Cargando…

Egg freezing for fertility preservation and family planning: a nationwide survey of US Obstetrics and Gynecology residents

BACKGROUND: Little is known about resident attitudes toward elective egg freezing (EF) or how educational exposure to EF affects residents’ views and ability to counsel patients. This study aimed to evaluate US OB/GYN residents’ views on elective EF, decisions regarding family planning, and whether...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Esfandiari, Navid, Litzky, Julia, Sayler, Joshua, Zagadailov, Pavel, George, Karen, DeMars, Leslie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6352445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30696433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-019-0459-x
_version_ 1783390842546814976
author Esfandiari, Navid
Litzky, Julia
Sayler, Joshua
Zagadailov, Pavel
George, Karen
DeMars, Leslie
author_facet Esfandiari, Navid
Litzky, Julia
Sayler, Joshua
Zagadailov, Pavel
George, Karen
DeMars, Leslie
author_sort Esfandiari, Navid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Little is known about resident attitudes toward elective egg freezing (EF) or how educational exposure to EF affects residents’ views and ability to counsel patients. This study aimed to evaluate US OB/GYN residents’ views on elective EF, decisions regarding family planning, and whether education on EF affects these views and self-reported comfort discussing EF with patients. METHODS: A 32 question survey was emailed to program directors at all US residency programs for distribution to residents. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate the relationship between educational factors and views on EF and comfort counselling patients. RESULTS: Of those surveyed, 106 residents and 7 fellows completed the survey (103 female). Almost three quarters of female respondents reported postponing pregnancy due to residency (71.8%). Non-exclusive reasons for this choice included career plans (54.4%) and concern for childcare (51.5%) and for fellow residents and their program (50.5%). Of the male and female residents who reported educational exposure to EF (57.5%), almost all of them (95.4%) received this in an REI rotation. Only half of female residents reported being comfortable counseling a patient on EF (49.5%). For female residents, education on EF (p = 0.03) and more advanced level of residency (p = 0.02) were significantly associated with comfort counseling a patient on EF. CONCLUSIONS: Female OB/GYN residents are choosing to delay pregnancy during residency for career and social support reasons. Few residents feel comfortable counseling patients on EF, but appropriate curricular content on EF during residency could improve residents’ comfort in assisting patients with reproductive planning. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12958-019-0459-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6352445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63524452019-02-06 Egg freezing for fertility preservation and family planning: a nationwide survey of US Obstetrics and Gynecology residents Esfandiari, Navid Litzky, Julia Sayler, Joshua Zagadailov, Pavel George, Karen DeMars, Leslie Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Little is known about resident attitudes toward elective egg freezing (EF) or how educational exposure to EF affects residents’ views and ability to counsel patients. This study aimed to evaluate US OB/GYN residents’ views on elective EF, decisions regarding family planning, and whether education on EF affects these views and self-reported comfort discussing EF with patients. METHODS: A 32 question survey was emailed to program directors at all US residency programs for distribution to residents. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate the relationship between educational factors and views on EF and comfort counselling patients. RESULTS: Of those surveyed, 106 residents and 7 fellows completed the survey (103 female). Almost three quarters of female respondents reported postponing pregnancy due to residency (71.8%). Non-exclusive reasons for this choice included career plans (54.4%) and concern for childcare (51.5%) and for fellow residents and their program (50.5%). Of the male and female residents who reported educational exposure to EF (57.5%), almost all of them (95.4%) received this in an REI rotation. Only half of female residents reported being comfortable counseling a patient on EF (49.5%). For female residents, education on EF (p = 0.03) and more advanced level of residency (p = 0.02) were significantly associated with comfort counseling a patient on EF. CONCLUSIONS: Female OB/GYN residents are choosing to delay pregnancy during residency for career and social support reasons. Few residents feel comfortable counseling patients on EF, but appropriate curricular content on EF during residency could improve residents’ comfort in assisting patients with reproductive planning. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12958-019-0459-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6352445/ /pubmed/30696433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-019-0459-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Esfandiari, Navid
Litzky, Julia
Sayler, Joshua
Zagadailov, Pavel
George, Karen
DeMars, Leslie
Egg freezing for fertility preservation and family planning: a nationwide survey of US Obstetrics and Gynecology residents
title Egg freezing for fertility preservation and family planning: a nationwide survey of US Obstetrics and Gynecology residents
title_full Egg freezing for fertility preservation and family planning: a nationwide survey of US Obstetrics and Gynecology residents
title_fullStr Egg freezing for fertility preservation and family planning: a nationwide survey of US Obstetrics and Gynecology residents
title_full_unstemmed Egg freezing for fertility preservation and family planning: a nationwide survey of US Obstetrics and Gynecology residents
title_short Egg freezing for fertility preservation and family planning: a nationwide survey of US Obstetrics and Gynecology residents
title_sort egg freezing for fertility preservation and family planning: a nationwide survey of us obstetrics and gynecology residents
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6352445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30696433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-019-0459-x
work_keys_str_mv AT esfandiarinavid eggfreezingforfertilitypreservationandfamilyplanninganationwidesurveyofusobstetricsandgynecologyresidents
AT litzkyjulia eggfreezingforfertilitypreservationandfamilyplanninganationwidesurveyofusobstetricsandgynecologyresidents
AT saylerjoshua eggfreezingforfertilitypreservationandfamilyplanninganationwidesurveyofusobstetricsandgynecologyresidents
AT zagadailovpavel eggfreezingforfertilitypreservationandfamilyplanninganationwidesurveyofusobstetricsandgynecologyresidents
AT georgekaren eggfreezingforfertilitypreservationandfamilyplanninganationwidesurveyofusobstetricsandgynecologyresidents
AT demarsleslie eggfreezingforfertilitypreservationandfamilyplanninganationwidesurveyofusobstetricsandgynecologyresidents