Cargando…

Process evaluation of a peer-led antenatal breastfeeding class for fathers: perceptions of facilitators and participants

BACKGROUND: The Parent Infant Feeding Initiative (PIFI) was a factorial, randomised controlled trial that aimed to prolong exclusive breastfeeding by targeting expecting fathers. One of the intervention strategies evaluated was a father-focused breastfeeding class facilitated by a male peer facilita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuliukas, Lesley, Hauck, Yvonne L., Jorgensen, Anita, Kneebone, Kelly, Burns, Sharyn K., Maycock, Bruce R., Scott, Jane A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6352333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30696411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2198-6
_version_ 1783390811128332288
author Kuliukas, Lesley
Hauck, Yvonne L.
Jorgensen, Anita
Kneebone, Kelly
Burns, Sharyn K.
Maycock, Bruce R.
Scott, Jane A.
author_facet Kuliukas, Lesley
Hauck, Yvonne L.
Jorgensen, Anita
Kneebone, Kelly
Burns, Sharyn K.
Maycock, Bruce R.
Scott, Jane A.
author_sort Kuliukas, Lesley
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Parent Infant Feeding Initiative (PIFI) was a factorial, randomised controlled trial that aimed to prolong exclusive breastfeeding by targeting expecting fathers. One of the intervention strategies evaluated was a father-focused breastfeeding class facilitated by a male peer facilitator. The aim of this mixed-methods descriptive study was to 1) evaluate the feedback provided from participants of the class and 2) explore the motivations and experiences of volunteer male peer facilitators trained to deliver the class. METHODS: Father-focused breastfeeding antenatal (FFAB) classes were conducted in six Western Australian hospitals between August 2015 and December 2016. Following each peer facilitated FFAB class, expecting father participants completed an evaluation form to assess their satisfaction with the format, facilitation and content, in addition to whether their expectations and confidence to manage breastfeeding problems had changed. Feedback to open-ended questions was analysed using content analysis to identify learnings and suggestions for improvements. At the completion of PIFI, individual telephone interviews were undertaken with 14 peer facilitators to gain insight into their motivations for volunteering and experiences of conducting the classes. Transcripts from interviews were analysed using Braun and Clarke’s six phases for thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participant evaluation forms were completed by 678 of the 697 father participants (98%). Overall satisfaction with class format, facilitation and content was high with 90% or more of fathers either strongly agreeing or agreeing with each positively-phrased evaluation item. Class participants enjoyed interacting with other fathers, appreciated validation of their role, were not always aware of the importance of breastfeeding or potential difficulties, valued the anticipatory guidance around what to expect in the early weeks of parenting and appreciated learning practical breastfeeding support strategies. Peer facilitators indicated they felt well prepared and supported to conduct FFAB classes. Analysis of interview transcripts revealed common experiences of the peer facilitators incorporating four themes: ‘Highlights of being a facilitator’, ‘Challenges’, ‘Mourning the project completion’ and ‘Satisfaction with training and support’. CONCLUSION: Father-focused breastfeeding classes supported by volunteer male peer facilitators are a feasible and acceptable way of engaging fathers as breastfeeding supporters. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12614000605695. Registered 6 June 2014.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6352333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63523332019-02-04 Process evaluation of a peer-led antenatal breastfeeding class for fathers: perceptions of facilitators and participants Kuliukas, Lesley Hauck, Yvonne L. Jorgensen, Anita Kneebone, Kelly Burns, Sharyn K. Maycock, Bruce R. Scott, Jane A. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The Parent Infant Feeding Initiative (PIFI) was a factorial, randomised controlled trial that aimed to prolong exclusive breastfeeding by targeting expecting fathers. One of the intervention strategies evaluated was a father-focused breastfeeding class facilitated by a male peer facilitator. The aim of this mixed-methods descriptive study was to 1) evaluate the feedback provided from participants of the class and 2) explore the motivations and experiences of volunteer male peer facilitators trained to deliver the class. METHODS: Father-focused breastfeeding antenatal (FFAB) classes were conducted in six Western Australian hospitals between August 2015 and December 2016. Following each peer facilitated FFAB class, expecting father participants completed an evaluation form to assess their satisfaction with the format, facilitation and content, in addition to whether their expectations and confidence to manage breastfeeding problems had changed. Feedback to open-ended questions was analysed using content analysis to identify learnings and suggestions for improvements. At the completion of PIFI, individual telephone interviews were undertaken with 14 peer facilitators to gain insight into their motivations for volunteering and experiences of conducting the classes. Transcripts from interviews were analysed using Braun and Clarke’s six phases for thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participant evaluation forms were completed by 678 of the 697 father participants (98%). Overall satisfaction with class format, facilitation and content was high with 90% or more of fathers either strongly agreeing or agreeing with each positively-phrased evaluation item. Class participants enjoyed interacting with other fathers, appreciated validation of their role, were not always aware of the importance of breastfeeding or potential difficulties, valued the anticipatory guidance around what to expect in the early weeks of parenting and appreciated learning practical breastfeeding support strategies. Peer facilitators indicated they felt well prepared and supported to conduct FFAB classes. Analysis of interview transcripts revealed common experiences of the peer facilitators incorporating four themes: ‘Highlights of being a facilitator’, ‘Challenges’, ‘Mourning the project completion’ and ‘Satisfaction with training and support’. CONCLUSION: Father-focused breastfeeding classes supported by volunteer male peer facilitators are a feasible and acceptable way of engaging fathers as breastfeeding supporters. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12614000605695. Registered 6 June 2014. BioMed Central 2019-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6352333/ /pubmed/30696411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2198-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kuliukas, Lesley
Hauck, Yvonne L.
Jorgensen, Anita
Kneebone, Kelly
Burns, Sharyn K.
Maycock, Bruce R.
Scott, Jane A.
Process evaluation of a peer-led antenatal breastfeeding class for fathers: perceptions of facilitators and participants
title Process evaluation of a peer-led antenatal breastfeeding class for fathers: perceptions of facilitators and participants
title_full Process evaluation of a peer-led antenatal breastfeeding class for fathers: perceptions of facilitators and participants
title_fullStr Process evaluation of a peer-led antenatal breastfeeding class for fathers: perceptions of facilitators and participants
title_full_unstemmed Process evaluation of a peer-led antenatal breastfeeding class for fathers: perceptions of facilitators and participants
title_short Process evaluation of a peer-led antenatal breastfeeding class for fathers: perceptions of facilitators and participants
title_sort process evaluation of a peer-led antenatal breastfeeding class for fathers: perceptions of facilitators and participants
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6352333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30696411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2198-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kuliukaslesley processevaluationofapeerledantenatalbreastfeedingclassforfathersperceptionsoffacilitatorsandparticipants
AT hauckyvonnel processevaluationofapeerledantenatalbreastfeedingclassforfathersperceptionsoffacilitatorsandparticipants
AT jorgensenanita processevaluationofapeerledantenatalbreastfeedingclassforfathersperceptionsoffacilitatorsandparticipants
AT kneebonekelly processevaluationofapeerledantenatalbreastfeedingclassforfathersperceptionsoffacilitatorsandparticipants
AT burnssharynk processevaluationofapeerledantenatalbreastfeedingclassforfathersperceptionsoffacilitatorsandparticipants
AT maycockbrucer processevaluationofapeerledantenatalbreastfeedingclassforfathersperceptionsoffacilitatorsandparticipants
AT scottjanea processevaluationofapeerledantenatalbreastfeedingclassforfathersperceptionsoffacilitatorsandparticipants