesia versus General Anesthesia with Caudal Analgesia in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Open-Heart Surgery
title_fullStr Comparison of Hemodynamic Response and Postoperative Pain Score between General Anaesthesia with Intravenous Analgesia versus General Anesthesia with Caudal Analgesia in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Open-Heart Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Hemodynamic Response and Postoperative Pain Score between General Anaesthesia with Intravenous Analgesia versus General Anesthesia with Caudal Analgesia in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Open-Heart Surgery
title_short Comparison of Hemodynamic Response and Postoperative Pain Score between General Anaesthesia with Intravenous Analgesia versus General Anesthesia with Caudal Analgesia in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Open-Heart Surgery
title_sort comparison of hemodynamic response and postoperative pain score between general anaesthesia with intravenous analgesia versus general anesthesia with caudal analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing open-heart surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6350425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30648677
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_215_17
work_keys_str_mv AT samantaraydharmajivan comparisonofhemodynamicresponseandpostoperativepainscorebetweengeneralanaesthesiawithintravenousanalgesiaversusgeneralanesthesiawithcaudalanalgesiainpediatricpatientsundergoingopenheartsurgery
AT trehanmeena comparisonofhemodynamicresponseandpostoperativepainscorebetweengeneralanaesthesiawithintravenousanalgesiaversusgeneralanesthesiawithcaudalanalgesiainpediatricpatientsundergoingopenheartsurgery
AT chowdhryvivek comparisonofhemodynamicresponseandpostoperativepainscorebetweengeneralanaesthesiawithintravenousanalgesiaversusgeneralanesthesiawithcaudalanalgesiainpediatricpatientsundergoingopenheartsurgery
AT reedysatish comparisonofhemodynamicresponseandpostoperativepainscorebetweengeneralanaesthesiawithintravenousanalgesiaversusgeneralanesthesiawithcaudalanalgesiainpediatricpatientsundergoingopenheartsurgery