Cargando…
Virtual reality gait training versus non-virtual reality gait training for improving participation in subacute stroke survivors: study protocol of the ViRTAS randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: A stroke often results in gait impairments, activity limitations and restricted participation in daily life. Virtual reality (VR) has shown to be beneficial for improving gait ability after stroke. Previous studies regarding VR focused mainly on improvements in functional outcomes. As pa...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6352452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30696491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3165-7 |
_version_ | 1783390844410134528 |
---|---|
author | de Rooij, Ilona J. M. van de Port, Ingrid G. L. Visser-Meily, Johanna M. A. Meijer, Jan-Willem G. |
author_facet | de Rooij, Ilona J. M. van de Port, Ingrid G. L. Visser-Meily, Johanna M. A. Meijer, Jan-Willem G. |
author_sort | de Rooij, Ilona J. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A stroke often results in gait impairments, activity limitations and restricted participation in daily life. Virtual reality (VR) has shown to be beneficial for improving gait ability after stroke. Previous studies regarding VR focused mainly on improvements in functional outcomes. As participation in daily life is an important goal for rehabilitation after stroke, it is of importance to investigate if VR gait training improves participation. The primary aim of this study is to examine the effect of VR gait training on participation in community-living people after stroke. METHODS/DESIGN: The ViRTAS study comprises a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups. Fifty people between 2 weeks and 6 months after stroke, who experience constraints with walking in daily life, are randomly assigned to the virtual reality gait training (VRT) group or the non-virtual reality gait training (non-VRT) group. Both training interventions consist of 12 30-min sessions in an outpatient rehabilitation clinic during 6 weeks. Assessments are performed at baseline, post intervention and 3 months post intervention. The primary outcome is participation measured with the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation (USER-P). Secondary outcomes are subjective physical functioning, functional mobility, walking ability, walking activity, fatigue, anxiety and depression, falls efficacy and quality of life. DISCUSSION: The results of the study provide insight into the effect of VR gait training on participation after stroke. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands National Trial Register, Identifier NTR6215. Registered on 3 February 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-3165-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6352452 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63524522019-02-06 Virtual reality gait training versus non-virtual reality gait training for improving participation in subacute stroke survivors: study protocol of the ViRTAS randomized controlled trial de Rooij, Ilona J. M. van de Port, Ingrid G. L. Visser-Meily, Johanna M. A. Meijer, Jan-Willem G. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: A stroke often results in gait impairments, activity limitations and restricted participation in daily life. Virtual reality (VR) has shown to be beneficial for improving gait ability after stroke. Previous studies regarding VR focused mainly on improvements in functional outcomes. As participation in daily life is an important goal for rehabilitation after stroke, it is of importance to investigate if VR gait training improves participation. The primary aim of this study is to examine the effect of VR gait training on participation in community-living people after stroke. METHODS/DESIGN: The ViRTAS study comprises a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups. Fifty people between 2 weeks and 6 months after stroke, who experience constraints with walking in daily life, are randomly assigned to the virtual reality gait training (VRT) group or the non-virtual reality gait training (non-VRT) group. Both training interventions consist of 12 30-min sessions in an outpatient rehabilitation clinic during 6 weeks. Assessments are performed at baseline, post intervention and 3 months post intervention. The primary outcome is participation measured with the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation (USER-P). Secondary outcomes are subjective physical functioning, functional mobility, walking ability, walking activity, fatigue, anxiety and depression, falls efficacy and quality of life. DISCUSSION: The results of the study provide insight into the effect of VR gait training on participation after stroke. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands National Trial Register, Identifier NTR6215. Registered on 3 February 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-3165-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6352452/ /pubmed/30696491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3165-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol de Rooij, Ilona J. M. van de Port, Ingrid G. L. Visser-Meily, Johanna M. A. Meijer, Jan-Willem G. Virtual reality gait training versus non-virtual reality gait training for improving participation in subacute stroke survivors: study protocol of the ViRTAS randomized controlled trial |
title | Virtual reality gait training versus non-virtual reality gait training for improving participation in subacute stroke survivors: study protocol of the ViRTAS randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Virtual reality gait training versus non-virtual reality gait training for improving participation in subacute stroke survivors: study protocol of the ViRTAS randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Virtual reality gait training versus non-virtual reality gait training for improving participation in subacute stroke survivors: study protocol of the ViRTAS randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Virtual reality gait training versus non-virtual reality gait training for improving participation in subacute stroke survivors: study protocol of the ViRTAS randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Virtual reality gait training versus non-virtual reality gait training for improving participation in subacute stroke survivors: study protocol of the ViRTAS randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | virtual reality gait training versus non-virtual reality gait training for improving participation in subacute stroke survivors: study protocol of the virtas randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6352452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30696491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3165-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT derooijilonajm virtualrealitygaittrainingversusnonvirtualrealitygaittrainingforimprovingparticipationinsubacutestrokesurvivorsstudyprotocolofthevirtasrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandeportingridgl virtualrealitygaittrainingversusnonvirtualrealitygaittrainingforimprovingparticipationinsubacutestrokesurvivorsstudyprotocolofthevirtasrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vissermeilyjohannama virtualrealitygaittrainingversusnonvirtualrealitygaittrainingforimprovingparticipationinsubacutestrokesurvivorsstudyprotocolofthevirtasrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT meijerjanwillemg virtualrealitygaittrainingversusnonvirtualrealitygaittrainingforimprovingparticipationinsubacutestrokesurvivorsstudyprotocolofthevirtasrandomizedcontrolledtrial |