Cargando…

Sex Differences in the Relation between Waist Circumference within the Normal Range and Development of Reflux Esophagitis

We examined the association of abdominal obesity and waist circumference within normal range with the incidence of reflux esophagitis, separately in men and women. This cohort study involved 142,679 Korean adults without reflux esophagitis, who underwent upper endoscopy at baseline and during follow...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Hyo-Joon, Chang, Yoosoo, Park, Soo-Kyung, Jung, Yoon Suk, Park, Jung Ho, Park, Dong Il, Ryu, Seungho, Sohn, Chong Il
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6352112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30634537
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8010067
_version_ 1783390753081262080
author Yang, Hyo-Joon
Chang, Yoosoo
Park, Soo-Kyung
Jung, Yoon Suk
Park, Jung Ho
Park, Dong Il
Ryu, Seungho
Sohn, Chong Il
author_facet Yang, Hyo-Joon
Chang, Yoosoo
Park, Soo-Kyung
Jung, Yoon Suk
Park, Jung Ho
Park, Dong Il
Ryu, Seungho
Sohn, Chong Il
author_sort Yang, Hyo-Joon
collection PubMed
description We examined the association of abdominal obesity and waist circumference within normal range with the incidence of reflux esophagitis, separately in men and women. This cohort study involved 142,679 Korean adults without reflux esophagitis, who underwent upper endoscopy at baseline and during follow-up. Waist circumference was categorized into the following quartiles: <80, 80.1–85, 85.1–90, and ≥90.1 cm in men; and <69.3, 69.3–74, 74.1–79.5, and ≥79.6 cm in women. During the 551,877.8 person-years of follow-up, 29,509 participants developed reflux esophagitis. The association between waist circumference quartiles and risk of reflux esophagitis significantly differed with sex (p for interaction < 0.001). In men, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence intervals (CIs)) comparing waist circumference quartiles 2, 3, and 4 to the lowest quartile were 1.03 (0.99–1.07), 1.08 (1.04–1.12), and 1.15 (1.10–1.19), respectively. In women, HRs (95% CIs) comparing quartiles 1, 2, and 4 to the 3rd quartile were 1.10 (1.04–1.17), 1.03 (0.98–1.10), and 1.07 (1.01–1.13), respectively. In this large cohort with endoscopic follow-up, the risk of reflux esophagitis increased with increasing waist circumference even within the normal range in men, whereas the risk increased with low normal waist circumference or with abdominal obesity in women, indicating a U-shaped association.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6352112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63521122019-02-01 Sex Differences in the Relation between Waist Circumference within the Normal Range and Development of Reflux Esophagitis Yang, Hyo-Joon Chang, Yoosoo Park, Soo-Kyung Jung, Yoon Suk Park, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Ryu, Seungho Sohn, Chong Il J Clin Med Article We examined the association of abdominal obesity and waist circumference within normal range with the incidence of reflux esophagitis, separately in men and women. This cohort study involved 142,679 Korean adults without reflux esophagitis, who underwent upper endoscopy at baseline and during follow-up. Waist circumference was categorized into the following quartiles: <80, 80.1–85, 85.1–90, and ≥90.1 cm in men; and <69.3, 69.3–74, 74.1–79.5, and ≥79.6 cm in women. During the 551,877.8 person-years of follow-up, 29,509 participants developed reflux esophagitis. The association between waist circumference quartiles and risk of reflux esophagitis significantly differed with sex (p for interaction < 0.001). In men, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence intervals (CIs)) comparing waist circumference quartiles 2, 3, and 4 to the lowest quartile were 1.03 (0.99–1.07), 1.08 (1.04–1.12), and 1.15 (1.10–1.19), respectively. In women, HRs (95% CIs) comparing quartiles 1, 2, and 4 to the 3rd quartile were 1.10 (1.04–1.17), 1.03 (0.98–1.10), and 1.07 (1.01–1.13), respectively. In this large cohort with endoscopic follow-up, the risk of reflux esophagitis increased with increasing waist circumference even within the normal range in men, whereas the risk increased with low normal waist circumference or with abdominal obesity in women, indicating a U-shaped association. MDPI 2019-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6352112/ /pubmed/30634537 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8010067 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yang, Hyo-Joon
Chang, Yoosoo
Park, Soo-Kyung
Jung, Yoon Suk
Park, Jung Ho
Park, Dong Il
Ryu, Seungho
Sohn, Chong Il
Sex Differences in the Relation between Waist Circumference within the Normal Range and Development of Reflux Esophagitis
title Sex Differences in the Relation between Waist Circumference within the Normal Range and Development of Reflux Esophagitis
title_full Sex Differences in the Relation between Waist Circumference within the Normal Range and Development of Reflux Esophagitis
title_fullStr Sex Differences in the Relation between Waist Circumference within the Normal Range and Development of Reflux Esophagitis
title_full_unstemmed Sex Differences in the Relation between Waist Circumference within the Normal Range and Development of Reflux Esophagitis
title_short Sex Differences in the Relation between Waist Circumference within the Normal Range and Development of Reflux Esophagitis
title_sort sex differences in the relation between waist circumference within the normal range and development of reflux esophagitis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6352112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30634537
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8010067
work_keys_str_mv AT yanghyojoon sexdifferencesintherelationbetweenwaistcircumferencewithinthenormalrangeanddevelopmentofrefluxesophagitis
AT changyoosoo sexdifferencesintherelationbetweenwaistcircumferencewithinthenormalrangeanddevelopmentofrefluxesophagitis
AT parksookyung sexdifferencesintherelationbetweenwaistcircumferencewithinthenormalrangeanddevelopmentofrefluxesophagitis
AT jungyoonsuk sexdifferencesintherelationbetweenwaistcircumferencewithinthenormalrangeanddevelopmentofrefluxesophagitis
AT parkjungho sexdifferencesintherelationbetweenwaistcircumferencewithinthenormalrangeanddevelopmentofrefluxesophagitis
AT parkdongil sexdifferencesintherelationbetweenwaistcircumferencewithinthenormalrangeanddevelopmentofrefluxesophagitis
AT ryuseungho sexdifferencesintherelationbetweenwaistcircumferencewithinthenormalrangeanddevelopmentofrefluxesophagitis
AT sohnchongil sexdifferencesintherelationbetweenwaistcircumferencewithinthenormalrangeanddevelopmentofrefluxesophagitis