Cargando…
Improved adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: the ADENOMA randomised controlled trial
OBJECTIVE: Low adenoma detection rates (ADR) are linked to increased postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer rates and reduced cancer survival. Devices to enhance mucosal visualisation such as Endocuff Vision (EV) may improve ADR. This multicentre randomised controlled trial compared ADR between EV-assist...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6352411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29363535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314889 |
_version_ | 1783390834126749696 |
---|---|
author | Ngu, Wee Sing Bevan, Roisin Tsiamoulos, Zacharias P Bassett, Paul Hoare, Zoë Rutter, Matthew D Clifford, Gayle Totton, Nicola Lee, Thomas J Ramadas, Arvind Silcock, John G Painter, John Neilson, Laura J Saunders, Brian P Rees, Colin J |
author_facet | Ngu, Wee Sing Bevan, Roisin Tsiamoulos, Zacharias P Bassett, Paul Hoare, Zoë Rutter, Matthew D Clifford, Gayle Totton, Nicola Lee, Thomas J Ramadas, Arvind Silcock, John G Painter, John Neilson, Laura J Saunders, Brian P Rees, Colin J |
author_sort | Ngu, Wee Sing |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Low adenoma detection rates (ADR) are linked to increased postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer rates and reduced cancer survival. Devices to enhance mucosal visualisation such as Endocuff Vision (EV) may improve ADR. This multicentre randomised controlled trial compared ADR between EV-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) and standard colonoscopy (SC). DESIGN: Patients referred because of symptoms, surveillance or following a positive faecal occult blood test (FOBt) as part of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme were recruited from seven hospitals. ADR, mean adenomas per procedure, size and location of adenomas, sessile serrated polyps, EV removal rate, caecal intubation rate, procedural time, patient experience, effect of EV on workload and adverse events were measured. RESULTS: 1772 patients (57% male, mean age 62 years) were recruited over 16 months with 45% recruited through screening. EAC increased ADR globally from 36.2% to 40.9% (P=0.02). The increase was driven by a 10.8% increase in FOBt-positive screening patients (50.9% SC vs 61.7% EAC, P<0.001). EV patients had higher detection of mean adenomas per procedure, sessile serrated polyps, left-sided, diminutive, small adenomas and cancers (cancer 4.1% vs 2.3%, P=0.02). EV removal rate was 4.1%. Median intubation was a minute quicker with EAC (P=0.001), with no difference in caecal intubation rate or withdrawal time. EAC was well tolerated but caused a minor increase in discomfort on anal intubation in patients undergoing colonoscopy with no or minimal sedation. There were no significant EV adverse events. CONCLUSION: EV significantly improved ADR in bowel cancer screening patients and should be used to improve colonoscopic detection. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02552017, Results; ISRCTN11821044, Results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6352411 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63524112019-02-21 Improved adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: the ADENOMA randomised controlled trial Ngu, Wee Sing Bevan, Roisin Tsiamoulos, Zacharias P Bassett, Paul Hoare, Zoë Rutter, Matthew D Clifford, Gayle Totton, Nicola Lee, Thomas J Ramadas, Arvind Silcock, John G Painter, John Neilson, Laura J Saunders, Brian P Rees, Colin J Gut Endoscopy OBJECTIVE: Low adenoma detection rates (ADR) are linked to increased postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer rates and reduced cancer survival. Devices to enhance mucosal visualisation such as Endocuff Vision (EV) may improve ADR. This multicentre randomised controlled trial compared ADR between EV-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) and standard colonoscopy (SC). DESIGN: Patients referred because of symptoms, surveillance or following a positive faecal occult blood test (FOBt) as part of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme were recruited from seven hospitals. ADR, mean adenomas per procedure, size and location of adenomas, sessile serrated polyps, EV removal rate, caecal intubation rate, procedural time, patient experience, effect of EV on workload and adverse events were measured. RESULTS: 1772 patients (57% male, mean age 62 years) were recruited over 16 months with 45% recruited through screening. EAC increased ADR globally from 36.2% to 40.9% (P=0.02). The increase was driven by a 10.8% increase in FOBt-positive screening patients (50.9% SC vs 61.7% EAC, P<0.001). EV patients had higher detection of mean adenomas per procedure, sessile serrated polyps, left-sided, diminutive, small adenomas and cancers (cancer 4.1% vs 2.3%, P=0.02). EV removal rate was 4.1%. Median intubation was a minute quicker with EAC (P=0.001), with no difference in caecal intubation rate or withdrawal time. EAC was well tolerated but caused a minor increase in discomfort on anal intubation in patients undergoing colonoscopy with no or minimal sedation. There were no significant EV adverse events. CONCLUSION: EV significantly improved ADR in bowel cancer screening patients and should be used to improve colonoscopic detection. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02552017, Results; ISRCTN11821044, Results. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-02 2018-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6352411/ /pubmed/29363535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314889 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Endoscopy Ngu, Wee Sing Bevan, Roisin Tsiamoulos, Zacharias P Bassett, Paul Hoare, Zoë Rutter, Matthew D Clifford, Gayle Totton, Nicola Lee, Thomas J Ramadas, Arvind Silcock, John G Painter, John Neilson, Laura J Saunders, Brian P Rees, Colin J Improved adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: the ADENOMA randomised controlled trial |
title | Improved adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: the ADENOMA randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Improved adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: the ADENOMA randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Improved adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: the ADENOMA randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Improved adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: the ADENOMA randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Improved adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: the ADENOMA randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | improved adenoma detection with endocuff vision: the adenoma randomised controlled trial |
topic | Endoscopy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6352411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29363535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314889 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nguweesing improvedadenomadetectionwithendocuffvisiontheadenomarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bevanroisin improvedadenomadetectionwithendocuffvisiontheadenomarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tsiamouloszachariasp improvedadenomadetectionwithendocuffvisiontheadenomarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bassettpaul improvedadenomadetectionwithendocuffvisiontheadenomarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hoarezoe improvedadenomadetectionwithendocuffvisiontheadenomarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ruttermatthewd improvedadenomadetectionwithendocuffvisiontheadenomarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cliffordgayle improvedadenomadetectionwithendocuffvisiontheadenomarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tottonnicola improvedadenomadetectionwithendocuffvisiontheadenomarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT leethomasj improvedadenomadetectionwithendocuffvisiontheadenomarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ramadasarvind improvedadenomadetectionwithendocuffvisiontheadenomarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT silcockjohng improvedadenomadetectionwithendocuffvisiontheadenomarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT painterjohn improvedadenomadetectionwithendocuffvisiontheadenomarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT neilsonlauraj improvedadenomadetectionwithendocuffvisiontheadenomarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT saundersbrianp improvedadenomadetectionwithendocuffvisiontheadenomarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT reescolinj improvedadenomadetectionwithendocuffvisiontheadenomarandomisedcontrolledtrial |