Cargando…

Tumor Treating Fields for Glioblastoma Treatment: Patient Satisfaction and Compliance With the Second-Generation Optune(®) System

BACKGROUND: Tumor treating fields (TTFields) are a non-invasive antimitotic therapy that delivers alternating electric fields via the Optune(®) system. The Phase III EF-14 trial in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) showed significantly improved progression-free, overall and long-term sur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kinzel, Adrian, Ambrogi, Michael, Varshaver, Michael, Kirson, Eilon D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6351720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30728735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1179554918825449
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Tumor treating fields (TTFields) are a non-invasive antimitotic therapy that delivers alternating electric fields via the Optune(®) system. The Phase III EF-14 trial in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) showed significantly improved progression-free, overall and long-term survival when Optune was used together with maintenance temozolomide (TMZ) compared with TMZ alone. Compliance (average monthly use) was associated with better clinical outcome. The first-generation Optune system weighed approximately 6 pounds (~2.7 kg). The second-generation redesigned Optune system weighs 2.7 pounds (~1.2 kg). We tested and compared GBM patient experience with the second-generation system versus the first-generation system. METHODS: Ten newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM patients in Germany (median age: 52.9 years [31-79]) were prospectively monitored over the first month of transitioning from the first-generation to the second-generation Optune system. Questionnaires using a numerical analog scale assessed feedback at baseline (first generation) and after 1 month of second-generation use. RESULTS: After transitioning to the second-generation system, compliance improved by more than 10% in four patients, was maintained in five patients and decreased by more than 10% in one patient. Following transition, eight out of nine patients reported a reduction in the triggering of malfunction alarms. Self-reported patient feedback showed improved handling and portability (weight, mobility) of the second- versus the first-generation Optune system. CONCLUSIONS: This patient user survey suggests that patient satisfaction with the second-generation Optune system is improved versus the first-generation system. Improved features of the new system help patients achieve and maintain a higher rate of treatment compliance.