Cargando…
Egg freezing for fertility preservation and family planning: a nationwide survey of US Obstetrics and Gynecology residents
BACKGROUND: Little is known about resident attitudes toward elective egg freezing (EF) or how educational exposure to EF affects residents’ views and ability to counsel patients. This study aimed to evaluate US OB/GYN residents’ views on elective EF, decisions regarding family planning, and whether...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6352445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30696433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-019-0459-x |
_version_ | 1783390842546814976 |
---|---|
author | Esfandiari, Navid Litzky, Julia Sayler, Joshua Zagadailov, Pavel George, Karen DeMars, Leslie |
author_facet | Esfandiari, Navid Litzky, Julia Sayler, Joshua Zagadailov, Pavel George, Karen DeMars, Leslie |
author_sort | Esfandiari, Navid |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Little is known about resident attitudes toward elective egg freezing (EF) or how educational exposure to EF affects residents’ views and ability to counsel patients. This study aimed to evaluate US OB/GYN residents’ views on elective EF, decisions regarding family planning, and whether education on EF affects these views and self-reported comfort discussing EF with patients. METHODS: A 32 question survey was emailed to program directors at all US residency programs for distribution to residents. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate the relationship between educational factors and views on EF and comfort counselling patients. RESULTS: Of those surveyed, 106 residents and 7 fellows completed the survey (103 female). Almost three quarters of female respondents reported postponing pregnancy due to residency (71.8%). Non-exclusive reasons for this choice included career plans (54.4%) and concern for childcare (51.5%) and for fellow residents and their program (50.5%). Of the male and female residents who reported educational exposure to EF (57.5%), almost all of them (95.4%) received this in an REI rotation. Only half of female residents reported being comfortable counseling a patient on EF (49.5%). For female residents, education on EF (p = 0.03) and more advanced level of residency (p = 0.02) were significantly associated with comfort counseling a patient on EF. CONCLUSIONS: Female OB/GYN residents are choosing to delay pregnancy during residency for career and social support reasons. Few residents feel comfortable counseling patients on EF, but appropriate curricular content on EF during residency could improve residents’ comfort in assisting patients with reproductive planning. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12958-019-0459-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6352445 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63524452019-02-06 Egg freezing for fertility preservation and family planning: a nationwide survey of US Obstetrics and Gynecology residents Esfandiari, Navid Litzky, Julia Sayler, Joshua Zagadailov, Pavel George, Karen DeMars, Leslie Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Little is known about resident attitudes toward elective egg freezing (EF) or how educational exposure to EF affects residents’ views and ability to counsel patients. This study aimed to evaluate US OB/GYN residents’ views on elective EF, decisions regarding family planning, and whether education on EF affects these views and self-reported comfort discussing EF with patients. METHODS: A 32 question survey was emailed to program directors at all US residency programs for distribution to residents. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate the relationship between educational factors and views on EF and comfort counselling patients. RESULTS: Of those surveyed, 106 residents and 7 fellows completed the survey (103 female). Almost three quarters of female respondents reported postponing pregnancy due to residency (71.8%). Non-exclusive reasons for this choice included career plans (54.4%) and concern for childcare (51.5%) and for fellow residents and their program (50.5%). Of the male and female residents who reported educational exposure to EF (57.5%), almost all of them (95.4%) received this in an REI rotation. Only half of female residents reported being comfortable counseling a patient on EF (49.5%). For female residents, education on EF (p = 0.03) and more advanced level of residency (p = 0.02) were significantly associated with comfort counseling a patient on EF. CONCLUSIONS: Female OB/GYN residents are choosing to delay pregnancy during residency for career and social support reasons. Few residents feel comfortable counseling patients on EF, but appropriate curricular content on EF during residency could improve residents’ comfort in assisting patients with reproductive planning. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12958-019-0459-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6352445/ /pubmed/30696433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-019-0459-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Esfandiari, Navid Litzky, Julia Sayler, Joshua Zagadailov, Pavel George, Karen DeMars, Leslie Egg freezing for fertility preservation and family planning: a nationwide survey of US Obstetrics and Gynecology residents |
title | Egg freezing for fertility preservation and family planning: a nationwide survey of US Obstetrics and Gynecology residents |
title_full | Egg freezing for fertility preservation and family planning: a nationwide survey of US Obstetrics and Gynecology residents |
title_fullStr | Egg freezing for fertility preservation and family planning: a nationwide survey of US Obstetrics and Gynecology residents |
title_full_unstemmed | Egg freezing for fertility preservation and family planning: a nationwide survey of US Obstetrics and Gynecology residents |
title_short | Egg freezing for fertility preservation and family planning: a nationwide survey of US Obstetrics and Gynecology residents |
title_sort | egg freezing for fertility preservation and family planning: a nationwide survey of us obstetrics and gynecology residents |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6352445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30696433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-019-0459-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT esfandiarinavid eggfreezingforfertilitypreservationandfamilyplanninganationwidesurveyofusobstetricsandgynecologyresidents AT litzkyjulia eggfreezingforfertilitypreservationandfamilyplanninganationwidesurveyofusobstetricsandgynecologyresidents AT saylerjoshua eggfreezingforfertilitypreservationandfamilyplanninganationwidesurveyofusobstetricsandgynecologyresidents AT zagadailovpavel eggfreezingforfertilitypreservationandfamilyplanninganationwidesurveyofusobstetricsandgynecologyresidents AT georgekaren eggfreezingforfertilitypreservationandfamilyplanninganationwidesurveyofusobstetricsandgynecologyresidents AT demarsleslie eggfreezingforfertilitypreservationandfamilyplanninganationwidesurveyofusobstetricsandgynecologyresidents |