Cargando…

Practical Model Selection for Prospective Virtual Screening

[Image: see text] Virtual (computational) high-throughput screening provides a strategy for prioritizing compounds for experimental screens, but the choice of virtual screening algorithm depends on the data set and evaluation strategy. We consider a wide range of ligand-based machine learning and do...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Shengchao, Alnammi, Moayad, Ericksen, Spencer S., Voter, Andrew F., Ananiev, Gene E., Keck, James L., Hoffmann, F. Michael, Wildman, Scott A., Gitter, Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6351977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30500183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00363
Descripción
Sumario:[Image: see text] Virtual (computational) high-throughput screening provides a strategy for prioritizing compounds for experimental screens, but the choice of virtual screening algorithm depends on the data set and evaluation strategy. We consider a wide range of ligand-based machine learning and docking-based approaches for virtual screening on two protein–protein interactions, PriA-SSB and RMI-FANCM, and present a strategy for choosing which algorithm is best for prospective compound prioritization. Our workflow identifies a random forest as the best algorithm for these targets over more sophisticated neural network-based models. The top 250 predictions from our selected random forest recover 37 of the 54 active compounds from a library of 22,434 new molecules assayed on PriA-SSB. We show that virtual screening methods that perform well on public data sets and synthetic benchmarks, like multi-task neural networks, may not always translate to prospective screening performance on a specific assay of interest.