Cargando…
The Association of Oxidative Stress Status with Open-Angle Glaucoma and Exfoliation Glaucoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE: To systematically evaluate the associations between oxidative stress status and different types of glaucoma. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Web of Science for randomized controlled trials written in the English language between Janu...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6350588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30766729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1803619 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: To systematically evaluate the associations between oxidative stress status and different types of glaucoma. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Web of Science for randomized controlled trials written in the English language between January 1, 1990, and November 30, 2016. A random effects model was used to estimate oxidative stress status along with weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A funnel plot analysis and Egger's test were performed to assess potential publication bias. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Oxidative stress status was abnormal and different in patients with OAG (open-angle glaucoma) and EXG (exfoliation glaucoma). RESULTS: Blood TAS (total antioxidant status) was lower in the OAG group than in the control group, with a mean difference of 0.580 mmol/L (p < 0.0001, 95% CI = −0.668 to −0.492). The aqueous humor SOD (superoxide dismutase), GPX (glutathione peroxidase), and CAT (catalase) levels were higher in the OAG group than in the control group, with mean differences of 17.989 U/mL (p < 0.0001, 95% CI = 14.579–21.298), 12.441 U/mL (p < 0.0001, 95% CI = 10.423–14.459), and 1.229 fmol/mL (p=0.042, 95% CI = 0.043–2.414), respectively. Blood TAS was lower in the EXG group than in the control group, with a mean difference of 0.262 mmol/L (p < 0.0001, 95% CI = −0.393 to −0.132). However, there were no differences in blood TOS and aqueous humor TOS between the EXG group and the control group. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis indicates that OAG patients had a lower TAS in the blood and higher levels of SOD, GPX, and CAT in the aqueous humor, while EXG patients only had a decreased TAS in the blood. |
---|